Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgical Oncology
Volume 14 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1481899
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancing Multidisciplinary Approaches in Skull-Base Tumor Management View all 3 articles

Adaptive Evaluation of Gross Total Resection Rates for Endoscopic Endonasal Approach Based on Preoperative MRI Morphological Features of Pituitary Adenomas

Provisionally accepted
Ao Shen Ao Shen Yue Min Yue Min Dongjie Zhou Dongjie Zhou Lirui Dai Lirui Dai Liang Lyu Liang Lyu Wenyi Zhan Wenyi Zhan Shu Jiang Shu Jiang Peizhi Zhou Peizhi Zhou *
  • Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: This study aims to define a set of related anatomical landmarks based on preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of patients with pituitary adenomas (PAs). It explores the impact of the dynamic relationships between different anatomical landmarks and the tumor on the resection rate and tumor progression/recurrence during the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA).Methods: A single-center institutional database review was conducted, identifying patients with PAs treated with EEA from December 2018 to January 2023. Clinical data were reviewed, and anatomical landmarks were categorized into two regions: the suprasellar region and the cavernous sinus region. Following basic statistical and univariate logistic regression analyses, patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets. A nomogram was then established through the integration of least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The clinical prediction model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for survival analysis.Results: A total of 626 patients with PAs were included in the study, with gross total resection (GTR) achieved in 570 cases (91.05%). Significant differences were observed in the distribution of age, Knosp grade, and tumor size between the GTR and near total resection (NTR) groups. LASSO regression identified 8 key anatomical landmarks. The resulting model demonstrated an AUC of 0.96 in both the training and validation sets. Calibration curves indicated a strong agreement between the nomogram model and actual observations. Survival analysis revealed that the extent of resection (EOR), age, Knosp grade, tumor size, and PAs extending beyond several anatomical landmarks identified were significantly associated with the progression or recurrence of PAs.This study proposes a model for adaptively assessing the resection rate of PAs by delineating relevant anatomical landmarks. The model comprehensively considers instrument manipulation angles, surgical accessibility during EEA procedures, anatomical variations, and the displacement of related anatomical structures in pathological states. This approach can assist neurosurgeons in preoperative planning and developing personalized surgical strategies.

    Keywords: pituitary adenomas, Anatomical landmarks, Adaptive evaluation, Prediction model, survival analysis

    Received: 16 Aug 2024; Accepted: 02 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Shen, Min, Zhou, Dai, Lyu, Zhan, Jiang and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Peizhi Zhou, Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.