Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Radiation Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1397912

Case report: Pseudoprogression mimicking neoplastic recurrence three months after completion of proton beam therapy for an IDH-mutant astrocytoma CNS WHO grade 3

Provisionally accepted
Liv Cathrine Heggebø Liv Cathrine Heggebø 1,2*Ida Maria Henriksen Borgen Ida Maria Henriksen Borgen 3,4Hanne Blakstad Hanne Blakstad 2,3Cathrine Saxhaug Cathrine Saxhaug 5Pål Andre Rønning Pål Andre Rønning 6Pitt Frederik Niehusmann Pitt Frederik Niehusmann 7Katja Werlenius Katja Werlenius 8Malin Blomstrand Malin Blomstrand 8,9Petter Brandal Petter Brandal 10,3
  • 1 Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 2 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 3 Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Nordland, Norway
  • 4 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 5 Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 6 Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Nordland, Norway
  • 7 Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 8 Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • 9 Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
  • 10 Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Oslo, Norway

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Radiation-induced changes following proton beam therapy in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated diffuse central nervous system (CNS) World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2 and 3 gliomas are not well characterized. We present a patient with an IDH-mutant astrocytoma CNS WHO grade 3 treated with proton beam therapy and with postradiation MRI changes suggestive of neoplastic progression that surprisingly turned out to be reactive.Case presentation: A man in his twenties underwent surgery with a near gross total resection for what turned out to be an IDH-mutant astrocytoma CNS WHO grade 3. He was included in the PRO-GLIO trial and randomized to receive proton beam therapy to a total dose of 59.4 Gray (Gy) relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Four weeks after completion of radiotherapy, adjuvant temozolomide was commenced. All treatment was well tolerated, and the patient was in excellent general condition. Surprisingly, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination three months postradiation after completion of radiotherapy showed what was highly suggestive of a distant recurrence. The patient underwent resective surgery about seven months after his first surgery. Histological examination showed inflammatory changes without neoplastic tissue, albeit not very typical for postradiation changes. Adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide was continued.The presented case clearly shows that caution must be taken when interpreting cerebral MRI changes postradiation, and in particular after proton therapy. Further understanding of this subject is crucial to distinguish between patients requiring intensified antineoplastic treatment and those for whom maintaining current therapy or ongoing watchful waiting is advisable.

    Keywords: IDH-mutant astrocytoma, Diffuse glioma, pseudoprogression, proton beam therapy, Radiotherapy

    Received: 08 Mar 2024; Accepted: 06 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Heggebø, Borgen, Blakstad, Saxhaug, Rønning, Niehusmann, Werlenius, Blomstrand and Brandal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Liv Cathrine Heggebø, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.