Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Gastric and Esophageal Cancers
Volume 14 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1466473

Optimal Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Regimen for Advanced and Peritoneal Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Provisionally accepted
Tianqi Wang Tianqi Wang 1,2Shengjie Ma Shengjie Ma 2Shiwei Zhang Shiwei Zhang 2Yilihaer Aizezi Yilihaer Aizezi 2Quan Wang Quan Wang 2*
  • 1 Jilin University, Changchun, China
  • 2 Department of Gastric, Colorectal and Anal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Peritoneal metastasis is one of the most common modes of spread of gastric cancer. Currently, surgical treatment combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and systemic chemotherapy has demonstrated promising outcomes in both the treatment and prevention of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. However, various HIPEC drug regimens are in clinical use, and their efficacy remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different HIPEC drug regimens in patients with advanced gastric cancer to determine the optimal therapeutic approach. Methods: This study conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Patients in the experimental group underwent surgery combined with HIPEC and chemotherapy. The search period covered literature from database inception to June 1, 2024. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were used to assess overall disease recurrence, peritoneal recurrence, and postoperative morbidity as secondary outcomes. To ensure scientific rigor and transparency, this study has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024533948). Results: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1092 patients were included. Compared to surgery combined with chemotherapy, the regimens of cisplatin (HRs = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.38-0.73), mitomycin C (HRs = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.55-1.79), cisplatin plus fluorouracil (HRs = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38-0.95), and oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (HRs = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.36-0.78) all demonstrated benefits in OS. The cisplatin (ORs = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.60) and mitomycin C (ORs = 0.03, 95% CI: 0-0.71) regimens also showed advantages in reducing peritoneal recurrence, with no impact on postoperative morbidity. Importantly, the cisplatin regimen was superior to other regimens in terms of OS and overall disease recurrence, achieving a balance between efficacy and safety. Conclusions: Compared to chemotherapy alone, HIPEC treatment shows significant benefits in OS without a notable disadvantage in postoperative morbidity. Although no single HIPEC regimen demonstrated clear benefits across all outcomes, the cisplatin regimen performed well in multiple aspects, indicating its potential for further research and clinical application.

    Keywords: gastric cancer, HIPEC, chemotherapy, Systematic review, Bayesian network meta-analysis

    Received: 18 Jul 2024; Accepted: 28 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Wang, Ma, Zhang, Aizezi and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Quan Wang, Department of Gastric, Colorectal and Anal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.