Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Head and Neck Cancer

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1539070

This article is part of the Research Topic Multidisciplinary Management of Oral Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Rehabilitation View all 5 articles

Impact of Face Masks on Empathy and Communication in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Case-Control Study

Provisionally accepted
Georg Hoene Georg Hoene 1*Nikolaus Von Hahn Nikolaus Von Hahn 1Tim Mathea Tim Mathea 1Boris Schminke Boris Schminke 1Kathi Goldstein Kathi Goldstein 1Martin Leu Martin Leu 2Henning Schliephake Henning Schliephake 1Susanne Wolfer Susanne Wolfer 1
  • 1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany
  • 2 Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Germany, Göttingen, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the widespread use of face masks in medical settings. In the treatment of patients with head and neck tumors or other malignancies, where non-verbal communication and emotional expression are critical, face masks may potentially impair the physicianpatient relationship. This study aimed to assess the impact of face masks on perceived empathy and the quality of physician-patient communication in this patient cohort.Methods: A prospective case-control study as part of the postoperative follow-up consultations was conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, utilizing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure. Patients were divided into two groups: in the case group, clinicians wore face masks throughout the entire consultation, while in the control group, masks were worn only during the clinical examination. The primary outcome was the difference in CARE scores, reflecting the perceived empathy of the clinician.No significant difference in mean CARE scores was observed between the two groups (p=0.454), indicating that wearing a face mask did not significantly affect patients' perception of clinician empathy. However, a significant positive correlation was found between patients' familiarity with the clinician and higher CARE scores (p=0.003). Other variables, such as patient health status and consultation duration, did not significantly influence CARE scores.Wearing face masks does not significantly impair perceived empathy in the context of physician-patient communication. Familiarity with the clinician emerged as a key factor in enhancing the quality of the interaction. These findings underscore the importance of fostering long-term, trustbased physician-patient relationships, particularly during periods of pandemic-related protective measures such as mask mandates.

    Keywords: oral squamous cell carcinoma, COVID 19, face masks, CARE-Questionnaire, Empathy, Physician-Patient Relations, Communication Barriers, oral and maxillofacial surgery

    Received: 03 Dec 2024; Accepted: 19 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Hoene, Von Hahn, Mathea, Schminke, Goldstein, Leu, Schliephake and Wolfer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Georg Hoene, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, 37099, Lower Saxony, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more