
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Breast Cancer
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1501667
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Evaluation of every breast cancer (BC) patient by multidisciplinary team and application of guidelines are very important to ensure the best treatment and achieve the best outcome.The multicenter prospective observational BRIDE study enrolled, from 01/2018 to 02/2021, 1633 BC patients from 19 Italian cancer centers. To evaluate the clinical and biopathological characteristics of BC patients with pathological stage I-II-III treated with surgery followed by adjuvant systemic therapy, type of therapies delivered, outcome and adherence to guidelines, an analysis of 1123 patients out of 1633 patients enrolled in BRIDE study was conducted.The 1123 patients with stage I-II-III BC had a median age of 61.2 years (Q1-Q3: 50.6-71.7); 70.2% were postmenopausal, 92.1% had ECOG PS 0, 68.4% pT1 disease, 70.7% pN0, 91.7% pathological stage I-II; 68.9% underwent conservative breast surgery and 79.8% sentinel lymph node biopsy alone. According to phenotypic subgroup, 80.6% of patients had a HER2-negative/HR-positive, 10.4% HER2-positive/HR-positive, 6.4% triple negative and 2.6% HER2-positive/HR-negative BC. In clinical practice, the phenotypic tumoral subgroup influenced oncologists in the choice of the type of adjuvant systemic therapy (p<0.0001) according to ESMO and AIOM Guidelines. Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to 85.5% patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. At the median follow up of 41.4 months (Q1: 35.3 months -Q3: 57.9 months), the DFS at 48 months was 92.8%, with different rates in the phenotypic subgroups. The adherence to AIOM Guidelines in clinical practice was ≥ 70% for the four evaluated quality indicators of treatment process.In patients with pathological stage I-II-III BC, the phenotypic subgroup influenced the oncologists' decision on the choice of type of adjuvant systemic therapy, as also indicated by international and national guidelines. In our patients, the DFS rate at 24 and 48 months after surgery was 95.4% and 92.8% respectively. The adherence to the AIOM Guidelines in clinical practice was high but having both quality indicators (shared at international and national level) to evaluate the quality of care in BC and standardized threshold levels to evaluate adherence to guidelines is very important today because this type of evaluation will increase in the coming years.
Keywords: Adjuvant systemic therapy, Early breast cancer, Outcome, Adherence to guideline, Quality indicators
Received: 25 Sep 2024; Accepted: 19 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gori, Fabi, Angiolini, Turazza, Salvini, Ferretti, Cretella, Gianni, Bighin, Toss, Zamagni, Vici, De Rossi, Russo, Bisagni, Schirone, Borgato, Cariello, Cappelletti, Bordonaro, Cinieri, Modena, Valerio, Alvisi, De Simone, Galli, Rulli, Santoni, Verzè and Nicolis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Stefania Gori, Medical Oncology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.