Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgical Oncology
Volume 14 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1457017
This article is part of the Research Topic Integrating Health-Related Quality of Life in Neuro-Oncology View all 9 articles

Influence of Neuropathological Diagnosis on Psychooncological Distress in Neurooncological Patients -A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis

Provisionally accepted
Franziska Staub-Bartelt Franziska Staub-Bartelt 1*Sarah Obermayr Sarah Obermayr 2Michael Sabel Michael Sabel 1Marion Rapp Marion Rapp 1
  • 1 University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • 2 Bezirkskrankenhaus Kufstein, Kufstein, Tyrol, Austria

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Gliomas, the most common primary brain tumours, are classified based on histology and molecular genetics. Glioblastomas (GBM) are highly aggressive and are graded as WHO grade 4, while astrocytoma and oligodendrogliomas fall under WHO grades 2-3 (4). GBM has the poorest prognosis, whereas grade 2 astrocytoma and oligodendrogliomas show better outcomes. Quality of life (QoL) is now a crucial therapeutic goal alongside survival. Despite the impact of gliomas on QoL, especially given their incurability and progressive neurological deficits, research specifically comparing QoL and psycho-oncological stress in GBM versus grade 2 gliomas (glioma_2) remains limited. This study aims to fill that gap using validated measurement methods. This retrospective, single-centre study investigated differences in QoL among neuro-oncological patients using the Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), Distress Thermometer (DT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and EORTC-QLQ-C30-BN20. Out of 2258 patients screened until June 30, 2022, 639 had glioblastoma or WHO grade 2 gliomas, with 223 meeting inclusion criteria for analysis. The study included 161 GBM and 62 Glioma_2 patients, with 64% of all patients being male. The mean age was 58.11 years (SD ± 16.186). The DT did not show significant differences between GBM and glioma_2 glioma patients (median GBM:6 vs. 5 in glioma_2, p=0.480). However, the HADS-D indicates that GBM patients experience significantly more depression (median GBM 4.5 vs. 4 in glioma_2, p=0.033), though anxiety levels are similar in both groups (median GBM. 6 vs. 6 in glioma_2, p=0.867). The KPS (median GBM 70 vs. 90 in glioma_2, p<0.001) and specific aspects of the EORTC-QLQ-C30-BN20 questionnaire demonstrate that GBM patients have notably greater physical impairments than glioma_2 patients at diagnosis. Overall, GBM patients report a worse quality of life compared to glioma_2 patients (median GBM 50 vs. 67 in glioma_2, p<0.001). This study showed that distress is present in glioma patients regardless of their histopathological grading, even though GBM patients show higher depression levels and more physical limitations. Targeted anxiety management and early depression screening are essential for all glioma patients. Early QoL screening and making QoL a therapeutic goal benefits patient care and society.

    Keywords: Quality of Life, Glioma, Neurooncology, Mental Health, distress

    Received: 29 Jun 2024; Accepted: 21 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Staub-Bartelt, Obermayr, Sabel and Rapp. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Franziska Staub-Bartelt, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.