Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Colorectal Cancer
Volume 14 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1373088

Performance of DNA methylation and blood-borne tumor indicators in detecting colorectal neoplasia and adenomas: a comparative study with the fecal occult blood test

Provisionally accepted
Ming Chen Ming Chen Ji Zhang Ji Zhang Bin Xu Bin Xu Bilian Yao Bilian Yao Zhenzhen Wang Zhenzhen Wang Ying Chen Ying Chen Kaiyu Cai Kaiyu Cai Chenli Zhang Chenli Zhang *
  • Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objectives: To evaluate the performance of stool methylated syndecan2 (mSDC2), methylated septin9 (mSEPT9), fecal occult blood test (FOBT), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) in detecting colorectal neoplasia and adenomas. Methods: Blood-borne CEA, CA125, and CA199 levels were measured by electrochemiluminescence. The SDC2 methylation was detected by Methylation Detection Kit for Human SDC2 Gene (Real time PCR), and the SEPT9 methylation was detected by the Septin9 Gene Methylation Detection Kit based on PCR fluorescent probe assay. The colonoscopy combined with tissue biopsy pathology was used as a validation criterion for colorectal neoplasia. Results: In detecting colorectal neoplasia, the AUCs of mSDC2, FOBT and mSEPT9 were 0.935 (95% CI: 0.915-0.956, P<0.001), 0.824 (95% CI: 0.617-1.000, P<0.001) and 0.671 (95% CI: 0.511-0.831, P<0.001), respectively. The sensitivity of mSDC2, FOBT and mSEPT9 were 100.0%, 66.7% and 40.0%, respectively. But the AUC of CEA, CA125 and CA199 were not statistically significant for colorectal neoplasia (all P>0.05). The combined application of mSEPT9 and mSDC2 showed the best predictive performance (AUC: 0.956, 95% CI: 0.887~1.000). For adenomas, the AUC of FOBT was extremely low (AUC: 0.524, 95% CI: 0.502-0.545, P=0.004). The CEA, CA125, CA199, mSEPT9 and mSDC2 were not statistically significant in detecting adenomas (all P>0.05). Conclusions: For individual tests, FOBT and mSDC2 are relatively better indicators for detecting colorectal neoplasia compared to mSEPT9, CEA, CA125 and CA199. The combined form of mSEPT9 and mSDC2 to detect colorectal neoplasia has good predictive performance. However, none of these indicators demonstrated significant predictive power for detecting adenomas in our study.

    Keywords: FOBT, Colorectal neoplasia, MSEPT9, mSDC2, Adenoma

    Received: 19 Jan 2024; Accepted: 11 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Chen, Zhang, Xu, Yao, Wang, Chen, Cai and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Chenli Zhang, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200025, Beijing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.