Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Cancers

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1541805

Comparative Efficacy of Interventional Therapy with or without Targeted Immunotherapy in Child-Pugh B Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: a singlecenter, retrospective study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
  • 2 Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Current large clinical trials mainly focus on Child-Pugh A (CP-A) stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, with limited data on CP-B patients especially those classified as B8-9, whose treatment needs remain inadequately addressed. This study aims to evaluate the safety efficacy of interventional treatments, with or without targeted-immunotherapy and characteristics of CP-B stage HCC patients receiving.Methods: This single-center retrospective investigation incorporated 119 patients were stratified into two cohorts: the interventional therapy cohort (42) and the combined targeted immunotherapy cohort (77). The clinical data, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and therapeutic efficacy of both groups were meticulously recorded and comprehensively analyzed. Survival disparities were statistically compared employing the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis method and the log-rank test.Tumor remission was appraised in accordance with the RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria. Independent influencing factors were discerned through multifactorial COX regression analysis. Subsequently, survival prediction models were constructed to generate column line graphs, and the safety profiles and adverse events associated with diverse treatment modalities were also evaluated.Results: 119 patients with CP-B grade HCC were included, and the median survival (mOS) of patients who received combination therapy was 21.4 months (vs 13.2, P=0.038) superior to that of interventional therapy, and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 12.7 months (vs 10.9 months, P=0.183) was not significantly improved.The OS of patients in group B7 who received combination therapy was 24.6 months (vs 11.9, P=0.006) was superior to that of the intervention, while there was no significant improvement in patients in groups B8-9. The objective remission rate (ORR) was higher in the combination therapy than in the intervention group (RECIST: 32.5% vs 11.9%, P = 0.014; mRECIST: 48.1% vs 23.8%, P = 0.010). Except for Child-Pugh score progression (P = 0.003), there was no significant difference in the occurrence of all-grade and ≥grade 3 adverse events in the combination therapy group compared with the intervention group (P > 0.05).Interventional therapy combined with targeted and immunotherapy can be a safe and effective treatment for patients with Child-Pugh grade B hepatocellular carcinoma in the setting of controlled liver function impairment.

    Keywords: Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Child-Pugh B, Interventional therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors

    Received: 08 Dec 2024; Accepted: 26 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Guo, Zhao, Duan, Han, Jinfeng, Shi, Han, Yang and Yin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Guang Yang, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
    Fei Yin, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more