Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgical Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1539845

Predicting Overall Survival in Glioblastoma Patients Using Machine Learning: An Analysis of Treatment Efficacy and Patient Prognosis

Provisionally accepted
Razvan Onciul Razvan Onciul 1,2Felix Mircea Brehar Felix Mircea Brehar 1,3*Adrian Vasile Dumitru Adrian Vasile Dumitru 1,2*Carla Crivoi Carla Crivoi 4Razvan-Adrian Covache-Busuioc Razvan-Adrian Covache-Busuioc 1,5Matei Serban Matei Serban 1,5Petrinel Mugurel Radoi Petrinel Mugurel Radoi 1,5Corneliu Toader Corneliu Toader 1,5
  • 1 Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
  • 2 Bucharest University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
  • 3 Department of Neurosurgery, Emergency Clinical Hospital Bagdasar Arseni, Bucharest, Romania
  • 4 Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
  • 5 National Institute of Neurology and Neurovascular Diseases Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive primary brain tumor, poses a significant challenge in predicting patient survival due to its heterogeneity and resistance to treatment. Accurate survival prediction is essential for optimizing treatment strategies and improving clinical outcomes. Methods: This study utilized metadata from 135 GBM patients, including demographic, clinical, and molecular variables such as age, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), MGMT promoter methylation, and EGFR amplification. Six machine learning models-XGBoost, Random Forests, Support Vector Machines, Artificial Neural Networks, Extra Trees Regressor, and K-Nearest Neighbors-were employed to classify patients into predefined survival categories. Data preprocessing included label encoding for categorical variables and MinMax scaling for numerical features. Model performance was assessed using ROC-AUC and accuracy metrics, with hyperparameters optimized through grid search. Results: XGBoost demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, achieving a mean ROC-AUC of 0.90 and an accuracy of 0.78. Ensemble models outperformed simpler classifiers, emphasizing the predictive value of metadata. The models identified key prognostic markers, including MGMT promoter methylation and KPS, as significant contributors to survival prediction. Conclusions: The application of machine learning to GBM metadata offers a robust approach to predicting patient survival. The study highlights the potential of ML models to enhance clinical decision-making and contribute to personalized treatment strategies, with a focus on accuracy, reliability, and interpretability.

    Keywords: machine learning, Prognostic biomarkers, Explainable AI, Survival Prediction, Clinical decision support, personalized medicine, Predictive Modeling

    Received: 04 Dec 2024; Accepted: 06 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Onciul, Brehar, Dumitru, Crivoi, Covache-Busuioc, Serban, Radoi and Toader. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Felix Mircea Brehar, Department of Neurosurgery, Emergency Clinical Hospital Bagdasar Arseni, Bucharest, Romania
    Adrian Vasile Dumitru, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more