Skip to main content

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Colorectal Cancer

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1450602

A randomized phase 2/3 trial of rosuvastatin with neoadjuvant chemo-radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Digestive Diseases & Clinical Nutrition, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • 2 Department of surgical oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • 3 Department of Surgical oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
  • 4 Homi Bhabha National Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • 5 Project Associate II, , Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • 6 Homi Bhabha national Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • 7 Department of Pathology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • 8 Department of Anaesthesiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • 9 Laboratory of Chromatin Biology & Epigenetics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, Pune, Maharashtra, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Aim: Statins have shown to improve the possibility of a pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer when given in combination with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACTRT) in observational studies. The primary objective of this phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to determine the impact of rosuvastatin in improving pCR rates in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, who are undergoing NACTRT. The secondary objectives are to compare adverse events, postoperative morbidity and mortality and disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival in the two arms and to identify potential prognostic and predictive factors determining outcomes. If the study is positive, we plan to proceed to a phase III RCT with 3 year DFS as the primary end point.Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, open label phase II/III study. The phase II study has a sample size of 316 patients (158 in each arm) to be accrued over 3 years to have 288 evaluable patients. The standard arm will receive NACTRT while the intervention group will receive 20 mg Rosuvastatin orally once daily along with NACTRT for 6 weeks followed by rosuvastatin alone for 6-10 weeks till surgery. All patients will be reviewed after repeat imaging in a multidisciplinary tumor board at 12-16 weeks after starting NACTRT and operable patients will be planed for surgery . The pathological response rate and tumor regression grade (TRG) as well as post-surgical complications will be recorded.The addition of rosuvastatin to NACTRT may improve the oncological outcomes by increasing the likelihood of pCR in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing NACTRT. This would be a low cost, low risk intervention which could potentially lead to refinement of strategies like 'watch and wait' subsequently in a select subgroup of patients.

    Keywords: Rosuvastatin, Pathological complete response, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, rectal cancer, drug repurposing

    Received: 17 Jun 2024; Accepted: 18 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Patil, Saklani, Kumar AN, De Souza, Krishnatry, Khanvilkar, Kazi, Engineer, Ostwal, Ramaswamy, Bal, Ranganathan and Galande. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Prachi S Patil, Department of Digestive Diseases & Clinical Nutrition, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, 400 012, Maharashtra, India

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more