Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs
Volume 14 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1433497

Association of COX-inhibitors with cancer patients' survival under chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens: a real-world data retrospective cohort analysis

Provisionally accepted
Lucas E. Flausino Lucas E. Flausino 1,2Isabella N. Ferreira Isabella N. Ferreira 1,2Wen-Jan Tuan Wen-Jan Tuan 3Maria D. Diz Maria D. Diz 2,4Roger Chammas Roger Chammas 1,2*
  • 1 Centro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • 2 Comprehensive Center for Precision Oncology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • 3 College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
  • 4 Institute of Cancer of São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Purpose We conducted an extensive, sex-oriented real-world data analysis to explore the impact and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) on cancer treatment outcomes. This is particularly relevant given the role of the COX-2/PGE2 pathway in tumor cell resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Patients and Methods The study applied a retrospective cohort design utilizing the TriNetX research database consisting of patients receiving cancer treatment in 2008-2022. The treated cohorts included patients who were prescribed with coxibs, aspirin or ibuprofen, while individuals in the control cohort did not receive these medicines during their cancer treatment. A 1:1 propensity score matching technique was used to balance the baseline characteristics in the treated and control cohorts. Then, Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression were applied to assess the mortality and morbidity risks among patient cohorts in a 5-year follow-up period. Results Use of coxibs (HR, 0.825; 95% CI 0.792-0.859 in females and HR, 0.884; 95% CI 0.848-0.921 in males) and ibuprofen (HR, 0.924; 95% CI 0.903-0.945 in females and HR, 0.940; 95% CI 0.917-0.963 in males) were associated with improved survival. Female cancer patients receiving aspirin presented increased mortality (HR, 1.078; 95% CI 1.060-1.097), while male cancer patients also had improved survival when receiving aspirin (HR, 0.966; 95% CI 0.951-0.980). Cancer subtype specific analysis suggests coxibs and ibuprofen correlated with survival, though ibuprofen and aspirin increased emergency department visits' risk. Secondary analyses, despite limited by small cohort sizes, suggest that COX inhibition post-cancer diagnosis may benefit patients with specific cancer subtypes. Conclusions Selective COX-2 inhibition significantly reduced mortality and emergency department visit rates. Further clinical trials are needed to determine the optimal conditions for indication of coxibs as anti-inflammatory adjuvants in cancer treatment.

    Keywords: COX-inhibitors, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cancer survival, chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, Multiarm, Multistage, PLATFORM

    Received: 15 May 2024; Accepted: 27 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Flausino, Ferreira, Tuan, Diz and Chammas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Roger Chammas, Comprehensive Center for Precision Oncology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.