ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Gastric and Esophageal Cancers

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1536811

Peripheral blood metabolic composite score based on peripheral blood metabolism can be used as an assessment of recurrence after surgery in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: A novel and promising index

Provisionally accepted
Ning  MengNing Meng1*Zhiqiang  WangZhiqiang Wang1Yaqi  PengYaqi Peng2Xiaoyan  WangXiaoyan Wang1Wenju  YueWenju Yue1Le  WangLe Wang1Jing  LvJing Lv3Wenqian  MaWenqian Ma3
  • 1Shijiazhuang People’s Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
  • 2Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
  • 3Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Postoperative recurrence remains a major challenge in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Identifying reliable biomarkers for predicting recurrence can guide clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the association between four peripheral blood metabolic markers and postoperative recurrence in LAGC patients, and to develop a predictive model based on these markers. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 1,040 patients with LAGC who underwent radical surgical resection between January 2010 and December 2019. Peripheral blood metabolic indicators, including low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein (LHR), cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein (TCHR), triglycerides/high-density lipoprotein (TGHR), and triglycerides × fasting blood glucose (TyG), were used to assess metabolic status. Multivariable regression and survival analysis were performed to assess the prognostic value of these markers. A nomogram combining metabolic markers and clinical factors was developed and validated for predicting postoperative recurrence. Results: High levels of LHR, TCHR, TGHR, and TyG were significantly associated with increased risk of postoperative recurrence in LAGC patients (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified TNM stage, pathological type, systemic immune inflammation index (SII), and metabolic score as independent predictors of recurrence. A predictive model incorporating these factors demonstrated superior performance compared to clinical features alone, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.867 (95% CI: 0.836-0.897) in the training set, 0.887 (95% CI: 0.844-0.929) in internal validation set, 0.859 (95% CI: 0.817-0.899) in the external validation set. Patients with high metabolic scores had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), further supporting the model's prognostic value. Conclusions: Peripheral blood metabolic markers, particularly LHR, TCHR, TGHR, and TyG, are valuable predictors of postoperative recurrence in LAGC patients. The combined predictive model, integrating metabolic markers and clinical features, provides an effective tool for personalized risk stratification and may assist in optimizing postoperative management in LAGC.

Keywords: Locally advanced gastric cancer, Postoperative recurrence, metabolic markers, predictive model, nomogram

Received: 04 Dec 2024; Accepted: 26 Mar 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Meng, Wang, Peng, Wang, Yue, Wang, Lv and Ma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ning Meng, Shijiazhuang People’s Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more