Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Radiation Oncology
Volume 14 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1371409
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in GI and hepatic cancer mechanisms and therapeutic approaches View all 3 articles

Prognostic nomogram of overall survival for radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma:a population study based on SEER database and an external corhort

Provisionally accepted
Lijun Chen Lijun Chen 1Qiaoyuan Wu Qiaoyuan Wu 1*Jia Fu Jia Fu 1*Mengjie Jiang Mengjie Jiang 1Jialin Qiu Jialin Qiu 1*Jiaomei Tao Jiaomei Tao 1*Litong Lin Litong Lin 1*Shenshen Chen Shenshen Chen 1*Yi Wu Yi Wu 1*Zhengqiang Yang Zhengqiang Yang 2*Jianxu Li Jianxu Li 1*Shixiong Liang Shixiong Liang 1*
  • 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
  • 2 Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Radiotherapy (RT) plays an important role in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).To screen patients who benefit most from RT,a nomogram for survival prediction of RT based on a large sample of HCC patients was created and validated. Methods 2,252 cases collected from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were seperated into a training or an internal validation cohort in a 7 to 3 ratio (n=1,565:650). An external validation cohort of cases from our institude was obtained (n=403). LASSO regression and COX analyses were adopted to develop a nomogram for survival prediction.The decision curve analysis (DCA) ,calibration curve and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (TROC) demonstrated the reliability of the predictive model.For HCC patients received RT,the analyses revealed independent survival prediction factors were T stage(T2 vs T1,hazard ratio(HR)=1.452, [95%CI,1.195-1.765],p<0.001;T3 vs T1,HR=1.469, [95%CI,1.168-1.846],p<0.001;T4 vs T1,HR=1.291, [95%CI,0.951-1.754],p=0.101),N stage(HR=1.555, [95%CI,1.338-1.805],p<0.001),M stage(HR=3.007, [95%CI,2.645-3.418],p<0.001),max tumor size(>2 and ≤5 vs ≤2 cm,HR=1.273, [95%CI,0.992-1.633],p=0.057;>5 and ≤10 vs ≤2 cm,HR=1.625, [95%CI,1.246-2.118],p<0.001;>10 vs ≤2 cm,HR=1.784 , [95%CI,1.335-2.385],p<0.001),MVI(HR=1.454, [95%CI,1.028-2.057],p=0.034),AFP(HR=1.573, [95%CI,1.315-1.882],p<0.001) and chemotherapy(HR=0.511, [95%CI,0.454-0.576],p<0.001).A nomogram constructed with these prognostic factors demonstrated outstanding predictive accuracy.The area under the curve(AUC) in the training cohort for predicting OS at 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month were 0.824 (95% CI 0.803-0.846), 0.824 (95% CI 0.802-0.845), 0.816 (95% CI 0.792-0.840) and 0.820 (95%CI 0.794-0.846) .The AUCs were similar in the other two cohorts.The DCA and calibration curve demonstrated the reliability of the predictive model. For patients who have been treated with RT,a nomogram constructed with T stage,N stage, M stage, tumor size,MVI,AFP and chemotherapy has good survival prediction ability.

    Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), nomogram, LASSO regression, Radiation therapy (RT), SEER database, Overall survival (OS)

    Received: 16 Jan 2024; Accepted: 12 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Chen, Wu, Fu, Jiang, Qiu, Tao, Lin, Chen, Wu, Yang, Li and Liang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Qiaoyuan Wu, Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
    Jia Fu, Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
    Jialin Qiu, Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
    Jiaomei Tao, Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
    Litong Lin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
    Shenshen Chen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
    Yi Wu, Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
    Zhengqiang Yang, Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
    Jianxu Li, Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
    Shixiong Liang, Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.