Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Colorectal Cancer
Volume 14 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1450732

TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) plus Bevacizumab versus TAS-102 alone as Salvage Treatment Options for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Routine Clinical Practice

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea
  • 2 Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Both regimens of TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) with and without bevacizumab are considered standard options for salvage treatment in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). This analysis included patients with metastatic CRC who received either TAS-102 plus bevacizumab or TAS-102 alone between July 2022 and November 2023 at Samsung Medical Center. We evaluated the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profile of both regimens. Results: 139 patients were included in this analysis. Median age was 60.8 years, and median number of previous lines of therapy was four (range: 2.45-6.55). 56.8% had RAS mutations and 92.9% had received previous anti-VEGF therapy. 83 (59.7%) patients received the combination of TAS-102 and bevacizumab and 56 (40.3%) received TAS-102 alone. The number of patients with prior regorafenib treatment was 14 in the TAS-102 with bevacizumab group and five in the TAS-102 alone group. The disease control rate was 51.8% in the combination group and 32.1% in the TAS-102 alone group. The median PFS was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.7-6.6) in the combination group and 2.5 months (95% CI, 2.0-3.8) in the TAS-102 alone group (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.82; p=0.003). The median OS in these two groups was 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.4-NA) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.8-9.8), respectively (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.97, p=0.033). In the exploratory analysis of TAS-102 + Bev, patients with the KRAS G12 mutation had inferior OS compared to those without the mutation. Commonly observed adverse events were neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, as well as nausea. While any grade neutropenia was observed at similar frequencies in the two groups (57.8% and 57.1%), grade 3 or higher neutropenia was more frequent in the combination group than the TAS-102 alone group (31.3% vs. 17.9%). Among patients who received subsequent anticancer therapy after treatment failure, 74.1% received regorafenib.The combination of TAS-102 and bevacizumab resulted in a better survival outcome than TAS-102 monotherapy, consistent with previous studies. This analysis supports the use of the combination of TAS-102 and bevacizumab as the best therapeutic option for patients with refractory metastatic CRC in clinical practice.

    Keywords: Metastatic colorectal cancer1, Salvage treatment2, TAS-1023, Bevacizumab4, TAS-102 plus Bevacizumab5

    Received: 18 Jun 2024; Accepted: 29 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Shin, Lim, Lee, M.D., Lim, Park and Kim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Seung Tae Kim, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.