
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Gynecological Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1506639
This article is part of the Research Topic Prognostic Biomarkers and Gene Signatures in Endometrial, Ovarian, and Cervical Cancer View all 7 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: To evaluate whether molecular classification was associated with treatment response and recurrence in women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) treated with progestin.Methods: A retrospective analysis of 116 patients (71 AEH and 45 EC) who received fertilitysparing therapy between 2010 and 2022 was performed. Tumors were classified via immunohistochemistry and gene sequencing into four subgroups: POLE-mutated (POLEmut), p53 wild type (p53 wt/NSMP), mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), and p53-abnormal (p53abn). The primary outcome was complete response (CR) to hormonal therapy. Secondary outcomes included the recurrence rate after CR and conception success. The treatment response to progestin and recurrence rate were compared across four subgroups.Results: Of 116 patients, 10 (8.62%) were classified as POLEmut, 81 (69.82%) p53 wt, 9 (7.76%) p53abn, 16 (13.76%) MMRd. At 12 months evaluation, 87 patients (75.00%) achieved CR (median treatment duration: 5.95 months; range: 1.6-12.9). Partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) rates were 6.89% (n=8), 1.72% (n=2), and 16.38% (n=19), respectively.Patients with the p53abn and MMRd subtype had a lower CR rate (33.33%, 37.50%) and a higher progression rate (44.40%, 37.50%) compared to other subgroups (P<0.05). After 24-month follow-up, recurrence rates were markedly higher in p53abn (100%) and MMRd (83.33%) versus POLEmut (33.33%) and p53 wt (17.39%) subgroups (P<0.05). Among 56 (64.37%) patients attempting conception, the pregnancy rate of 38 patients who received in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer was 47.37%(18/38), and the pregnancy rate of 18 patients who chose natural pregnancy was 16.67%(3/18), showing no statistical difference (P=0.072).Conclusion: Molecular classification may be associated with hormonal treatment response in patients with AEH and EC patients with POLEmut and p53wt had better progestin response, MMRd and p53abn had the poorest response and the highest recurrence rate. Recurrence was common after CR, and close review was necessary. For further investigating the role of molecular classification in fertility-sparing treatment of AEH/EC , larger prospective studies were necessary.
Keywords: Early-stage endometrial cancer, Atypical endometrial hyperplasia, fertilitysparing treatment, Molecular classification, complete response, partial response, progression disease
Received: 05 Oct 2024; Accepted: 24 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Lai, Chu, Bai, Yan and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ruixia Guo, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.