The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention
Volume 14 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1369765
Predicting risk factors for Epstein-Barr virus reactivation using Bayesian network analysis: A population-based study of high-risk areas for nasopharyngeal cancer
Provisionally accepted- 1 School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China
- 2 School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- 3 Department of Cancer Prevention, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China, Guangzhou, China
- 4 State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC), Guanghzou, Guangdong, China
- 5 Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- 6 Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
Background and Objective: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a rare disease in most parts of the world, but it is highly prevalent in South China. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is one of the major risk factors for NPC. Hence, understanding the factors associated with the reactivation of EBV from the latent stage is crucial for preventing NPC. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for EBV reactivation associated with NPC in high-prevalence areas in China using a Bayesian network (BN) model combined with structural equation modeling tools.The baseline information for this study was derived from NPC screening data from a population-based prospective cohort in Sihui City, Guangdong Province, China. We divided the data into a training dataset and a test dataset. We then constructed an interaction network-based BN prediction model to explore the risk factors for EBV reactivation, which was compared with a conventional logistic regression model.Results: A total of 12,579 participants were included in the analyses, with 1596 participant pairs finally included after the use of a nested case-control study. The results of multivariable logistic regression showed that only being older than 60 years (OR = 1.718, 95% CI = 1.273-2.322) and being a current smoker (OR = 1.477, 95% CI = 1.167-1.872) were the risk factors for EBV reactivation. The results of the model constructed using BN showed that age and smoking were directly associated with EBV reactivation. In contrast, sex, education level, tea drinking, cooking, and family history of cancer were indirectly associated with EBV reactivation. Further, we predicted the risk of EBV reactivation using Bayesian inference and visualized the BN inference. Model prediction performance was evaluated using the test dataset. The results showed that the BN model slightly outperformed the traditional logistic regression model in all metrics.Conclusions: BN not only reflects the complex interaction between factors but also visualizes the prediction results. It has a promising application potential in the risk prediction of EBV reactivation associated with NPC.
Keywords: Bayesian network, EBV reactivation, Model construction, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Logistic regression
Received: 24 Jan 2024; Accepted: 20 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Zeng, Lin, Li, Li, Li, Li, Ning, Liu, Xie, Cao and Du. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Kena Lin, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China
Xueqi Li, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
Xiaoman Li, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China
Zule Ning, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China
Qinxian Liu, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China
Shanghang Xie, Department of Cancer Prevention, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China, Guangzhou, China
Sumei Cao, Department of Cancer Prevention, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China, Guangzhou, China
Jinlin Du, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.