Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Skin Cancer
Volume 14 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1444590

Survival Outcomes in Patients with De Novo Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma According to Site of Metastases

Provisionally accepted
Karam Khaddour Karam Khaddour 1,2Mofei Liu Mofei Liu 1*Emily Y. Kim Emily Y. Kim 1*Furkan Bahar Furkan Bahar 1*Matheus M. Lôbo Matheus M. Lôbo 1*Anita Giobbie-Hurder Anita Giobbie-Hurder 1*Ann W. Silk Ann W. Silk 1,2Manisha Thakuria Manisha Thakuria 1,2,3*
  • 1 Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
  • 2 Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • 3 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine malignancy of the skin with a predilection for metastases. This study investigates the clinical outcomes in patients presenting with de novo Stage IV MCC according to the metastatic site(s) at presentation.Patients who presented with one or more sites of distant metastatic MCC at initial diagnosis between 2009 and 2023 were identified. The presence or absence of one or more metastases in each organ was categorized for each patient at the time of diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate the cumulative occurrence risk of MCC-specific death. Fisher's exact test was used for response rate analysis. Results were considered statically significant if p < 0.05.There was no association between the number of metastatic sites at diagnosis and OS (p= 0.58), PFS (p=0.79), or response rates (p=0.53). However, the presence of bone metastases was associated with significantly shorter OS (8.2 versus 25.2 months, HR: 2.4, 95% CI 1.01-5.7, p= 0.04). MCC-specific death in patients with lymph node metastases was significantly lower than in patients without (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.09-0.87, p= 0.013). The presence of bone metastases tended to associate with an increased risk of MCC-specific death, although not statistically significant.The location of metastases was not associated with the response rate to first-line treatment. There was no significant association between site of metastases and PFS.In this cohort of patients with de novo metastatic MCC, the presence of bone metastases, but not the number of organs involved, was associated with significantly worse OS. The presence of lymph node metastases was associated with lower MCC-specific death. Further research is warranted in larger cohorts to investigate the impact of the location of metastases on clinical outcomes.

    Keywords: Merkel cell cancer, metastases, DeNovo, Survival, Outcome, organ sites of metastasis, Non melanoma skin cancer

    Received: 05 Jun 2024; Accepted: 27 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Khaddour, Liu, Kim, Bahar, Lôbo, Giobbie-Hurder, Silk and Thakuria. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Mofei Liu, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Emily Y. Kim, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Furkan Bahar, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Matheus M. Lôbo, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Anita Giobbie-Hurder, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Manisha Thakuria, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.