The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Cancers
Volume 15 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1510342
This article is part of the Research Topic Novel Approaches in the Management of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Cancer View all 4 articles
Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy vesus laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of General Surgery, Dongxiang District People's Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- 2 Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Dongxiang District People's Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- 3 Department of Molecular Diagnostics & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, California, United States
- 4 General Surgery Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China
We aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (L-RAMPS) versus laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy (L-DPS) for left-sided pancreatic cancer through a meta-analysis.A systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, were performed. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase for studies published from their inception up to June 14th, 2024.A total of three retrospective studies involving 242 patients were included in this meta-analysis, with 116 patients in the L-RAMPS group and 126 in the L-DPS group. The meta-analysis results indicated that L-RAMPS was associated with the retrieval of more lymph nodes (MD: 3.06; 95% CI: 2.51 to 3.62, p < 0.00001) and longer operative time (MD: 20.05; 95% CI: 13.97 to 26.12, p < 0.00001) compared to L-DPS for leftsided pancreatic cancer patients. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of R0 resection margins, the incidence of pancreatic fistula (Grade B and C), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, or postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Grades II and III).In patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer, L-RAMPS resulted in the retrieval of more lymph nodes, a longer operative time, and a similar incidence of postoperative complications compared to L-DPS. Larger sample sizes, extended follow-up periods, and well-conducted randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate these findings.
Keywords: Laparoscopic, radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy, Pancreatic Cancer, Distal pancreatosplenectomy, Meta-analysis
Received: 12 Oct 2024; Accepted: 24 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Jiang, Zhu, Li, Li, Zheng, Xu and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yu Zhu, Department of General Surgery, Dongxiang District People's Hospital, Fuzhou, China
Jianwei Li, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Dongxiang District People's Hospital, Fuzhou, China
Wei Li, Department of General Surgery, Dongxiang District People's Hospital, Fuzhou, China
Weizong Zheng, Department of General Surgery, Dongxiang District People's Hospital, Fuzhou, China
Guixin Zhang, General Surgery Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.