Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Gastric and Esophageal Cancers
Volume 14 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1433874

Construction and Validation of Prognostic Signatures Related to Mitochondria and Macrophage Polarization in Gastric Cancer

Provisionally accepted
Yan Zhang Yan Zhang 1*Jian Cao Jian Cao 1Zhen Yuan Zhen Yuan 1Hao Zuo Hao Zuo 1Jiacong Yao Jiacong Yao 2Xiaodie Tu Xiaodie Tu 2Xinhua Gu Xinhua Gu 1
  • 1 Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, China
  • 2 Other, Hangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Increasing evidence reveals the involvement of mitochondria and macrophage polarisation in tumourigenesis and progression. This study aimed to establish mitochondria and macrophage polarisation-associated molecular signatures to predict prognosis in gastric cancer (GC) by single-cell and transcriptional data. Methods: Initially, candidate genes associated with mitochondria and macrophage polarisation were identified by differential expression analysis and weighted gene coexpression network analysis. Subsequently, candidate genes were incorporated in univariate Cox analysis and LASSO to acquire prognostic genes in GC, and risk model was created. Furthermore, independent prognostic indicators were screened by combining risk score with clinical characteristics, and a nomogram was created to forecast survival in GC patients. Further, in single-cell data analysis, cell clusters and cell subpopulations were yielded, followed by the completion of pseudo-time analysis. Furthermore, a more comprehensive immunological analysis was executed to uncover the relationship between GC and immunological characteristics. Ultimately, expression level of prognostic genes was validated through public datasets and qRT-PCR.Results: A risk model including six prognostic genes (GPX3, GJA1, VCAN, RGS2, LOX, and CTHRC1) associated with mitochondria and macrophage polarisation was developed, which was efficient in forecasting the survival of GC patients. The GC patients were categorized into high-/low-risk subgroups in accordance with median risk score, with the high-risk subgroup having lower survival rates. Afterwards, a nomogram incorporating risk score and age was generated, and it had significant predictive value for predicting GC survival with higher predictive accuracy than risk model. Immunological analyses revealed showed higher levels of M2 macrophage infiltration in high-risk subgroup and the strongest positive correlation between risk score and M2 macrophages. Besides, further analyses demonstrated a better outcome for immunotherapy in low-risk patients. In single-cell and pseudo-time analyses, stromal cells were identified as key cells, and a relatively complete developmental trajectory existed for stromal C1 in three subclasses. Ultimately, expression analysis revealed that the expression trend of RGS2, GJA1, GPX3, and VCAN was consistent with the results of the TCGA-GC dataset.Our findings demonstrated that a novel prognostic model constructed in accordance with six prognostic genes might facilitate the improvement of personalised prognosis and treatment of GC patients.

    Keywords: gastric cancer, Mitochondria, macrophage polarisation, single-cell data, Prognostic signature

    Received: 16 May 2024; Accepted: 04 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zhang, Cao, Yuan, Zuo, Yao, Tu and Gu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Yan Zhang, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.