Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1515653

This article is part of the Research Topic Methods and Applications of Tumour Metabolic Imaging in the Preclinical and Clinical Setting View all 7 articles

Head-to-Head Comparision of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 and 18 F-FDG in Delayed PET/CT Imaging in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

Provisionally accepted
Biyao Hu Biyao Hu Haonan Yu Haonan Yu Meijie Pan Meijie Pan Yang Lailei Yang Lailei Xiling Xing Xiling Xing Shaobo Yao Shaobo Yao *QIUSONG CHEN QIUSONG CHEN
  • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Purpose: Delayed PET/CT imaging with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 is valuable in the detection of primary prostate (PCa) lesions and the differentiation of suspicious lesions. However, 18 F-FDG PET/CT has been overlooked due to its low sensitivity to PCa during routine examination. This study aimed to compare the clinical impact of PSMA and FDG in delayed PET/CT imaging in PCa diagnosis.Methods: Between 2019 and 2024, 65 PCa patients who underwent early (1 h postinjection) and delayed (3 h p.i.) PSMA and FDG scans were retrospectively analyzed.The delayed scans were conducted to clarify unclear findings in early scans or to increase the tumor lesions uptake in negative early scans.All patients were asked to drink 1 L of water between early and delayed scans.The number of primary and metastatic lesions, sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, lesions changes in SUVmax of early and delayed scans were evaluated. Correlation between SUVmax and Gleason score as well as SUVmax and PSA for PCa primary lesions diagnosis were analyzed.Results:Overall, 83 and 84 lesions characteristic for PCa in 65 patients clearly presented at 1 h and 3 h p.i. in PSMA scans, respectively. 30 and 45 lesions characteristic for PCa in 65 patients clearly presented at 1 h and 3 h p.i. in FDG scans.The 3-hour delayed imaging of FDG found more primary foci than 1-hour imaging, but was much less able to detect metastatic foci than PSMA. PSMA was more sensitive than FDG in delayed imaging (96.15% vs. 84.21%), and the diagnostic accuracy for primary foci was higher for PSMA than FDG in delayed imaging (83.87% vs. 73.91%).However, FDG delayed imaging greatly improved the diagnostic accuracy for primary PCa compared to early imaging (73.91% vs.53.33%). PSMA SUVmax of both 1 h and 3 h p.i. were correlated with the Gleason score PSA, but FDG SUVmax only showed a correlation with PSA at 3 h p.i..PSMA PET/CT at 3 h p.i. detected the most lesions characteristic of primary PCa, and it showed higher uptake and contrast than FDG.However, to some extent, FDG delayed PET/CT imaging is still important in primary PCa diagnosis, 3 / 18 particularly in hospitals without PSMA.

    Keywords: prostate cancer, PET/CT, 68 Ga-PSMA-11, 18 F-FDG, Delayed imaging

    Received: 23 Oct 2024; Accepted: 14 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Hu, Yu, Pan, Lailei, Xing, Yao and CHEN. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Shaobo Yao, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more