CASE REPORT article

Front. Oncol., 17 February 2025

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Colorectal Cancer

Volume 15 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1444149

This article is part of the Research TopicThe microbiome in surgery - friend or foe?View all 8 articles

Case report: A case report and literature review on spontaneous bacterial peritonitis induced by intestinal barrier damage in a colorectal cancer patient with malnutrition

Peng Xu&#x;Peng XuSanbao Shi&#x;Sanbao ShiZhiyu YuZhiyu YuDa Li*Da Li*Cheng Zhang*Cheng Zhang*
  • Department of General Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, China

Background: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is an infectious condition characterizing the presence of bacterial infection in the peritoneal fluid with no apparent source of infection within the abdomen. It is extremely rare for patients with malnutrition after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery to develop SBP. This is the first ever case reported case of SBP resulting from intestinal barrier compromise in a patient with colorectal cancer with malnutrition.

Case summary: A 72-year-old woman with malnutrition was diagnosed with CRC, and following brief nutritional support, she underwent the laparoscopic-assisted radical right hemicolectomy. The patient was then diagnosed with peritonitis after the operation. An emergency laparotomy was performed, and the patient was finally diagnosed with SBP. The patient ultimately recovered following a series of appropriate postoperative supportive treatments.

Conclusion: This case highlights the poor outcomes of short preoperative nutritional therapy in CRC patients with malnutrition. Further studies should investigate the role of the intestinal barrier function in the recovery of patients with CRC after surgery.

1 Introduction

Severe malnutrition results in intestinal villus blunting and compromises intestinal barrier function, which facilitates microbial translation, inducing systemic inflammation, potentially leading to sepsis (1). Moreover, chronic malnutrition-driven dysbiosis is characterized by an increased proportion of gram-negative bacteria, resulting in endotoxemia and the subsequent leakage of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (2). Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) arises from ascitic fluid infection without an evident intra-abdominal source, such as the gastrointestinal tract or other areas within the abdomen (3). Impaired intestinal barrier function and bacterial translocation (BT) are major clinical features in the pathogenesis of SBP (4). Therefore, malnutrition is known to promote the translocation of intestinal bacteria, and can potentially induce SBP. Here, we report a case of primary peritonitis in a patient with colorectal cancer (CRC) and malnutrition, resulting from intestinal barrier damage, and review literature to assess the interplay among peritonitis, malnutrition, and intestinal barrier damage.

2 Case presentation

The timeline of the patient’s disease is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The timeline of the patient’s disease.

2.1 Support therapy before surgery treatment

A 72-year-old female diagnosed with ‘bacterial pneumonia’ was admitted to the local hospital on 12 February 2023. The patients had an 8-year neurosis history and had been given olanzapine and paroxetine hydrochloride oral treatment. An admission examination revealed gastrointestinal bleeding. Colonoscopy revealed an irregular mucosal elevation around the circumference about 80cm from the anus (ascending colon near the ileocecal valve), characterized by an ulcerated and uneven surface, covered with exudates, and exhibiting bleeding and erosion. The tissues appeared fragile and bled easily upon contact. Pathologic diagnosis was ‘high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (colon), intraepithelial carcinoma (intramucosal carcinoma)’. The patient subsequently presented to our hospital for additional surgical intervention on 14 March 2023. The body mass index (BMI) of the patient was 17.58 kg/m2 (height: 1.6 m, weight: 45 kg). The patient lost 30 kg weight in the last 2 years. According to the ESPEN recommendations, the patient was diagnosed with malnutrition (5). Abdomen computed tomography (CT, routine & enhanced scan) showed the thickening of the ascending colon duct wall and the presence of multiple surrounding lymph nodes (Figures 2A, B). The hemoglobin (HGB) and hematocrit (HCT) of the patient were 59 g/L and 0.197 L/L. Prealbumin (PA) was 215.8 mg/L and albumin (ALB) was 32.5 g/L. After a week of treatment with blood transfusions and nutritional support therapy, there was a significant improvement in patients’ anemia and nutritional status (HGB:105 g/L, HCT:0.327 L/L, PA:230.2 mg/L, ALB:33.6 g/L) (Supplementary Figures S1, S2). After the preoperative preparation, the patient proceeded to undergo laparoscopic-assisted radical right hemicolectomy under general anesthesia on 21 March 2023. The postoperative pathological diagnosis revealed no involvement of lymph nodes. The grade for the CRC was T4aN0M0 IIB. The body temperature and levels of inflammatory markers during hospitalization are listed in Supplementary Table S1, Supplementary Figure S3.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. On 15 March 2023, CT showed the thickening of ascending colon duct wall with multiple surrounding lymph nodes. (A) Plain scan of abdominal CT image. (B) Enhancement scan of abdominal CT image.

2.2 Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis after surgery

On the 3rd (24 March 2023) postoperative day, the patient began to flatus for four times and had a bowel movement, and then was fed with full fluids. Concurrent with other treatments, Bacillus licheniformis was administered orally to modulate the gut microbiota. The patient experienced intermittent fever, reaching a maximum temperature of 38°C in the postoperative period. Hence, a comprehensive CT scan of the lung and the whole abdomen was performed on 26 March 2023, which revealed no obvious abnormality in the abdominal cavity (Figures 3A, B). Moreover, pelvic cavity assessment revealed no fluid accumulation (Figure 3C). The abdominal drainage tube was subsequently removed. On the 6th postoperative night (27 March 2023), the patient experienced diarrhea six times (each time expelling approximately 100 ml) and subsequently developed abnormal liver and kidney functions. The patient was administered rehydration and other symptomatic treatments. Over the subsequent 2 days, the patient experienced intermittent low fevers, with temperatures not exceeding 38°C. On the 8th day (29 March 2023), the patient got a fever, with a body temperature of 38.5°C. A complete blood count (CBC) was conducted (Supplementary Table S1), and levels of inflammatory markers were measured as follows: Procalcitonin (PCT) 10.87 ng/mL, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) 337.73 pg/mL, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hCRP) 144.8 mg/L. Blood cultures were additionally performed. A 10 mL blood sample was drawn from the patient, and B. licheniformis was identified within 23 h. Imipenem was subsequently administered to treat the infection. CT on the 9th postoperative day (30 March 2023) revealed the abdominal abscess and pelvic effusion (Figures 4B, C). However, there were no significant signs of inflammation in the lungs (Figure 4A). Physical examination demonstrated generalized abdominal tenderness and the presence of rebound pain in the patient. The heart rate of patient was 98 beat per minute (bpm), the blood pressure was 152/67 mmHg, and the oxygen saturation was 98%. The patient had symptoms of infection and was then diagnosed with peritonitis. Considering the possibility of an anastomotic fistula, an urgent exploratory laparotomy was performed. Intraoperatively, a significant quantity of purulent exudate and fibrinous deposits was found coating the small intestine in the abdominal cavity, and approximately 50 mL of purulent fluid was aspirated from the pelvis and transferred to a blood culture bottle for enrichment. The polymorphonuclear (PMN) count in the ascitic fluid exceeded 250 cells per mm3, although the fluid culture ultimately yielded no growth. Moreover, exploration of the anastomosis revealed no abnormalities. As a result, abdominal lavage and drainage were conducted. Postoperatively, the patient was transferred to the emergency intensive care unit on 30 March 2023. Finally, the patient was diagnosed as an SBP based on established diagnostic criteria (6).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. On 26 March 2023, CT showed no obvious abnormality in the lungs, abdominal and pelvic cavity. (A) Chest routine scan of CT image. (B) Abdomen routine scan of CT image. (C) Pelvic routine scan of CT image.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. On 30 March 2023, CT showed the abdominal abscess and pelvic effusion were formatted. (A) Chest routine scan of CT image. (B) Abdomen routine scan of CT image. (C) Pelvic routine scan of CT image.

2.3 Adjuvant treatment after second surgery

After 2 days (1 April 2023), the patient was transferred back to the general surgery department. Within the initial 4 days, the patient exhibited intermittent fever, with the maximum temperature reaching 38°C. The patient was able to tolerate a small amount of water without experiencing abdominal pain and bloating, and there was no defecation, and three abdominal drains without fluid drainage. The bacterial/fungal culture of blood was performed on 4 April 2023 and the results were negative. The fecal coccus-to-bacillus ratio on 5 April 2023 was 1:1. On 6 April 2023, the patient passed approximately 200 ml of dark red, bloody stool. Related indicators of coagulation were: prothrombin time (PT) 26.9s; international standardized ratio (INR) 2.46; prothrombin activity (PTA) 29%; activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) 79.8 s; D-dimer 8.48mg/L FEU. Antibiotic treatment was then altered to omadacycline, caspofungin acetate, and tinidazole after consulting the clinical pharmacist. Moreover, the vancomycin was administered orally. Ten days after the second surgery, the CT plain scan was checked on 9 April 2023. CT showed that the abdominal abscess had resolved, and the pelvic fluid accumulation had reduced (Supplementary Figures S4A, B). Finally, all three drainage tubes were progressively removed over the subsequent 8 days, leading to the recovery of the patient (17 April 2023).

3 Discussion

CRC is still one of the most prevalent cancers and a major cause of the global rise in cancer-related deaths (7). With the advent of new surgical instruments and methods, as well as the exponential growth of robotic surgery, the surgical treatment of CRC has changed over the past 10 years (8). Postoperative recovery efforts, primarily directed at interventions and intraoperative factors, contribute significantly to enhancing patient outcomes after surgery (9). The key characteristics associated with CRC include low food intake, impaired nutrient absorption, and heightened systemic inflammation are key characteristics associated with CRC, leading to a state of increased catabolism and decreased anabolism, which defines malnutrition (10). Previous studies on gastric cancer have shown shorter survival among patients with malnutrition before surgery (11). Malnutrition rates among patients with CRC might range from 20% to 37%, depending on the method used for nutritional status assessment (12). Malnutrition is an independent risk factor of CRC, which is associated with poorer clinical outcomes for patients (13). In addition, malnutrition and low muscle mass are independently associated with poor outcomes in affected patients (13). Xinying Wang et al. demonstrated a correlation between the PG-SGA score and the prediction of post-operative infection in patients with CRC (14). Patients with CRC commonly face nutritional risk or malnutrition, exacerbated by the physiological stress of surgery (15). Malnutrition significantly affects their tolerance of treatment, and contributes to postoperative complications, including anastomotic leakage (AL), which in turn impacts oncological outcomes (16). In the current case, the occurrence of SBP following colorectal surgery in a malnourished patient was relatively uncommon, moreover, no common postoperative complications (such as AL) were observed.

3.1 Reasons underlying the development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis after operation

Chloé Magnan et al. observed a significant reduction in both the abundance as well as the diversity of the gut microbiota following digestive surgery, with a concomitant significant increase in the abundance of the genus Enterococcus (17). Our patient underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical right hemicolectomy. Previous studies showed that the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) is as low as 2.1% when compared to open laparotomy surgery (18). Probiotics therapy post-surgery has been demonstrates significantly reduced levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in blood serum and alleviates side effects following CRC surgery (19). Probiotic and symbiotic therapies have been proven to enhance recovery of patients after CRC surgery through the reduction in intestinal permeability and lowering the incidence of infection (20). Although our patient took B. licheniformis orally after surgery, the occurrence of SBP could not be prevented. The pathogenesis of SBP involves impaired intestinal barrier function, potentially exacerbated by BT and malnutrition. BT characterizes the translocation of intestinal microbes and their products from the intestinal lumen to sterile sites, including circulating blood, mesenteric lymph nodes, abdominal cavity, and internal organs (21). Impaired intestinal integrity is associated with BT-mediated systemic inflammation and sepsis consequently leading to clinical deterioration and possible death (1). The blood culture with B. licheniformis in blood also demonstrated the impairment of the intestinal barrier and BT.

Finally, an impaired intestinal barrier and BT can result in SBP in patients. A earlier study showed markedly increased intestinal aerobic bacterial count due to BT and SBP (22). In our patient, overgrowth of intestinal bacteria was associated with an increased risk of the BT and SBP; therefore, oral administration of vancomycin was effective following the second operation. Apart from malnutrition, severe anemia is negatively correlated with the intestinal barrier and is known to trigger BT, co-occurs with CRC and was identified in our patient (23). Moreover, BT is reported to be more frequent in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN) or postoperatively (24), mainly due to the compromised integrity of the intestinal barrier during the TPN therapy (24). Malnutrition and anemia jointly contribute to the intestinal barrier impairment, which in turn leads to the occurrence of SBP.

3.2 Clinical value of malnutrition in intestinal barrier

The intestinal mucosa is located in the innermost layer of the digestive tract. It consists of the epithelium, the lamina propria, and the muscularis mucosae (25), and acts as the intestinal barrier to regulate intestinal homeostasis (26). Dietary components interact with the intestinal lumen and have been found to regulate intestinal permeability (27). Malnutrition refers to a deficiency in energy, protein, and other nutrients that results in observable negative effects on tissue and body form (body shape, size, and composition), function, and clinical outcome (28). Jacobi et al. demonstrated that malnutrition is linked to a significant decrease in villus height and transepithelial electrical resistance (29). Consistently, caloric restriction and undernutrition also result in villus atrophy (30). Moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) has been demonstrated to elevate systemic inflammation of mice and is associated with increased bioactivity of BT and bacterial LPS in the intestine, ultimately leading to inflammatory responses (2). Another study also showed that the malnutrition-enteric diet is associated with an increased Lactulose: Mannitol ratio (LM) and a reduction in the villous area of the intestinal epithelial barrier (31). Maghraby et al. demonstrated that low-protein diet induced intestinal villus atrophy and compromised the intestinal barrier (32). Moreover, the levels of CLD-3 and CLD-4 proteins also reduce, while occludin level is enhanced, and mitochondrial function is impaired in response to LPD in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) (1). Disruption of the epithelial barrier allows bacteria and bacterial components to enter the epithelium, initiating immunological responses (33). The integrity of the intestinal barrier is crucial for mitigating postoperative complications. Indeed, patients with malnutrition could benefit from appropriate nutritional support to improve the intestinal barrier function prior to CRC surgery.

4 Conclusion

This case demonstrated SBP resulting from intestinal barrier compromise in a patient with malnutrition following surgery for CRC. Further research should focus on the role of intestinal barrier function in the postoperative recovery of patients with CRC. Additionally, the integrity of the intestinal barrier is crucial for patients undergoing surgery for CRC.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics committee of General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

PX: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ZY: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was financially supported by Liaoning province livelihood science and technology joint plan (2021JH2/10300106).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1444149/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1 | Levels of serum RBC, HGB, and HCT before operation. (A) Levels of serum RBC. (B) Levels of serum HGB. (C) Levels of serum HCT.

Supplementary Figure 2 | Levels of serum PA, ALB, and TP before operation. (A) Levels of serum PA. (B) Levels of serum ALB. (C) Levels of serum TP.

Supplementary Figure 3 | Levels of inflammatory markers and the body temperature. (A) Levels of WBC. (B) Levels of NEU. (C) Levels of PCT. (D) Body temperature of the patient.

Supplementary Figure 4 | On 9 April 2023, CT showed that the abdominal abscess had disappeared, and pelvic fluid accumulation was reduced. (A) Abdomen routine scan of CT image. (B) Pelvic routine scan of CT image.

Supplementary Table 1 | The levels of inflammatory markers in serum during the case.

Abbreviations

AL, Anastomotic leakage; ALB, Albumin; APTT, Activated partial thromboplastin time; bpm, beat per minute; BT, Bacterial translocation; BMI, Body mass index; CBC, Complete blood count; CRC, Colorectal cancer; GC, Gastric cancer; hCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HCT, Hematocrit; HGB, Hemoglobin; IECs, Intestinal epithelial cells; INR, International standardized ratio; LM, Lactulose: mannitol ratio; LPS, Lipopolysaccharide; MAL-ED, Malnutrition-enteric; MAM, Moderate acute malnutrition; PMN, Polymorphonuclear; PA, Prealbumin; PCT, Procalcitonin; PT, Prothrombin time; PTA, Prothrombin activity; SBP, Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; SSI, Surgical site infection; TPN, Total parenteral nutrition.

References

1. Ling C, Versloot CJ, Arvidsson Kvissberg ME, Hu G, Swain N, Horcas-Nieto JM, et al. Rebalancing of mitochondrial homeostasis through an NAD(+)-SIRT1 pathway preserves intestinal barrier function in severe malnutrition. EBioMedicine. (2023) 96:104809. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104809

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Patterson GT, Osorio EY, Peniche A, Dann SM, Cordova E, Preidis GA, et al. Pathologic inflammation in malnutrition is driven by proinflammatory intestinal microbiota, large intestine barrier dysfunction, and translocation of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:846155. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.846155

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Zhang G, Jazwinski Faust A. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. JAMA. (2021) 325:1118. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.10292

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Maccauro V, Airola C, Santopaolo F, Gasbarrini A, Ponziani FR, Pompili M. Gut microbiota and infectious complications in advanced chronic liver disease: focus on spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Life (Basel). (2023) 13(4):991. doi: 10.3390/life13040991

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bellanti F, Lo Buglio A, Quiete S, Vendemiale G. Malnutrition in hospitalized old patients: screening and diagnosis, clinical outcomes, and management. Nutrients. (2022) 14(4):910. doi: 10.3390/nu14040910

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Dever JB, Sheikh MY. Review article: spontaneous bacterial peritonitis–bacteriology, diagnosis, treatment, risk factors and prevention. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2015) 41:1116–31. doi: 10.1111/apt.2015.41.issue-11

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistic. CA Cancer J Clin. (2024) 74:12–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Farah E, Abreu AA, Rail B, Salgado J, Karagkounis G, Zeh HJ 3rd, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. World J Surg Oncol. (2023) 21:272. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03138-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Van Rooijen S, Carli F, Dalton S, Thomas G, Bojesen R, Le Guen M, et al. Multimodal prehabilitation in colorectal cancer patients to improve functional capacity and reduce postoperative complications: the first international randomized controlled trial for multimodal prehabilitation. BMC Cancer. (2019) 19:98. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5232-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Xie H, Wei L, Gao S, Liu M, Liang Y, Yuan G, et al. Prognostic significance of sarcopenia diagnosed based on the anthropometric equation for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Front Nutr. (2023) 10:1076589. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1076589

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zhou D, Zhang Y, Gao X, Yang J, Li G, Wang X. Long-term outcome in gastric cancer patients with different body composition score assessed via computed tomography. J Invest Surg. (2021) 34:875–82. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2019.1708997

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Burden ST, Hill J, Shaffer JL, Todd C. Nutritional status of preoperative colorectal cancer patients. J Hum Nutr Diet. (2010) 23:402–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01070.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Djordjevic A, Deftereos I, Carter VM, Morris S, Shannon R, Kiss N, et al. Ability of malnutrition screening and assessment tools to identify computed tomography defined low muscle mass in colorectal cancer surgery. Nutr Clin Pract. (2022) 37:666–76. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10844

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Zhang L, Wang S, Gao X, Gao T, Huang L, Lian B, et al. Poor pre-operative nutritional status is a risk factor of post-operative infections in patients with gastrointestinal cancer-A multicenter prospective cohort study. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:850063. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.850063

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Schattner M. Enteral nutritional support of the patient with cancer: route and role. J Clin Gastroenterol. (2003) 36:297–302. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200304000-00004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Martinez-Escribano C, Arteaga Moreno F, Perez-Lopez M, Cunha-Perez C, Belenguer-Varea A, Cuesta Peredo D, et al. Malnutrition and increased risk of adverse outcomes in elderly patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery: A case-control study nested in a cohort. Nutrients. (2022) 14(1):207. doi: 10.3390/nu14010207

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Magnan C, Lancry T, Salipante F, Trusson R, Dunyach-Remy C, Roger C, et al. Role of gut microbiota and bacterial translocation in acute intestinal injury and mortality in patients admitted in ICU for septic shock. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2023) 13:1330900. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1330900

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kotzampassi K, Stavrou G, Damoraki G, Georgitsi M, Basdanis G, Tsaousi G, et al. A four-probiotics regimen reduces postoperative complications after colorectal surgery: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. World J Surg. (2015) 39:2776–83. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3071-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Ermolenko E, Baryshnikova N, Alekhina G, Zakharenko A, Ten O, Kashchenko V, et al. Autoprobiotics in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer in the early postoperative period. Microorganisms. (2024) 12(5):980. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12050980

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Araujo MM, Montalvao-Sousa TM, Teixeira PDC, Figueiredo A, Botelho PB. The effect of probiotics on postsurgical complications in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. (2023) 81:493–510. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac069

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Brenchley JM, Douek DC. Microbial translocation across the GI tract. Annu Rev Immunol. (2012) 30:149–73. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Twardowska A, Makaro A, Binienda A, Fichna J, Salaga M. Preventing bacterial translocation in patients with leaky gut syndrome: nutrition and pharmacological treatment options. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23(6):3204. doi: 10.3390/ijms23063204

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Soriano-Lerma A, Garcia-Burgos M, Barton W, Mj MA, Crespo-Perez JV, Soriano M, et al. Comprehensive insight into the alterations in the gut microbiome and the intestinal barrier as a consequence of iron deficiency anaemia. BioMed J. (2024) 47(6):100701. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2024.100701

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Komatsu S, Yokoyama Y, Nagino M. Gut microbiota and bacterial translocation in digestive surgery: the impact of probiotics. Langenbecks Arch Surg. (2017) 402:401–16. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1577-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Allam-Ndoul B, Castonguay-Paradis S, Veilleux A. Gut microbiota and intestinal trans-epithelial permeability. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21(17):6402. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176402

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Turner JR. Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. (2009) 9:799–809. doi: 10.1038/nri2653

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Usuda H, Okamoto T, Wada K. Leaky gut: effect of dietary fiber and fats on microbiome and intestinal barrier. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22(14):7613. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147613

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. O'keeffe M, Kelly M, O'herlihy E, O'toole PW, Kearney PM, Timmons S, et al. Potentially modifiable determinants of malnutrition in older adults: A systematic review. Clin Nutr. (2019) 38:2477–98. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.12.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Jacobi SK, Moeser AJ, Blikslager AT, Rhoads JM, Corl BA, Harrell RJ, et al. Acute effects of rotavirus and malnutrition on intestinal barrier function in neonatal piglets. World J Gastroenterol. (2013) 19:5094–102. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i31.5094

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Andres SF, Zhang Y, Kuhn M, Scottoline B. Building better barriers: how nutrition and undernutrition impact pediatric intestinal health. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1192936. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1192936

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ribeiro SA, Braga EL, Queiroga ML, Clementino MA, Fonseca XM, Belem MO, et al. A new murine undernutrition model based on complementary feeding of undernourished children causes damage to the morphofunctional intestinal epithelium barrier. J Nutr. (2024) 154:1232–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.02.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Maghraby MK, Li B, Chi L, Ling C, Benmoussa A, Provost P, et al. Extracellular vesicles isolated from milk can improve gut barrier dysfunction induced by malnutrition. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:7635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86920-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Spalinger MR, Sayoc-Becerra A, Ordookhanian C, Canale V, Santos AN, King SJ, et al. The JAK inhibitor tofacitinib rescues intestinal barrier defects caused by disrupted epithelial-macrophage interactions. J Crohns Colitis. (2021) 15:471–84. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa182

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, intestinal barrier, malnutrition, colorectal cancer, surgery

Citation: Xu P, Shi S, Yu Z, Li D and Zhang C (2025) Case report: A case report and literature review on spontaneous bacterial peritonitis induced by intestinal barrier damage in a colorectal cancer patient with malnutrition. Front. Oncol. 15:1444149. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1444149

Received: 06 June 2024; Accepted: 28 January 2025;
Published: 17 February 2025.

Edited by:

Ann-Kathrin Lederer, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany

Reviewed by:

Marcos Edgar Herkenhoff, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Mohamed Tarek Badr, Freiburg University Medical Center, Germany

Copyright © 2025 Xu, Shi, Yu, Li and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Cheng Zhang, emhhbmdjMTEwOUAxNjMuY29t; Da Li, c2FuZGJveTIwMjRAMTYzLmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more