Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Cancer Genetics
Volume 14 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1463341

Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling in Detecting Targetable Fusions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Provisionally accepted
Young-gon Kim Young-gon Kim Boram Lee Boram Lee Changhee Ha Changhee Ha Cheonghwa Lee Cheonghwa Lee *Hyun Ae Jung Hyun Ae Jung *Jong-Mu Sun Jong-Mu Sun *Se-Hoon Lee Se-Hoon Lee Myung-Ju Ahn Myung-Ju Ahn Yoon-La Choi Yoon-La Choi *Sehhoon Park Sehhoon Park *Jong-Won Kim Jong-Won Kim *
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Numerous studies have suggested high concordance between tissue and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests but only few of them focused on fusions. In addition, atypical breakpoints occasionally detected from DNA-based fusion detection make interpretation difficult, and their clinical significance remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinical utility of ctDNA CGP for fusion detection. Methods: The results of ctDNA CGP tests performed on patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer during routine clinical care were retrospectively reviewed. The concordance between ctDNA CGP and combined tissue test results was analyzed using CGP, immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The clinical significance of fusions detected by ctDNA CGP, including those with atypical breakpoints at the DNA level, was assessed.Results: In total, 264 patients were tested with ctDNA CGP. Fusions were detected in 27 patients (10.2%), and the fusion drivers were RET (Nn=12, 4.6%), ALK (Nn=9, 3.4%), ROS1 (Nn=4, 1.5%), and FGFR2 (Nn=2, 0.8%). The overall prevalence of fusion in tissue CGP was comparable to that in ctDNA CGP. A total of 371 ctDNA-tissue test pairs were available, and the overall positive and negative percent agreement rates were 92.9% (13/14) and 100.0% (357/357), respectively. One ALK IHC-positive and ctDNA CGP-negative case did not respond to ALK-targeted therapy, suggesting false positivity. Response to targeted therapy was assessed in 14 16 patients, and a partial response was achieved in all patients, including four with atypical breakpoints.Fusion detection using ctDNA CGP showed high concordance with tissue tests and accuracy in predicting therapeutic responses in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. ctDNA CGP may provide an important diagnostic tool for fusion detection.

    Keywords: Circulating-tumor DNA, CtDNA, Gene Fusion, Non-small cell lung cancer, Comprehensive genomic profiling

    Received: 11 Jul 2024; Accepted: 09 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Kim, Lee, Ha, Lee, Jung, Sun, Lee, Ahn, Choi, Park and Kim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Cheonghwa Lee, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Hyun Ae Jung, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Jong-Mu Sun, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Yoon-La Choi, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Sehhoon Park, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Jong-Won Kim, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.