Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Thoracic Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1506041
This article is part of the Research Topic EGFR-TKIs for Lung Cancer Treatment: Development, Application, and Side Effects View all 12 articles

Targeted treatment and survival in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patientsa nationwide and longitudinal study

Provisionally accepted
Johanne Elise Nyen Johanne Elise Nyen 1*Anja Ødegård Booth Anja Ødegård Booth 2Øyvind Husby Øyvind Husby 3Christoffer Bugge Christoffer Bugge 1Ingrid Engebretsen Ingrid Engebretsen 1Francisco Oteiza Francisco Oteiza 1Åslaug Helland Åslaug Helland 4Lars Fjellbirkeland Lars Fjellbirkeland 4Odd Terje Brustugun Odd Terje Brustugun 4Bjørn Henning Grønberg Bjørn Henning Grønberg 5
  • 1 Oslo Economics AS, Oslo, Norway
  • 2 AstraZeneca AS, Oslo, Norway
  • 3 Pfizer AS, Oslo, Norway
  • 4 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 5 Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Sør-Trøndelag, Norway

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    We aimed to describe treatment patterns, time on treatment (ToT) and overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced non-squamous, EGFR+, ALK+ and ROS1+ NSCLC in Norway.We extracted data on patients ≥ 18 years diagnosed with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC between 2015 and 2022 from the Cancer Registry of Norway and data on cancer drug therapy from the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Prescribed Drug Registry. ToT was measured from the date treatment was collected or administered until the last dispensing was depleted or last hospital drug administration. OS was measured from date of diagnosis until death.Results: In total, 5,279 patients were included, of whom 449 EGFR+, 131 ALK+ and 38 ROS1+. 75% of EGFR+ patients, 88% of ALK+ patients, and 58% of ROS1+ patients received at least one systemic treatment within the first three months after diagnosis. Median follow-up was 13, 19, and 4 months for EGFR+, ALK+, and ROS1+, respectively. The median ToT in first line (1L) for EGFR+ patients was 11 months for osimertinib (CI: 10.1-NA) and 9 months (CI: 8.2-11.2) for afatinib, dacomitinib, erlotinib and gefitinib. For ALK+ patients, median ToT in 1L was 20 months (CI: 14.7-23.7for alectinib, 11 months (CI: 4.7-NA) for brigatinib, and 7 months (CI: 2.9-21.6) for crizotinib. For the five ROS1+ patients treated with crizotinib in 1L, median ToT was 5 months (CI: 2.4-NA). For all patients with a targetable genomic alteration, unadjusted median OS was higher (p-value = 0.025) for patients diagnosed in 2020-2022 (median OS: 23 months, CI: 19.5-NA) compared to patients diagnosed in 2015-2019 (median: 19 months, CI: 16.5-21.2).Conclusions: ToT for targeted therapies was shorter than progression-free survival in clinical trials. However, patients eligible for targeted therapy still had a survival improvement during the study period.

    Keywords: ROS, ALK, EGFR, Real world data, lung cancer, Time on treatment

    Received: 04 Oct 2024; Accepted: 03 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Nyen, Ødegård Booth, Husby, Bugge, Engebretsen, Oteiza, Helland, Fjellbirkeland, Brustugun and Grønberg. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Johanne Elise Nyen, Oslo Economics AS, Oslo, Norway

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.