Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Oncol., 15 February 2024
Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in Drug-induced Diseases Volume II View all 21 articles

Case report: A rare case of triple negative breast cancer with development of acute pancreatitis due to dexamethasone during adjuvant chemotherapy

Hirofumi OhmuraHirofumi Ohmura1Taro ToboTaro Tobo2Yuki AndoYuki Ando3Takaaki MasudaTakaaki Masuda3Koshi MimoriKoshi Mimori3Koichi AkashiKoichi Akashi4Eishi Baba*Eishi Baba1*
  • 1Department of Oncology and Social Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
  • 2Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital, Beppu, Japan
  • 3Department of Surgery, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital, Oita, Japan
  • 4Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan

Here, we present the case of a 42-year-old female who developed acute pancreatitis due to dexamethasone during adjuvant chemotherapy for early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The patient received partial mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy for early TNBC (cT1N0M0, cStage I) of the left breast. Dose-dense doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (ddAC) was administered as the adjuvant-chemotherapy; however, epigastralgia appeared on the fifth day of the first administration. A blood test showed a remarkable increase of serum pancreatic enzyme levels and computed tomography (CT) showed the swelling of pancreas and surrounding effusion, and she was diagnosed with moderate acute pancreatitis. As she had no history of excessive alcohol consumption or complication of cholelithiasis, dyslipidemia, or pancreatic neoplasm, drug-induced pancreatitis was suspected. Dexamethasone, which was administered as an antiemetic, was the suspected drug based on the drug administration history and previous report, and dexamethasone was discontinued from the second administration of ddAC. There was subsequently no recurrence of pancreatitis with no increase in serum pancreatic enzyme levels, and it was possible to complete adjuvant-chemotherapy. Alcohol, gallstones, dyslipidemia, and drugs have been reported as causes of pancreatitis; however, steroid-induced acute pancreatitis is extremely rare. We present the first case of acute pancreatitis induced by dexamethasone as the antiemetic.

1 Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and a leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide (1). Early-stage breast cancer is treated with surgery, while multimodal therapy including radiation, perioperative chemotherapy is added according to the risk factors for recurrence. In operable breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy have shown no significant difference in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (2). Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved long-term outcomes (35). Standard perioperative chemotherapy options for HER2-negative breast cancer include anthracyclines and taxanes. A typical regimen is 4 cycles of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel (PTX). Compared to standard 3-week cycles, dose-dense chemotherapy with the support of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and 2-week cycles significantly improved DFS and OS (6).

Acute pancreatitis is diagnosed based on at least two of the following revised Atlanta criteria: (1) abdominal pain suggestive of pancreatitis, (2) serum amylase or lipase >3 times the upper limit of normal, and (3) imaging findings of acute pancreatitis on CT or MRI (7, 8). Common causes are gallstones and alcohol, while genetic and drug-induced are less common. The pathogenesis involves damage to pancreatic acinar cells, inappropriate intra-acinar trypsinogen activation, and autodigestion of the pancreatic parenchyma. Activated pancreatic enzymes injure the pancreatic tissue, inducing inflammatory cytokines through NFκB signaling, resulting in inflammation and edema of the pancreas. In gallstone pancreatitis, increased pancreatic duct pressure from obstructed outflow is thought to be the main cause, while the pathogenesis of alcohol-induced pancreatitis has not been well elucidated (9). Genetic mutations have been identified as the cause of pancreatitis, including PRSS1 mutations in cationic trypsinogen, and SPINK1 mutations associated with inactivation of trypsin (10). Drug-induced pancreatitis is rare; however, more than 100 medications have been reported to be associated with pancreatitis. Direct toxicity for pancreas, accumulation of metabolites, ischemia of pancreatic tissue, and increased viscosity of pancreatic secretions have been suggested as the mechanisms for the onset of drug-induced pancreatitis; however, the mechanisms underlying drug-induced pancreatitis have not been well elucidated for most causative drugs (11, 12).

2 Case description

A 42-year-old woman presented to a local clinic in March 2019 with a complaint of left breast mass with the longest diameter of 15mm in the C region by ultrasound examination. The patient had undergone breast cancer screening in the previous year, and mammography revealed no abnormal findings. Core needle biopsy from the left breast mass showed invasive ductal carcinoma, solid tubular type, tumor size; invasive area 18×16mm, nuclear grade (NG) 3, hormone receptor (estrogen receptor, ER; and progesterone receptor, PgR) negative, and HER2 negative. The patient was referred to our surgical department in April for further treatment of TNBC cT1N0M0, cStage I. The patient had no family history of pancreatic cancer or pancreatitis, or history of excessive alcohol consumption, cholelithiasis, diabetes, dyslipidemia or hypertension. And she had no medication or food allergy. In May, partial mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy were performed. Postoperative pathological diagnosis revealed TNBC, T1cN0, ly0, v0, NG3, ER (Allred score 0), PgR (Allred score 0), HER2 (IHC score 0), and MIB1 (78%) (Figures 1A–E). Postoperative dose-dense doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (ddAC; doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 day1, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 day1, 2-week cycle)×4 cycles followed by dose-dense paclitaxel (ddPTX; paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 day1, 2-week cycle)×4 cycles, then radiation to the residual breast, was planned for the adjuvant therapy. Administration of ddAC was initiated in August. As antiemetics, dexamethasone (9.9mg/body day1, intravenous; 8mg/body day2-4, oral), aprepitant (125mg/body day1; 80mg/body day2-3, oral), and granisetron (3mg/body, day1, intravenous) were administered. On day 5 of the first cycle of ddAC, the patient developed epigastric pain, with marked elevation of pancreatic enzymes (amylase 1344 U/L (pancreatic amylase, 97.4%; salivary amylase, 2.6%), lipase 1895 U/L). Contrast-enhanced CT showed pancreatic enlargement and peri-pancreatic fluid, meeting criteria for mild acute pancreatitis by the revised Atlanta classification (Figure 2). With fasting and intravenous fluid administration, pancreatic enzymes rapidly decreased, and the abdominal pain resolved (Figure 3). Re-examination of CT after 3 days showed the resolution of the peri-pancreatic fluid, indicating improvement of the pancreatitis. The patient had no history of heavy alcohol intake, gallstones, dyslipidemia, or pancreatic tumor, implicating drug-induced pancreatitis. Among the medications, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and antiemetics including dexamethasone, aprepitant, and granisetron were considered to be candidates for suspected drugs. There has been a previous report of acute pancreatitis due to dexamethasone, and with the Naranjo adverse drug reactions (ADR) probability scale (≥ 9 points, Definite; 5-8 points, Probable; 1-4 points, Possible; 0-3 points, Doubtful) (13), dexamethasone scored 6 indicating ‘Probable’, while other drugs scored 3 indicating ‘Possible’, and dexamethasone was considered as the suspected drug. Dexamethasone was omitted from cycle 2. The doses of other drugs remained unchanged. No further elevation of serum pancreatic enzymes or recurrence of pancreatitis was observed, allowing completion of 4 cycles of ddAC and 4 cycles of ddPTX. Steroid-induced acute pancreatitis is extremely rare, however, it should be recognized as a potential adverse event of chemotherapy.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Histopathological examination (scale bar 50 μm) of the surgical specimen from the lesion of left breast showed invasive ductal carcinoma grade 3 (A). Immunohistochemically, tumor cells were negative for estrogen receptor (B), progesterone receptor (C) and HER2 (D) and Ki67 score was 78% (E).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Contrast-enhanced CT showed pancreatic enlargement and peri-pancreatic fluid (indicated by yellow arrows), meeting criteria for mild acute pancreatitis according to the revised Atlanta classification (scale bar 5 cm).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Clinical time course and the serum level of pancreatic enzymes of the patient are shown. The vertical axis of the graph shows the serum levels of pancreatic enzymes [U/mL], and the horizontal axis shows the days from initiation of dose-dense doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (ddAC). Dexamethasone (DEX) was administered on day1-4.

3 Discussion

There is one previous case report of acute pancreatitis after administration of dexamethasone for spinal cord compression, with recurrence on re-challenge; however, the patient also had risk factors including alcohol intake (14). Khanna et al. reported a case of acute pancreatitis induced by re-administration of hydrocortisone for ulcerative colitis. Other steroids including prednisolone and cortisone acetate also may potentially cause acute pancreatitis (15). Glucocorticoids including dexamethasone have been reported to inhibit NFκB activation and suppress TNFα production of immune cells (16). As NFκB activation and inflammatory cytokine production are involved in the pathogenesis of pancreatitis (9), the mechanism of steroid-induced pancreatitis likely involves pathways other than NFκB activation. Previous reports have also suggested that steroids increase pancreatic juice viscosity and proliferate pancreatic ductal epithelium, delaying excretion and contributing to pancreatic autodigestion (12, 17). However, the detailed mechanisms of steroid-induced pancreatitis have not been elucidated. The association between side effects and suspected drug can be evaluated using the Naranjo ADR probability scale (13), and in this case, dexamethasone scored higher than other drugs, suggesting a stronger association with pancreatitis. By excluding gallstones, alcohol, and other common causes of pancreatitis, and based on the Naranjo score, dexamethasone-induced pancreatitis was diagnosed. In the previous case-control study by Sadr-Azodi et al., oral glucocorticoid (betamethasone and prednisolone) administration was associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.27-1.84) and the risk was highest 4 to 14 days after drug administration (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.31-2.28). Dexamethasone had not been studied in this study, however, it should also be considered as a potential cause of pancreatitis as an oral glucocorticoid (18).

Although there has been one case report of pancreatitis caused by dexamethasone administered for spinal cord compression, no previous report of pancreatitis caused by dexamethasone administered for supportive therapy for chemotherapy. In this case, dexamethasone was considered to be the cause of acute pancreatitis, and by omitting dexamethasone, it was possible to complete perioperative chemotherapy for the present patient.

4 Conclusion

Although steroid-induced acute pancreatitis is extremely rare, it should be recognized as a potential adverse event observed during cancer chemotherapy due to use of dexamethasone as antiemetic.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Kyushu University Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant for the publication of this case report.

Author contributions

HO: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TT: Writing – review & editing. YA: Writing – review & editing. TM: Writing – review & editing. KM: Writing – review & editing. KA: Writing – review & editing. EB: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank our patient for giving us permission to publish this case report.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin (2022) 72(1):7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E, Wieand S, Robidoux A, Margolese RG, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-18. J Clin Oncol (1997) 15(7):2483–93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.7.2483

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, Geyer CE, Kahlenberg MS, Robidoux A, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol (2008) 26(5):778–85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0235

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. van Nes JG, Putter H, Julien JP, Tubiana-Hulin M, van de Vijver M, Bogaerts J, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy is safe in early breast cancer, even after 10 years of follow-up; clinical and translational results from the EORTC trial 10902. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2009) 115(1):101–13. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0050-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. von Minckwitz G, Raab G, Caputo A, Schütte M, Hilfrich J, Blohmer JU, et al. Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer: the GEPARDUO study of the German breast group. J Clin Oncol (2005) 23(12):2676–85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer EP, Gradishar WJ, et al. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol (2003) 21(8):1431–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.081

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Boxhoorn L, Voermans RP, Bouwense SA, Bruno MJ, Verdonk RC, Boermeester M, et al. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet (2020) 396(10252):726–34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31310-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut (2013) 62(1):102–11. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Mederos MA, Reber HA, Girgis MD. Acute pancreatitis: A review. JAMA (2021) 325(4):382–90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.20317

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Mayerle J, Sendler M, Hegyi E, Beyer G, Lerch MM, Sahin-Tóth M. Genetics, cell biology, and pathophysiology of pancreatitis. Gastroenterology (2019) 156(7):1951–68.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.081

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox CM. Acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med (2016) 375(20):1972–81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1505202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Jones MR, Hall OM, Kaye AM, Kaye AD. Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: a review. Ochsner J (2015) 15(1):45–51.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

13. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther (1981) 30(2):239–45. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Levine RA, McGuire RF. Corticosteroid-induced pancreatitis: a case report demonstrating recurrence with rechallenge. Am J Gastroenterol (1988) 83(10):1161–4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

15. Badalov N, Baradarian R, Iswara K, Li J, Steinberg W, Tenner S. Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: an evidence-based review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2007) 5(6):648–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.11.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Crinelli R, Antonelli A, Bianchi M, Gentilini L, Scaramucci S, Magnani M. Selective inhibition of NF-kB activation and TNF-alpha production in macrophages by red blood cell-mediated delivery of dexamethasone. Blood Cells Mol Dis (2000) 26(3):211–22. doi: 10.1006/bcmd.2000.0298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ranta F, Avram D, Berchtold S, Düfer M, Drews G, Lang F, et al. Dexamethasone induces cell death in insulin-secreting cells, an effect reversed by exendin-4. Diabetes (2006) 55(5):1380–90. doi: 10.2337/db05-1220

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Sadr-Azodi O, Mattsson F, Bexlius TS, Lindblad M, Lagergren J, Ljung R. Association of oral glucocorticoid use with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis: a population-based nested case-control study. JAMA Intern Med (2013) 173(6):444–9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2737

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: breast cancer, adjuvant-chemotherapy, pancreatitis, dexamethasone, adverse effects

Citation: Ohmura H, Tobo T, Ando Y, Masuda T, Mimori K, Akashi K and Baba E (2024) Case report: A rare case of triple negative breast cancer with development of acute pancreatitis due to dexamethasone during adjuvant chemotherapy. Front. Oncol. 14:1340419. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1340419

Received: 17 November 2023; Accepted: 30 January 2024;
Published: 15 February 2024.

Edited by:

Yao Liu, Daping Hospital, China

Reviewed by:

Stephanie Dobersch, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, United States
Charushila Kadam, Sukh Sagar Medical College and Hospital, India

Copyright © 2024 Ohmura, Tobo, Ando, Masuda, Mimori, Akashi and Baba. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Eishi Baba, baba.eishi.889@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.