Zhendong Yang1†
Jianyuan Huang
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
- 2Department of Oncology, Rui-Kang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China
- 3Department of Ultrasonography, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
Background: The cervical node with necrosis (CNN) is an important poor prognostic factor for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. The tumor microenvironment of the CNN has severely insufficient blood perfusion, thus leading to hypoxia and reducing the effect of radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. By using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a monitoring method, we conducted this study to assess whether antiangiogenic therapy (AT) with recombinant human endostatin (RHES) may improve blood perfusion of the CNN.
Materials and methods: Fifteen NPC patients with CNN were enrolled and underwent CEUS the day before and day 5 after AT with RHES initiation, respectively. By analyzing the variations of CEUS parameters of CNN, such as peak intensity (PI), time to peak (TTP), and mean transit time (MTT) at different time points, we evaluate the impact of AT with RHES on blood perfusion of CNN.
Results: The PI of day 5 after AT was significantly enhanced compared to the PI of the day before AT [−44.94 ± 4.72 (dB) vs. −50.33 ± 6.85 (dB), p < 0.001]. The TTP of day 5 after AT became dramatically shorter than the TTP of the day before AT [19.48 ± 3.63 (s) vs. 24.19 ± 6.93 (s), p = 0.031]. The MTT of day 5 after AT became obviously shorter than the MTT of the day before AT [28.08 ± 3.03 (s) vs. 33.76 ± 6.20 (s), p = 0.001].
Conclusion: These results revealed that the blood volume and the blood flow velocity in the microvessels of the CNN increased after AT, indicating that AT with RHES may improve blood perfusion in the CNN of NPC, thus providing valuable insights for the clinical application of AT combined with RT and/or chemotherapy in NPC patients with CNN. Moreover, CEUS as a noninvasive and real-time monitoring method may be suitable for clinically evaluating tumor blood perfusion changes.
Introduction
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in East Asia, Southeast Asia, and North Africa (1). For NPC, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with chemotherapy is the primary and most effective treatment, resulting in significant improvements of the therapeutic effect compared with the era of two-dimensional radiotherapy (RT) (2). However, local recurrence and/or distant metastasis after IMRT occurs in a subset of NPC patients. The risk factors include advanced clinical staging and not receiving chemotherapy (3). In addition, the metastatic cervical node with necrosis (CNN) is also a poor prognostic factor that should be nonnegligible. Recently, Luo (4) essentially generalized the complex relationship between NPC cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME), advocating a novel perspective that NPC should be considered as a complex ecological disease—a multidimensional spatiotemporal pathological ecosystem rather than a genetic disease. Through the “Mulberry-fish-ponds” ecological model, Luo explained the dynamic interaction and co-evolution between tumor cells and TME. The pathological ecosystem of NPC, especially the TME of the CNN, has severely insufficient blood perfusion, thus leading to hypoxia, making the tumor more aggressive and antagonizing the effect of RT and chemotherapy, and leading to negative impacts on the prognosis of NPC (5–7). Several clinical studies have shown that the addition of antiangiogenic therapy (AT) to RT and chemotherapy was an effective regimen for advanced NPC (8–10), and the “vascular normalization” plays a crucial role in optimizing the synergistic effect of such combination therapy (11, 12).
In a previous study using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), Yang et al. (13) reported that AT with recombinant human endostatin (RHES) had a vascular normalization effect on NPC patients and improved the blood perfusion of the primary tumors in nasopharynx within 5 days. Nevertheless, the CNN had worse vascular abnormality, whether AT with RHES can improve blood perfusion of the CNN and alleviate hypoxia, thereby enhancing the therapeutic effect of NPC patients with CNN, thus necessitating further research. Consequently, this study aims to utilize CEUS to observe and analyze the variations in CEUS parameters of the CNN before and after AT with RHES and then explore the impact of AT on blood perfusion of the CNN and provide evidence supporting AT treatment in NPC patients with CNN.
Material and methods
Patients
A total of 15 NPC patients diagnosed by histopathology in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from August 2019 to August 2020 were enrolled in this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows (1): diagnosed with histopathology-confirmed NPC (2); without any previous anti-tumor treatment; (3) stage III–IVA NPC according to the 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC staging system; (4) metastasis of CNN diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (5) Karnofsky scores ≥70; and (6) signed informed consent.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age <18 years or >70 years; (2) allergic to SonoVue (Bracco, Milan, Italy); (3) not suitable for MRI; (4) cervical vertebra injury; (5) infection or rupture in neck skin; (6) cardiovascular right to left shunt; (7) severe cardiac arrhythmias; (8) myocardial infarction; (9) severe pulmonary hypertension; (10) hemorrhagic tendency; (11) pregnancy or lactation; and (12) mental disorder.
This study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, revised in 2008. Ethical approval (no. 2018[KY-E-042]) was obtained from the medical ethics committees of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. All patients signed informed consent and all patient details were de-identified.
Selecting the target CNN
Each patient enrolled in this study underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the nasopharynx and neck prior to the treatment, and some specific lymph nodes were selected as the target CNN (tCNN). The MRI features of CNN were as follows (14): The central region of the lymph node showed high signal on the T2-weighted sequence and low signal on the T1 enhancement sequence, with or without marginal reinforcement (Figures 1A, B). If multiple CNNs were present in the same patient, the one with the largest proportion of necrotic area (i.e., on the axial T2 sequence, the long diameter of the necrotic area divided by the long diameter of the TLNs) should be selected (Figures 2A, B).
Figure 1
Figure 1. MRI images of the CNN (as indicated by the red arrow). (A) The central region of the CNN showed high signal on the T2-weighted sequence. (B) The central region of the CNN showed low signal on the T1 enhancement sequence.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Principle of selecting the tCNN. If multiple CNNs were present in the same patient, the one with the largest proportion of necrotic area, as indicated by the red arrow rather than the green arrow, should be selected. (A) MRI images of the tCNN on the axial T2 sequence. (B) MRI images of the tCNN on the axial T1 enhancement sequence.
AT with RHES
All patients received AT with RHES (solubilized in 250 mL of 0.9% normal saline) intravenously with a dosage of 7.5 mg/m2 per day for 5 days prior to RT or chemotherapy.
CEUS and parametric analysis
All patients underwent CEUS the day before and day 5 after AT with RHES initiation, respectively. To ensure the accuracy and consistency of CEUS, the following principles were adhered to (1): all examinations were performed by a single sonographer with over 5 years of experience in CEUS; (2) all examinations were conducted using a single Aplio 500 Ultrasound System (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan); and (3) SonoVue (Bracco, Milan, Italy) was used as the ultrasound contrast agent.
The procedural steps for CEUS were as follows: (1) body position: the patient was positioned supine on the examination bed with hands resting naturally at their sides, and the head turned towards the opposite side of the TLN, ensuring that the opposite auricle was in close proximity to the bed surface. (2) Localization of tCNN: utilizing MRI images as a reference, two-dimensional ultrasound was performed to accurately locate the tCNN (Figures 3A, B). (3) Recording of parameters: detailed documentation of body position, probe angle, initial location, and depth of tCNN during first CEUS procedure, along with other relevant technical parameters of the ultrasound examination system for future reference during subsequent CEUS procedures. (4) Preparation and administration of contrast agent: SonoVue solution was prepared by dissolving one bottle in 5 mL of normal saline, which was then thoroughly mixed before injecting 2.4 mL into an indwelling needle inserted into the left median cubital vein at a rate of 1 mL/s. Following injection, an additional 5 mL of normal saline flush was administered through the same tube. (5) Image recording and storage: Simultaneously with contrast agent administration, continuous video recording capturing CEUS images lasting at least 60 s took place; these recordings were saved in audio–video interactive (AVI) format. (6) Second CEUS procedure: on day 5 after initiation of RHES treatment, a second round of CEUS imaging was conducted following identical protocols used during initial procedure regarding patient positioning, probe angle, and other recorded parameters.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The method of locating the tCNN. In a 37-year-old male NPC patient, by referring to (A) MRI images, the (B) two-dimensional ultrasound was performed to locate the tCNN, as indicated by the red arrow.
Finally, the AVI of each CEUS was quantitatively analyzed using CHI-Q software. The procedure involved setting each tCNN as a region of interest (ROI) individually (Figure 4A). Subsequently, the ROI was analyzed to obtain the time/intensity curve (TIC) (Figure 4B), and various parameters such as peak intensity (PI), time to peak (TTP) and mean transit time (MTT) of each tCNN, respectively. According to relevant guidelines (15), two senior ultrasound physicians with over 5 years of CEUS experience, along with an engineer, were responsible for ensuring quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) during CEUS imaging and subsequent quantitative analysis.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Analyzing the AVI of CEUS by using the CHI-Q software. In a 50-year-old male NPC patient, (A) the tCNN was set as the ROI, (B) then the ROI was analyzed to obtain the time/intensity curve.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed by using the paired-samples t-test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
Baseline characteristics of patients
Among the 15 patients enrolled, there were 10 male (66.7%) and 5 female patients (33.3%). The median age of these patients was 46 years (range: 34–67 years). The median height was 170 cm (range: 149–179 cm). The median weight was 70 kg (range: 45–79 kg). WHO type IIa and IIb were identified in 1 (6.7%) and 14 (93.3%) patients, respectively. According to the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system, the stage distributions were as follows: stage III, 10 (66.7%); stage IVA, 5 (33.3%) (Table 1).
Table 1
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients.
Characteristics of tCNN
Of the 15 tCNN, 3 (20%) were in left neck level II, 9 (60%) were in right neck level II, 1 (6.7%) was in left neck level III, and 2 (13.3%) were in right neck level III. The median long diameter of the tCNN was 26.5 mm (range: 13.9–40.6 mm). The median long diameter of the necrotic areas was 13.4 mm (range: 8.2–29.1 mm). The median necrosis proportion of the TLN was 54.4% (range: 30.2%–93.3%) (Table 2).
Table 2
Table 2. Characteristics of tCNN.
Variations of CEUS parameters
The blood flow signal of the tCNN, particularly in the central region, exhibited a significant increase on day 5 (d5) following initiation of RHES treatment when compared to the day before RHES treatment (Figures 5A–D). The PI of the tCNN increased in most patients after RHES treatment initiation, with only one patient demonstrating a decrease (Figure 6A). A total of eight patients experienced a PI increase exceeding 10% in comparison to the initiation of RHES treatment (Figure 7A). The mean ± SD of PI of the tCNN on d5 and the day before (dBef) RHES treatment initiation were −44.94 ± 4.72 (dB) and −50.33 ± 6.85 (dB), respectively. Obviously, PId5 was significantly higher in comparison with PIdBef (p < 0.001; Table 3). After RHES treatment initiation, the TTP of the tCNN decreased in most patients, but increased in only two patients (Figure 6B). The TTP in six patients decreased by more than 20% (Figure 7B). The mean ± SD of TTPd5 became dramatically shorter, compared with TTPdBef [19.48 ± 3.63 (s) vs. 24.19 ± 6.93 (s), p = 0.031; Table 3]. Moreover, all but one patient had a decrease in MTT (Figure 6C). MTT in six patients decreased by more than 15% (Figure 7C). The mean ± SD of MTT dramatically decreased after RHES treatment initiation; MTTd5 and MTTdBef were 28.08 ± 3.03 (s) and 33.76 ± 6.20 (s), respectively (p = 0.001; Table 3). Overall, these results revealed that the blood volume and the blood flow velocity in the microvessels of the CNN increased after AT with RHES, indicating that AT may improve blood perfusion of CNN in NPC patients.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Variations of CEUS parameters before and after AT with RHES. In a 37-year-old male NPC patient, (A) the blood flow signal of the tCNN, especially in the central region, was dramatically increased on day 5 in comparison with (B) the day before RHES treatment. Furthermore, (C) PI on day 5 was significantly increased compared to (D) the day before RHES treatment.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Line charts of variations of CEUS parameters of the tCNN before and after AT with RHES. In most patients, (A) PId5 of the tCCN was enhanced compared to PIdBef. Meanwhile, (B, C) TTPd5 and MTTd5 of the tCNN were shorter than TTPdBef and MTTdBef, respectively.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Waterfall plots of percent change in CEUS parameters of the tCNN. In comparison with the day before AT with RHES, (A) more than half of the patients had PI increases of more than 10%. Meanwhile, (B) more than a third of patients had a reduction in TTP of more than 20%. Furthermore, (C) nearly half of the patients had a reduction in MTT of more than 15%.
Table 3
Table 3. Variations of the CEUS parameters.
Adverse effect
No adverse effect related to RHES, such as allergy, headache, arrhythmia, nausea, and fever, was observed in all 15 patients.
Discussion
The CNN is an important risk factor for treatment failure of NPC (5–7). Severe lack of blood perfusion and oxygen in the TME of the CNN reduces the sensitivity of radiation, decreases drug transportation, increases the aggressiveness of the tumor, and weakens the therapeutic effect of RT as well as chemotherapy, ultimately leading to treatment failure. Notably, several clinical studies have demonstrated that combining AT to RT and chemotherapy was effective for NPC (8, 10, 16). According to the theories proposed by Jain (11, 17) and Winkler et al. (12), AT aims not only to inhibit the formation of tumor new blood vessels but also to increase the tumor blood perfusion and remodel the TME by reconstructing the aberrant blood vessels within a specific time frame after the medication initiation, so as to relieve hypoxia and improve drug transportation. This is the so-called “vascular normalization” effect and the concept of “window”, which is a key mechanism to exert the synergistic effect of AT combined with RT and chemotherapy.
As one of the representative drugs of AT, RHES exhibits an anti-tumor effect by inhibiting the migratory capacity of endothelial cells involved in neovascularization and has gained extensive clinical application for various malignant tumors, including NPC, demonstrating remarkable efficacy and safety (18–20). Yin et al. (10) analyzed the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) plus RHES versus CCRT alone in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), and the survival data of the CCRT + RHES and CCRT groups were as follows: the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 81.4% and 63.6% (p = 0.034); the 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 88.3% and 77.3% (p = 0.049); the corresponding complete remission rates were 100% and 80.0% for lymph node necrosis (p = 0.001). These results reveal that CCRT + RHES significantly prolonged 3-year PFS and DMFS in LANPC, and the addition of RHES can enhance the regression of lymph node with necrosis. Moreover, the combined therapy of CCRT + RHES did not increase adverse effect.
In an A549 lung adenocarcinoma xenograft murine model, Li et al. (21) found that RHES induced “vascular normalization” effect in the tumor, which occurred within a specific time window from the 4th to the 10th day post-administration. Peng et al. (22) reported that RHES may normalize tumor vessels in xenografted human NPC models, with the “vascular normalization window” occurring approximately 3 to 7 days after administration. These researchers suggested that the mechanism underlying vascular normalization may be associated with the equilibrium between pro-angiogenic factors and anti-angiogenic factors, which is regulated by RHES.
Currently, histopathological criteria such as microvascular density (MVD), basal membrane thickness, and pericyte coverage rate remain the gold standards for evaluating tumor angiogenesis and tumor vascular normalization (23, 24). However, owing to its invasive nature, over-reliance on accurate sampling, and one-sidedness, evaluating vascular normalization through histopathology poses significant challenges for clinicians. With the advancement of functional imaging techniques, an increasing number of clinicians are inclined to utilize noninvasive and repeatable methods such as computed tomography perfusion imaging (CTPI), CEUS, MRI, and PET to indirectly assess tumor vascular normalization (25). Jiang et al. (26) utilized CTPI combined with 99MTCHL91 hypoxic SPECT/CT to assess the vascular normalization effect induced by RHES in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The results showed that, among the 10 NSCLC patients who received RHES treatment, capillary permeability surface initially decreased and then increased after treatment initiation, reaching its lowest point on the fifth day. Similarly, as a key marker of hypoxic imaging using SPECT/CT, the tumor-to-normal tissue radioactivity ratio revealed a similar trend. In contrast, tumor blood flow initially increased and subsequently decreased following treatment initiation, with the highest value observed on the fifth day. However, in the five patients without RHES treatment, these parameters remained unchanged. Therefore, Jiang et al. concluded that RHES had a normalizing effect on tumor blood vessels in NSCLC patients and that this “window” of vascular normalization appeared immediately upon starting RHES treatment and lasted for approximately 1 week, during which tumor blood perfusion increased and hypoxia improved.
Compared to other imaging methods, CEUS has several advantages: it does not involve radiation, offers good repeatability and real-time capability, and is cost-effective. The most significant advantage of CEUS lies in its utilization of a contrast agent composed of microbubbles with a diameter ranging from 3 to 5 µm. Unlike the iodinated and gadolinium contrast agents used in MRI and CT scans, these microbubbles are similar in size to red blood cells and belong to pure blood pool contrast agents. Consequently, they can be specifically confined within microvessels without diffusing into tissue space. This characteristic allows for the avoidance of interference caused by extravasation of the contrast agent while enabling clear and sensitive monitoring of low-speed microcirculation blood perfusion (27).
According to the introduction provided by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) (28), PI, MTT, and TTP are all listed as hemodynamic parameters. PI is defined as the maximum value of ultrasonic signal intensity, which is closely associated with the number of microbubbles in the blood vessel and reflects the blood volume of the microvessels within the ROI. TTP is defined as the time taken for the signal to reach its maximum value from its base value. MTT is defined as the average time it takes for all ultrasound contrast agents to pass through ROI. Both TTP and MTT indirectly reflect the blood flow velocity within microvessels in ROI. A comprehensive analysis of these three parameters’ dynamic changes can aid in understanding the alterations in tumor blood perfusion. Liang et al. (29) reported that CEUS parameters indirectly reflect MVD and tumor volume using a subcutaneous transplanted NPC model in nude mice, providing valuable information on angiogenesis and tumor growth. VEGF may play a role in promoting angiogenesis of NPC. Furthermore, Ling et al. (30) conducted a clinical study reporting that imaging perfusion patterns along with quantitative parameters obtained from CEUS, such as PI and TTP, provide high sensitivity and specificity when distinguishing between benign nodules and metastatic nodules located within NPC patients’ necks. These aforementioned studies indicate that CEUS holds significant potential for clinical application in evaluating tumor angiogenesis and blood perfusion.
In a previous study, CEUS was utilized for continuous monitoring of ultrasonic signal variations in the primary tumors located in the nasopharynx of NPC patients before and after AT with RHES. By analyzing the dynamic changes in CEUS parameters, significant alterations were observed within 5 days following initiation of RHES treatment, including an initial increase followed by attenuation in PI, as well as shortening and subsequent prolongation of TTP and MTT in the primary nasopharyngeal tumors. Conversely, no changes were noted in these parameters among the control group. These findings indicated that RHES induces vascular normalization within a specific period following treatment initiation, leading to increased blood perfusion in nasopharyngeal primary tumors. The underlying mechanisms through which RHES induced dynamic changes in CEUS parameters are as follows (31): upon initiation of RHES treatment, VEGF signaling is suppressed, resulting in remodeling of abnormal tumor blood vessels. This leads to thickening of the basement membrane and increased pericyte coverage. Consequently, blood vessel function improves, thereby reducing surface permeability and resistance to fluid and macromolecule flow. As a result, there is an increase in blood perfusion and volume within the neck tCNN along with accelerated blood flow velocity. These morphological and functional vascular changes are reflected accordingly on CEUS as enhanced PI accompanied by reduced TTP and MTT.
Does AT with RHES improve the blood perfusion of the CNN? The answer to this question may be the key to exert the synergistic effect of AT combined with RT and chemotherapy in NPC patients with CNN and improve their outcomes. However, the lack of blood perfusion is the hallmark pathological feature of the metastatic CNN, and the degree of vascular abnormality is necessarily much worse than that of primary tumors in the nasopharynx (5, 6). Therefore, on the basis of previous studies, we conducted this current study.
In this current study, compared to the day before AT with RHES, it was observed that the CEUS parameters (PI, TTP, and MTT) of the tCNN exhibited significant changes on day 5 after treatment initiation. In most patients, PI of the tCNN showed a significant increase, while TTP and MTT demonstrated significant decreases. These results indicate an augmentation in blood volume and blood flow velocity within the microvessels of CNN following AT, suggesting that RHES may normalize the abnormal vessels and improve blood perfusion in CNN of NPC patients, thereby alleviating hypoxia and increasing drug delivery efficiency. Furthermore, according to previous reports, the common adverse effects of RHES include allergy, headache, arrhythmia, nausea, and fever. However, no adverse effect occurred in this study, which may be related to the limited sample size and short observation time.
As a preliminary study, it has limitations such as a small sample size, the lack of external control, a short observation time, and the lack of long-term efficacy data. Because of these limitations, the results of this research must be interpreted with caution. Further prospective randomized controlled trials with a large sample size and long-term follow-up data are warranted to verify our findings.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that AT with RHES may improve blood perfusion in the CNN of NPC, thus providing valuable insights for the clinical application of AT combined with RT and/or chemotherapy in NPC patients with CNN. Moreover, CEUS as a noninvasive and real-time monitoring method may be suitable for clinically evaluating tumor blood perfusion changes.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the medical ethics committees of The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
ZY: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HX: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. ZW: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. MK: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. RW: Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. JH: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Research Foundation of the Health Department of Guangxi Province, China (No. S2018087) and the Self-Financing Foundation of the Health Department of Guangxi Province, China (No. Z20200263). The funders had no influence on the outcomes of this study.
Acknowledgments
We thank all the staff who supported our study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2018) 68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
2. Zhang MX, Li J, Shen GP, Zou X, Xu JJ, Jiang R, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy prolongs the survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy: A 10-year experience with a large cohort and long follow-up. Eur J Cancer. (2015) 51:2587–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.08.006
3. Han L, Lin SJ, Pan JJ, Chen CB, Zhang Y, Zhang XC, et al. Prognostic factors of 305 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensitymodulated radiotherapy. Chin J Cancer. (2010) 29:145–50. doi: 10.5732/cjc.009.10332
4. Luo W. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma ecology theory: cancer as multidimensional spatiotemporal “unity of ecology and evolution” pathological ecosystem. Theranostics. (2023) 13:1607–31. doi: 10.7150/thno.82690
5. Zhang LL, Zhou GQ, Li YY, Tang LL, Mao YP, Lin AH, et al. Combined prognostic value of pretreatment anemia and cervical node necrosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy: A large-scale retrospective study. Cancer Med. (2017) 6:2822–31. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2017.6.issue-12
6. Lan M, Huang Y, Chen CY, Han F, Wu SX, Tian L, et al. Prognostic value of cervical nodal necrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: analysis of 1800 patients with positive cervical nodal metastasis at MR imaging. Radiology. (2015) 276:536–44. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15141251
7. Bin Y, Meng Z, Huang LL, Hu XY, Song JM, Xie YT, et al. Prognostic value of the cervical lymph node necrosis ratio in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. (2022) 177:185–90. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.11.007
8. Lee NY, Zhang Q, Pfister DG, Kim J, Garden AS, Mechalakos J, et al. Addition of bevacizumab to standard chemoradiation for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RTOG 0615): a phase 2 multi-institutional trial. Lancet Oncol. (2012) 13:172–80. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70303-5
9. Xu L, Li D, Ji J, Chen Z, Tang X, Chen D, et al. Recombinant human endostatin injection (Endostar) combined with PF chemotherapy and sequential intensity-modulated radiotherapy is tolerable and improves prognosis of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a randomized, open, multicenter phase II clinical study. Am J Cancer Res. (2022) 12:4622–36.
10. Yin Y, Zhou Z, Li Z, Shen M, Qin Y, Yang C, et al. Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus Endostar compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study. Radiat Oncol. (2022) 17:135. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02104-4
11. Jain RK. Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy. Nat Med. (2001) 7:987–9. doi: 10.1038/nm0901-987
12. Winkler F, Kozin SV, Tong RT, Chae SS, Booth MF, Garkavtsev I, et al. Kinetics of vascular normalization by VEGFR2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: role of oxygenation, angiopoietin-1, and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Cell. (2004) 6:553–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.10.011
13. Yang Z, Kang M, Zhu S, Huang J, Li X, Wang R. Clinical evaluation of vascular normalization induced by recombinant human endostatin in nasopharyngeal carcinoma via dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Onco Targets Ther. (2018) 11:7909–17. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S181842
14. King AD, Tse GMK, Ahuja AT, Yuen EHY, Vlantis AC, To EWH, et al. Necrosis in metastatic neck nodes: diagnostic accuracy of CT, MR imaging, and US. Radiology. (2004) 230:720–6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2303030157
15. Lassau N, Chapotot L, Benatsou B, Vilgrain V, Kind M, Lacroix J, et al. Standardization of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of antiangiogenic therapies: the French multicenter Support for Innovative and Expensive Techniques Study. Invest Radiol. (2012) 47:711–6. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31826dc255
16. Jin T, Jiang F, Jin QF, Piao YF, Chen XZ. Endostar combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy for patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update. Transl Oncol. (2018) 11:286–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.01.002
17. Jain RK. Antiangiogenesis strategies revisited: from starving tumors to alleviating hypoxia. Cancer Cell. (2014) 26:605–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.10.006
18. Chen J, Yao Q, Huang M, Wang B, Zhang J, Wang T, et al. A randomized Phase III trial of neoadjuvant recombinant human endostatin, docetaxel and epirubicin as first-line therapy for patients with breast cancer (CBCRT01). Int J Cancer. (2018) 142:2130–8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.v142.10
19. Bao Y, Peng F, Zhou QC, Yu ZH, Li JC, Cheng ZB, et al. Phase II trial of recombinant human endostatin in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. (2015) 114:161–6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.039
20. Cui C, Mao L, Chi Z, Si L, Sheng X, Kong Y, et al. randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of Endostar in patients with metastatic melanoma. Mol Ther. (2013) 21:1456–63. doi: 10.1038/mt.2013.79
21. Li N, Zheng D, Wei X, Jin Z, Zhang C, Li K. Effects of recombinant human endostatin and its synergy with cisplatin on circulating endothelial cells and tumor vascular normalization in A549 xenograft murine model. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. (2012) 138:1131–44. doi: 10.1007/s00432-012-1189-z
22. Peng F, Xu Z, Wang J, Chen Y, Li Q, Zuo Y, et al. Recombinant human endostatin normalizes tumor vasculature and enhances radiation response in xenografted human nasopharyngeal carcinoma models. PloS One. (2012) 7:e34646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034646
23. Goel S, Duda DG, Xu L, Munn LL, Boucher Y, Fukumura D, et al. Normalization of the vasculature for treatment of cancer and other diseases. Physiol Rev. (2011) 91:1071–121. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00038.2010
24. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis–correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med. (1991) 324:1–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199101033240101
25. Pan JH, Zhu S, Huang J, Liang J, Zhang D, Zhao X, et al. Monitoring the process of endostar-induced tumor vascular normalization by non-contrast intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI. Front Oncol. (2018) 8:524. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00524
26. Jiang XD, Dai P, Qiao Y, Wu J, Song DA, Li SQ. Clinical study on the recombinant human endostatin regarding improving the blood perfusion and hypoxia of non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. (2012) 14:437–43. doi: 10.1007/s12094-012-0821-3
27. Wilson SR, Burns PN. Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role? Radiology. (2010) 257:24–39. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091210
28. Dietrich C, Averkiou M, Correas JM, Lassau N, Leen E, Piscaglia F. An EFSUMB introduction into dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) for quantification of tumour perfusion. Ultraschall der Med - Eur J Ultrasound. (2012) 33:344–51. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1313026
29. Liang S, Gao Y, Liu Y, Qiu C, Chen Y, Zhu S. Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in evaluating of angiogenesis and tumor staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in nude mice. PloS One. (2019) 14:e0221638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221638
30. Ling W, Nie J, Zhang D, Yang Q, Jin H, Ou X, et al. Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Front Oncol. (2020) 10:972. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00972
Keywords: antiangiogenic therapy, blood perfusion, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, cervical node with necrosis
Citation: Yang Z, Xiao H, Li X, Wei Z, Kang M, Wang R and Huang J (2025) Antiangiogenic therapy with recombinant human endostatin may improve blood perfusion of cervical node with necrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a preliminary study by using contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Front. Oncol. 15:1521762. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1521762
Received: 02 November 2024; Accepted: 13 January 2025;
Published: 31 January 2025.
Edited by:
Sharon R. Pine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, United StatesReviewed by:
Weiren Luo, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, ChinaMau-Shin Chi, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
Copyright © 2025 Yang, Xiao, Li, Wei, Kang, Wang and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jianyuan Huang, aGp5Z3htdUAxNjMuY29t
†These authors share first authorship