data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
REVIEW article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Genitourinary Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1534739
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Cryotherapy plays a crucial role in managing radio-recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after initial treatment. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of its effectiveness and associated complications.A systematic review was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE databases up to June 2024, focusing on recurrence-free survival (RFS) with salvage cryotherapy across various subgroups. Severe complications were also assessed. Survival curves were reconstructed using WebPlotDigitizer and a newly developed Shiny application. The incidence of complications was summarized with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. Complications were evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo Scale (CDS).Thirty-six studies were included, with 15 papers (3174 patients) contributing to survival curve reconstruction. Among 1593 patients treated with salvage cryotherapy, the median RFS was 56.7 months, with 2-, 3-, and 5-year rates of 67.6%, 59.5%, and 47.3%, respectively. Factors associated with better RFS included a longer time from primary treatment to salvage therapy (TRS) [> 70 months vs. < 70 months, hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI):0.75(0.58-0.97), p=0.031], lower pre-salvage prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels [< 5 ng/mL vs. > 5 ng/mL, HR (95% CI):0.78 (0.65-0.93), p=0.005], salvage whole-gland cryotherapy (SWC) [whole vs. focal, HR (95% CI):0.45 (0.37-0.56), p < 0.001], neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) [Yes vs. No, HR (95% CI):0.79 (0.69-0.89), p < 0.001], and higher adjuvant ADT usage [16.5-34.2% vs. 0-10.5%, HR (95% CI):0.47(0.39-0.56), p < 0.001]. Concerning severe complications, 78 out of 876 patients (8.9%, 95% CI: 7-11) experienced genitourinary (GU) events, 53 out of 633 patients (8.5%, 95% CI: 6-11) suffered from urinary incontinence, 15 out of 493 patients (3.0%, 95% CI: 2-5) had urethral sloughing/stenosis, and 6 out of 522 patients (1.1%, 95% CI: 0-2) developed recto-urethral/vesical fistula. No cases of severe haematuria, urinary tract infection, or urinary retention were reported. Conclusions: Cryotherapy demonstrates a favorable safety profile and significant RFS benefits for salvage treatment of radio-recurrent PCa. Longer TRS, lower pre-salvage PSA, SWC, and peri-salvage ADT usage appear to be promising prognostic factors for RFS. However, confirmation of these findings requires randomized controlled trials (RCTs) due to the low evidence levels and study heterogeneity.
Keywords: prostate cancer, Recurrence, radio-recurrent, Salvage, Cryotherapy
Received: 26 Nov 2024; Accepted: 27 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhu, Liu, Shen, Xu, Zhong and Jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Sheng Jin, Shaoxing Second Hospital, Shaoxing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.