data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Radiation Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1509619
This article is part of the Research Topic Innovative Approaches in Precision Radiation Oncology View all 4 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: This study aims to investigate the feasibility of fan-beam computed tomography (FBCT)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) in radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer.Methods: Ten patients who underwent radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer were enrolled in this study. All patients received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with a prescription dose of 50.4 Gy/28f, and daily oART with FBCT guidance was performed. Dosimetric analysis was conducted on 278 fractions, comparing the adaptive and scheduled plans. The γ passing rate was measured through in-vivo dose monitoring during treatment, using a 3%/3mm gamma criterion with an 88% threshold for alerts. The time invested in the oART workflow was recorded at each step. Acute toxicities were classified following the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.Results: The adaptive plans demonstrated a dosimetric advantage in target coverage and/or organs at risk (OARs) sparing across all 278 fractions. Compared to the scheduled plan, the adaptive plan showed improved dose received by 95% (D95) of planning target volume (PTV), conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) (P<0.001). Among the three PTVs, the PTV of uterus (PTV_U) benefited most from dosimetric improvements in the adaptive plan, followed by the PTV of cervix, vagina, and parametrial tissues (PTV_C), while the PTV of lymph node (PTV_N) exhibited the least enhancement. For OARs, the adaptive plan achieved reductions in the dose to the most irradiated 2 cm³ volume (D2cc) for the rectum, bladder, and small intestine (P<0.001). For patients with ovarian conservation, the dose to the 50% volume (D50) and the mean dose of the bilateral ovaries were decreased (P<0.001). The mean γ passing rate across all fractions was 99.24%. The mean duration of the oART workflow was 22.82±3.61 min, with auto-segmentation & review (44.40%) and plan generation & evaluation (22.02%) being the most time-intensive steps. The incidence of Grade 1-2 acute non-hematological toxicity was 60%, with no cases of Grade 3 or higher observed.Conclusions: The implementation of FBCT-guided oART in radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer was feasible. This approach has shown significant improvements in dose distribution and the potential to provide clinical benefits by reducing acute toxicity.
Keywords: Online adaptive radiotherapy (oART), cervical cancer, Fan-beam computed tomography (FBCT), image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), Dosimetric distribution, acute toxicity
Received: 11 Oct 2024; Accepted: 03 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sun, Gong, LIANG, Sun, Que, Xie, He, He, Liang, Wang, Wu, Wang, Yang, Qiu, Hu and ZHANG. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ke Hu, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CAMS), Beijing, China
Fuquan ZHANG, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CAMS), Beijing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.