The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Radiation Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1540482
Utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Assess Adherence to Relugolix when Combined with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Intermediate to High-Risk Prostate Cancer
Provisionally accepted- 1 School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
- 2 School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, United States
- 3 Morsani College of Medicine, USF Health, Tampa, Florida, United States
- 4 Biomedical Graduate Education, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, United States
- 5 Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
- 6 Novartis (United States), East Hanover, New Jersey, United States
- 7 The Julius L. Chambers Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
Injectable GnRH receptor agonists can improve cancer control when combined with radiotherapy (RT). Relugolix is an oral GnRH receptor antagonist that achieves rapid testosterone suppression. Non-adherence to oral medications due to poor social support or side effects may increase risk of cancer recurrence. This prospective study sought to evaluate early testosterone suppression and relugolix adherence when combined with prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Utilization of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess adherence and guide intervention may improve oral medication use. This study utilizes the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ) to assess adherence. Relugolix was initiated ≥2 months before questionnaire administration. Total testosterone levels were obtained at the time of SMAQ administration. Castration was defined as serum testosterone ≤ 50 ng/dL. Poor drug adherence was delineated as failure to reach castration or SMAQ non-adherence (any non-adherence answer, missed > 2 doses in last week or since last visit). To compare demographic and clinical characteristics of nonadherent versus adherent patients, t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test were used. A p-value < 0.05 determined statistical significance. Between August 2021 and December 2023, 78 men were treated at Georgetown with relugolix and prostate SBRT per an institutional protocol. The median age was 72, and 41% of patients were non-white. Patients initiated relugolix at a median of 4 months before the SMAQ (2-19 months). 96% of patients achieved castration (≤ 50 ng/dL) at the time of the SMAQ. 96% of men reported always taking relugolix at the appropriate time. 1% discontinued medication due to bothersome side effects, 17% reported forgetting to take the medication, and 4% reported missing a dose during the weekend. 98% and 93% did not miss a dose more than 2 times in the last week and since the last visit, respectively. Overall patient-reported drug adherence was 75%. No patient demographic or clinical characteristic predicted non-adherence. Relugolix allows for high rates of castration and drug adherence when combined with prostate SBRT. Monitoring drug adherence during treatment allows for prompt detection of nonadherence and timely intervention. Future studies should focus on optimally incorporating this questionnaire into patient management.
Keywords: SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy), relugolix, ADT (androgen deprivation therapy), prostate cancer, Medication Adherence
Received: 05 Dec 2024; Accepted: 09 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gaudian, Koh, Koh, Collins, Eden, Zwart, Danner, Zwart, Fallick, Kumar, Leger, Dawson, Suy and Collins. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Kelly Gaudian, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, 63110, Missouri, United States
Ryan Collins, Morsani College of Medicine, USF Health, Tampa, 33612, Florida, United States
Shaine Eden, Biomedical Graduate Education, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., 20057-1411, District of Columbia, United States
Zoya Zwart, Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, 20007, District of Columbia, United States
Malika Danner, Morsani College of Medicine, USF Health, Tampa, 33612, Florida, United States
Alan Zwart, Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, 20007, District of Columbia, United States
Mark Fallick, Novartis (United States), East Hanover, NJ 07936, New Jersey, United States
Nancy A Dawson, Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, 20007, District of Columbia, United States
Simeng Suy, Morsani College of Medicine, USF Health, Tampa, 33612, Florida, United States
Sean P Collins, Morsani College of Medicine, USF Health, Tampa, 33612, Florida, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.