The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Colorectal Cancer
Volume 14 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1506075
Pooled safety analysis of two phase 3 studies inves ga ng trifluridine/ piracil plus bevacizumab in pa ents with metasta c colorectal cancer
Provisionally accepted- 1 Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- 2 City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, United States
- 3 Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
- 4 Department of Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 5 University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- 6 University of Campania Liuigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
- 7 Servier International Research Institute, Suresnes, France
- 8 Taiho Oncology, Inc., Princeton, United States
- 9 Vall d’Hebron Hospital Campus, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
- 10 Sorbonne University and Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
Background: Trifluridine/ piracil (FTD/TPI) is approved as monotherapy and in combina on with bevacizumab for the treatment of pa ents with refractory metasta c colorectal cancer (mCRC). FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab showed good tolerability in the phase 3 SOLSTICE (first-line) and SUNLIGHT (later-line) trials. This pooled analysis was performed to further characterize the safety of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab and to compare safety in untreated and previously treated pa ents with mCRC.Methods: Pa ents must have received at least one dose of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab in SOLSTICE (NCT03869892) or SUNLIGHT (NCT04737187). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in SOLSTICE and SUNLIGHT were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events versions 4.03 and 5.0, respec vely. Times to onset/resolu on of grade ≥3 hematologic TEAEs were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were analyzed by age and Eastern Coopera ve Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS).The pooled safety popula on comprised 669 pa ents (SOLSTICE, n=423; SUNLIGHT, n=246). Grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported more frequently in SOLSTICE than in SUNLIGHT (86.8% vs. 72.4%), the most common being neutropenia and anemia. Overall, granulocyte colony-s mula ng factor was used in 30.6% of pa ents. Median me to resolu on of grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events/neutropenia to grade ≤2 was 8 days. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were more frequent in pa ents aged ≥75 years and those with an ECOG PS of 0 versus 1 or 2.Conclusions: FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab showed a consistent and manageable safety profile across firstand later-line mCRC treatment, including in vulnerable pa ents. Hematologic TEAEs were mostly reversible with appropriate management.
Keywords: clinical trial, first-line, SOLSTICE, SUNLIGHT, third-line ABBREVIATIONS AE, adverse event, ECOG PS, Eastern Coopera ve Oncology Group performance status, FTD/TPI, trifluridine/ piracil, G-CSF, granulocyte colony-s mula ng factor, mCRC, metasta c colorectal cancer, NCI-CTCAE, Na onal Cancer Ins tute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, SAE, serious adverse event, TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event
Received: 04 Oct 2024; Accepted: 11 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Taieb, Fakih, Liposits, Prager, Van Cutsem, Ciardiello, Amellal, Calleja, Liu, Roby, Tabernero and André. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Julien Taieb, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.