The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Genitourinary Oncology
Volume 14 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1475044
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Prognostic Factors Linked to Extravesical Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy to Treat Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Provisionally accepted- 1 Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
- 2 Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan Province, China
- 3 Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
- 4 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Objective: Numerous studies have investigated predictors of intravesical recurrence following radical nephrectomy (RNU) in patients with upper urinary tract uroepithelial carcinoma (UTUC). In contrast, extravesical recurrence (EUR) has received less focus. Consequently, this study aims to evaluate the significant predictors of EUR after RNU through a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis.Methodology: We conducted a computerized bibliographic search across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify reports that include detailed results from multivariate analyses of predictors of EUR. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) criteria, we selected thirteen retrospective studies, each with a sample size exceeding 100 cases. Using Review Manager 5.4 software, we performed cumulative analyses of available HR and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals to evaluate potential predictors of EUR.Results: Our findings indicate that patient-specific predictors include preoperative Ki-67 with a HR of 3.61 (P = 0.003), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio with an HR of 2.20 (P = 0.0005), and glomerular filtration rate with an HR of 3.35 (P = 0.0009). Tumor-specific predictors identified were tumor stage with an HR of 4.67 (P < 0.00001), lymphovascular invasion with an HR of 2.37 (P = 0.004), and lymph node status with an HR of 2.68 (P < 0.0001). Regarding treatment-specific predictors, positive surgical margins were associated with an HR of 3.97 (P = 0.0005), and adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with an HR of 1.65 (P = 0.03).Discussion: Our study identified three significant predictors across patient, tumor, and treatment dimensions for extravesical recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract uroepithelial carcinoma. We hypothesize that history of bladder cancer, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and urinary cytology could also be strong predictors of post-RNU extravesical recurrence in patients with upper UTUC, assuming adequate sample size and controlled heterogeneity. This research aims to provide urological clinicians with enhanced guidance for 2 postoperative decision-making.
Keywords: : Urinary tract, urothelial carcinoma, Ureter, Extravesical recurrence, predictor, Meta-analysis
Received: 02 Aug 2024; Accepted: 29 Oct 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Zhang, Jiang, Chen, Zhao, Wang, Liu and Ding. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Zhaoqiang Jiang, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Ying Zhao, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, Beijing Municipality, China
Jianan Wang, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Jinxing Liu, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Zhenshan Ding, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, Beijing Municipality, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.