![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1510071
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To investigate the predictive value of radiomics models based on intra-tumoral ecological diversity (iTED) and temporal characteristics for assessing microvascular invasion (MVI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).We retrospectively analyzed the data of 398 HCC patients who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA (training set: 318; testing set: 80). The tumors were segmented into five distinct habitats using case-level clustering and a Gaussian mixture model was used to determine the optimal clusters based on the Bayesian information criterion to produce an iTED feature vector for each patient, which was used to assess intra-tumoral heterogeneity.Radiomics models were developed using iTED features from the arterial phase (AP), portal venous phase (PVP), and hepatobiliary phase (HBP), referred to as MiTED-AP, MiTED-PVP, and MiTED-HBP, respectively. Additionally, temporal features were derived by subtracting the PVP features from the AP features, creating a delta-radiomics model (MDelta). Conventional radiomics features were also extracted from the AP, PVP, and HBP images, resulting in three models: MCVT-AP, MCVT-PVP, and MCVT-HBP. A clinical-radiological model (CR model) was constructed, and two fusion models were generated by combining the radiomics or/and CR models using a stacking algorithm (fusion_R and fusion_CR). Model performance was evaluated using AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.Results: The MDelta model demonstrated higher sensitivity compared to the MCVT-AP and MCVT-PVP models. No significant differences in performance were observed across different imaging phases for either conventional radiomics (p = 0.096-0.420) or iTED features (p = 0.106-0.744). Similarly, for images from the same phase, we found no significant differences between the performance of conventional radiomics and iTED features (AP: p = 0.158; PVP: p = 0.844; HBP: p = 0.157). The fusion_R and fusion_CR models enhanced MVI discrimination, achieving AUCs of 0.823 (95% CI: 0.816-0.831) and 0.830 (95% CI: 0.824-0.835), respectively.Delta radiomics features are temporal and predictive of MVI, providing additional predictive information for MVI beyond conventional AP and PVP features. The iTED features provide an alternative perspective in interpreting tumor characteristics and hold the potential to replace conventional radiomics features to some extent for MVI prediction.
Keywords: intra-tumoral heterogeneity, Temporal features, Microvascular invasion, Radiomics, ensemble learning
Received: 18 Oct 2024; Accepted: 10 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zeng, Wu, Zhu, Li, Du, Song, Su, Qin and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Huiqin Wu, Department of Medical Imaging, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
Yanqiu Zhu, Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Chao Li, Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Sulian Su, Department of Radiology, Xiamen Humanity Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China
Jie Qin, Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Gui-Hua Jiang, Department of Medical Imaging, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.