Risk factors of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study

Objective: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and severe adverse reaction in taxane-based chemotherapy. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors of peripheral neuropathy in patients with breast cancer receiving paclitaxel chemotherapy to provide a reference for the early prevention of CIPN.

Methods: We included 350 patients with breast cancer who received chemotherapy for the first time at the Tangshan People’s Hospital between August 2022 and June 2023 and were followed for at least 3 months after the end of chemotherapy. The incidence of CIPN in patients with breast cancer was calculated, and risk factors for CIPN were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

Results: The incidence rate of CIPN was 79.1%. Multifactor logistic regression analysis indicated that age ≥45 years [odds ratio (OR)=5.119, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.395–18.780] and ≥60 years (OR=9.366, 95% CI=1.228–71.421), history of hypertension (OR=3.475, 95% CI=1.073–11.250), cumulative dose of chemotherapy drugs >900 mg (OR=4.842, 95% CI=1.961–5.946), vitamin D deficiency (OR=6.214, 95% CI=2.308–16.729), abnormal alanine aminotransferase (OR=3.154, 95% CI=1.010–9.844), anemia before chemotherapy (OR=2.770, 95% CI=1.093–7.019), infusion duration of chemotherapy drugs >30 min (OR=3.673, 95% CI=1.414–9.539), body mass index ≥24 kg/m² (OR=8.139, 95% CI=1.157–57.240), mild depression (OR=4.546, 95% CI=1.358–15.223), and major depression (OR=4.455, 95% CI=1.237–16.037) increased the risk of CIPN. Having a regular caregiver (OR=0.223, 95% CI=0.087–0.573), high levels of physical activity (OR=0.071, 95% CI=0.008–0.647), and strong social support (OR=0.048, 95% CI=0.003–0.682) were protective factors against CIPN.

Conclusion: Clinical attention should be paid to patients with these risk factors, and active and effective preventive measures should be taken to reduce the occurrence of CIPN and improve the quality of life.

1 Introduction

Adjuvant chemotherapy is frequently needed for patients with breast cancer, and chemotherapy can improve the survival rate while reducing the risk of recurrence and metastasis. However, chemotherapy-associated toxicities have a negative impact on the patient recovery. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and serious adverse effect of chemotherapy with paclitaxel drugs. It is mainly characterized by sensory abnormalities, including numbness, tingling, burning pain, and increased sensitivity, in the distal limbs in a “sock-glove” distribution (1, 2). CIPN interferes with the daily life and patient activities, such as typing, writing, and buttoning up clothes, and increases the risk of falls and injuries. It frequently occurs during the period of chemotherapy; the incidence may reach 68.1–84%, and >30% of patients may experience chronic peripheral neuropathy. Patients experience symptoms for a long period (3), which seriously affects their functional status and quality of life and ultimately influences their survival. However, there is currently, no effective treatment for CIPN (4). Therefore, identifying effective predictive factors for the occurrence of CIPN has received increasing attention. Particularly, exploring risk factors for CIPN has become a hot research topic owing to the lack of predictors of CIPN (5). Known risk factors include cumulative dose (6), age ≥45 years (7), and body mass index (8); however, other factors, such as the duration of the patient’s chemotherapeutic drug infusion (9), functional activity (10), hepatic function, anemia (11), patient’s debilitating condition (12), and psycho-psychological factors (13), among many other potential risk factors, have yet to be adequately investigated. The National Cancer Institute Toxicity Scoring Criteria is currently the most frequently used clinical tool to diagnose CIPN (14). This study aimed to analyze the risk factors for CIPN in patients with breast cancer receiving paclitaxel chemotherapy to provide guidance for healthcare professionals to develop targeted preventive measures.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study design and population

This prospective cohort study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tangshan People’s Hospital (RMYY-LLKS-2022-055) and was conducted according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all patients.

The study employed an 80% certainty level based on previous studies, and calculated using the PASS software (NCSS Corp, Kaysville, UT, USA), with a target sample size of 320 patients. Patients with breast cancer treated with paclitaxel between August 2022 and June 2023 at Tangshan People’s Hospital were included in this study (Figure 1). The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) age ≥18 years; 2) breast cancer diagnosis confirmed through pathological examination; 3) treatment with taxane-based chemotherapeutic drugs; 4) peripheral neuropathy grade 0 according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; 5) absence of psychiatric disorders or communication barriers; 6) normal hearing; 7) sufficient reading, expression, and communication abilities; and 8) ability to cooperate in completing the questionnaire surveys. The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) metastasis to other sites; 2) severe cardiac, hepatic, renal, or other organ dysfunction; 3) electrolyte imbalance, other systemic diseases, or severe diabetic neuropathy; 4) peripheral neuropathy caused by intoxication, infection, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or other factors; and 5) a history of breast cancer recurrence and chemotherapy treatment before recurrence. Finally, 350 patients were included.

Figure 1

Figure 1 Patient inclusion flowchart.

2.2 Study protocol

This study used the time of the patient’s first chemotherapy session as the starting point for follow-up. Follow-up assessments were performed after each chemotherapy cycle. The study endpoint was the occurrence of CIPN events or the end of the follow-up period if no CIPN occurred. During this period, basic and relevant data on patients who had CIPN were recorded. General patient information was collected through face-to-face interviews, and relevant laboratory indicators were reviewed in the electronic medical record system.

The general demographic characteristics questionnaire was designed by the researchers. Data on general demographic characteristics, daily behavior habits, past medical history, and related laboratory indicators of the patients were collected. CIPN was evaluated according to international standards using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (14), as follows: grade 0: normal findings; grade 1: loss of tendon reflex or abnormal sensation (including paresthesia); grade 2: altered or abnormal sensations (including paresthesia) affecting limb function without impacting daily activities; grade 3: altered or abnormal sensations (including paresthesia) affecting daily activities; grade 4: life-threatening consequences requiring urgent intervention; and grade 5: death.

Psychological evaluation was performed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (15). Briefly, this tool is composed of 14 entries, including 7 anxiety self-assessment scales and 7 depression self-assessment scales. The scores of the two subscales of anxiety and depression are added, and patients with scores of 0–7 are classified as asymptomatic; 8–10, symptomatic and suspicious; and 11–21, definitely symptomatic. Sleep quality was evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale (16). Entries were categorized into the following seven dimensions: subjective sleep quality, time to sleep, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disorders, hypnotic medications, and daytime functioning. Each component was scored 0–3, and the cumulative score of each component was the total Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale score. The scores ranged from 0–21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. Social support was evaluated using the Social Support Rating Scale (17). Briefly, this scale comprises the following three dimensions: objective support (three items), subjective support (four items), and support utilization (three items). The total score is 12–66, with higher scores indicating higher levels of social support. Physical activity was evaluated using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (18). Specifically, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form, which included three sections of walking, moderate physical activity, and heavy physical activity and a total of seven questions, was used. Total energy values were calculated based on the metabolic equivalent corresponding to each type of physical activity.

2.3 Statical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, N.Y, USA). Categorical data are described using frequency counts and percentages. Single-factor analysis was conducted using the chi-square test and single-factor logistic regression analysis. Multifactor analysis was performed using binary logistic regression analysis. Variables that exhibited statistical significance in the single-factor analysis were included in the multifactor binary logistic regression analysis. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each factor to identify the risk factors. The significance level for testing was set at a two-tailed α=0.05.

3 Results

3.1 Univariate analysis of CIPN in patients with breast cancer

All patients were female; 273 patients had CIPN, and 77 patients did not have CIPN, with a prevalence rate of 79.1%. The patients’ age ranged from 26 years to 75 years, with a mean of 52.44 ± 10.252 years. Overall, 30.3%, 43.7%, and 26.0% of the patients were aged 18–44, 45–59, and ≥60 years, respectively, and 47.1% were not menopausal, and 52.9% were menopausal. Regarding education, 22.9% of the patients had an education level of elementary school or below; 40.9%, junior high school; 24.9%, senior high school or middle school; and 11.4%, college or above. Additionally, 11.4% of the patients were married. Regarding marital status, 90.3%, 6.3%, and 3.4% of the patients were married, divorced, and widowed, respectively. The molecular types were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ in 35.1%; luminal A in 28.6%; luminal B in 28.6%, and triple negative in 7.7%. The cumulative chemotherapeutic drug dose was ≤900 mg and >900 mg in 46.6% and 53.4%, respectively.

Single-factor analysis revealed statistically significant differences in age, menopausal status, body mass index, body surface area, duration of chemotherapy infusion, daily water intake after chemotherapy, presence of a caregiver, hypertension, diabetes, tumor node metastasis stage, cumulative chemotherapy dose, vitamin D deficiency, abnormal alanine transaminase levels, abnormal aspartate transaminase levels, glucose abnormalities, pre-chemotherapy anemia, physical activity level, anxiety, depression, social support, and sleep quality (all P<0.05) between the patients with and without CIPN. These were potential risk factors for CIPN development. However, education level, marital status, occupational status, smoking, alcohol consumption, heart disease, mode of surgery, white blood cell count, debilitating lymphocyte count, and healthy lifestyle were not significant (P >0.05) and were not associated with the occurrence of CIPN. Further details are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Table 1 Univariate analysis of significant factors of peripheral neuropathy in patients with and without CIPN (n=350).

3.2 Binary logistic multivariate analysis of CIPN in patients with breast cancer

Using the presence of peripheral neuropathy as the dependent variable, the variables with statistical significance in the univariate analysis were set as independent variables in the multivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age 45–59 years (OR=5.119) and ≥60 years (OR=9.366), history of hypertension (OR=3.475), cumulative dose of chemotherapy drugs >400 mg (OR=4.842), vitamin D deficiency (OR=6.214), alanine transaminase abnormality (OR=3.154), pre-chemotherapy anemia (OR=2.770), chemotherapy drug infusion duration >30 min (OR=3.673), body mass index ≥24 kg/m² (OR=8.139), mild depression (OR=4.546), and severe depression (OR=4.455) were risk factors for CIPN in patients with breast cancer. Meanwhile, having a caregiver (OR=0.002), higher levels of physical activity (OR=0.071), and higher levels of social support (OR=0.048) were protective factors. Further details are presented in Table 2. Risk factors are those that cause CIPN or increase the probability of its occurrence; protective factors are those that prevent or minimize the occurrence of CIPN.

Table 2

Table 2 Multivariate analysis of independent predictive factors of the development of CIPN (n=350).

4 Discussion

This study found a significant correlation between age and CIPN, with older patients (≥45 years) being more likely to experience neurotoxicity during chemotherapy. This is consistent with the results of Pabst et al. (19). This may be due to the gradual decline in organ function with age. Older adults may have worse circulation and metabolism than younger adults. Additionally, decreased cellular repair capacity and neurotrophic deficits may account for the higher susceptibility and severe CIPN in older adults (20). Therefore, when dealing with peripheral neuropathy in patients with breast cancer, medical staff should pay more attention to elderly patients. Furthermore, more research is needed on the risk and protective factors of CIPN in older adults to prevent and treat CIPN more effectively.

This study found that hypertension is a risk factor for CIPN in patients with breast cancer. Long-term hypertension can lead to chronic peripheral vascular damage or peripheral tissue changes, and the increase in blood pressure can lead to the damage of vascular pressure sensor function, resulting in the decline of autonomic nervous regulation function in patients, and the two form a vicious circle to aggravate autonomic neuropathy (21). Therefore, hypertension can damage the autonomic nerve function and subsequently aggravate peripheral neuropathy. Therefore, it is crucial to pay attention to blood pressure control and implement corresponding preventive measures in patients with breast cancer who have hypertension.

In general, the required chemotherapy dose increases with the patient’s body mass index. This increases the incidence and severity of CIPN. Furthermore, the relationship between body mass index and the nervous system is complex. Obese patients frequently have underlying conditions, such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and osteoarthritis. Chemotherapy with taxanes (e.g., paclitaxel) can exacerbate peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes. Additionally, animal model studies have shown that obesity can lead to microvascular damage and peripheral nervous system dysfunction (20). Moreover, studies have suggested that obesity is a risk factor for other neuropathies, such as oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (22) and diabetic neuropathic conditions (23). In this context, to protect the health of patients, medical staff training on the assessment and management of CIPN symptoms should be increased, and early and correct assessment and intervention measures should be provided in patients with a high body mass index. Overweight patients should be advised to control their body weight, eat small meals, and engage in physical exercise.

This study found a correlation between vitamin D deficiency and CIPN. This may be because vitamin D potentially plays a role in axonal repair, making vitamin D-deficient patients more susceptible to severe CIPN. Vitamin D can induce the expression of nerve growth factor, which can promote the growth, maturation, and differentiation of neurons; maintain the normal physiological function of nerve cells; and repair damaged nerve cells. However, reductions in nerve growth factor can make nerve fibers vulnerable to damage by various factors (24, 25). These findings are consistent with the results of our analysis and provide a strong rationale for confirmatory studies on the association between pretreatment vitamin D deficiency and PN in large independent prospective cumulative patient cohorts receiving paclitaxel and other neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents (26). Therefore, healthcare providers should advise patients to supplement vitamin D in a timely manner to prevent CIPN.

Chemotherapy-induced liver damage and pre-chemotherapy anemia are common during treatment in patients with cancer. Chemotherapeutic drugs can directly damage liver cells, leading to liver damage and elevated transaminase levels. They can also cause sinusoidal liver injury, leading to cholestatic hepatitis, elevated bilirubin levels, or a combination of the two. Given that most chemotherapeutic drugs are primarily metabolized and excreted by the liver, any impairment in liver function can alter the metabolism and secretion of these drugs, prolonging their action time and potentially increasing the incidence and severity of neuropathy. Although anemia is relatively common in patients with cancer, research on the relationship between anemia and CIPN is limited. In this study, patients with concomitant anemia were more likely to have CIPN. This may have been because of anemia-induced hypoxia in the peripheral tissues, as shown in previous studies. Peripheral tissue hypoxia can affect the function of the peripheral nervous system, and protein synthesis disturbances caused by tissue hypoxia can affect the repair of peripheral nerve damage (20). Clinicians should pay more attention to preventing neurotoxicity in patients with liver dysfunction and pre-chemotherapy anemia when administering chemotherapeutic drugs.

The results of this study showed that patients with breast cancer who received chemotherapy infusions for more than 30 min had a higher risk of developing CIPN. The possible reasons for this include drug metabolism and metabolite production. Rapid infusion can achieve steady-state drug concentrations faster, thereby reducing metabolite formation and potential side effects (27). Additionally, increasing the infusion time of the drug can prolong the time that paclitaxel remains in the body, resulting in a more extensive distribution of the drug in the extravascular and/or tissue compartments, thereby increasing the risk of CIPN. Therefore, clinicians should attempt to keep the infusion duration to within 30 min. We also found that depression and social support are risk factors for CIPN in patients with breast cancer, which aligns with the results of previous studies (4, 28, 29). Specifically, depression and social support can influence the occurrence of CIPN owing to the impact of physiological, psychological, and environmental factors on CIPN symptoms. Even when experiencing similar symptoms, individuals may present with diverse manifestations due to variations in their perceptions of physiological, psychological, and environmental factors (30). Social support provides patients with material and emotional assistance. It can also guide patients in communicating and interacting with others, using positive coping strategies to manage their symptoms, and developing an accurate understanding of CIPN. Moreover, high levels of social support can facilitate an early return to society and improve social functioning. Therefore, nurses should emphasize the positive impact of social support on CIPN symptoms. They should encourage patients to actively seek social support and engage in social activities, promote peer support and sharing, bolster patient confidence, enhance follow-up care, promptly identify issues, and provide guidance and assistance. Patients can be encouraged to help and understand each other through face-to-face, telephone, and Internet communication and other forms of mutual support and experience sharing. Related health education should also be provided to family members of patients, and follow-up work should be strengthened for vulnerable groups with low social support levels.

Our results showed that patients with breast cancer with a regular caregiver had a lower incidence of CIPN than those without a regular caregiver. This could be because patients with a regular caregiver usually have family members accompanying them during hospitalization (28). These caregivers had close contact with healthcare professionals and gained a better understanding of preventive nursing measures for CIPN. Therefore, they are better equipped to assist patients in preventing CIPN in their daily lives and improve the patient’s quality of life. Additionally, patients with a fixed caregiver can be accompanied to the toilet during the infusion of chemotherapy drugs; therefore, they are more likely to drink large amounts of water. This helps shorten the retention time of the drug, which may reduce the incidence and severity of neurotoxicity.

The results of this study showed that a low level of physical activity is an influential factor in the development of CIPN in patients with breast cancer. This is consistent with the findings of Srivastava et al. (31). Exercise has a positive effect on reducing CIPN symptoms in patients with cancer (32). This is because exercise prevents axonal degeneration, promotes axonal regeneration of injured peripheral nerves, reduces nociceptive hypersensitivity after peripheral nerve injury and promotes functional recovery, increases the expression of neurotrophic factors, improves the compensatory capacity of normal nerve fibers, and enhances the antioxidant activity of mitochondria (33). Our result suggests that in patients with breast cancer, CIPN symptoms can be managed through exercise interventions. Exercise intensity and duration should be tailored according to the physical activity level of chemotherapy patients, facilitating the establishment of a regular exercise routine and helping to prevent symptom deterioration.

This study had some limitations. First, it investigated only patients with breast cancer. Second, some patients used oral vitamin B6 for neurotrophic purposes during data collection, which may have affected the results of this study, although validity was not affected. Third, this was a cross-sectional study, and future studies should conduct a follow-up over a longer period. Finally, this study analyzed the correlation between influencing factors and CIPN to explore clinically significant risk factors for clinical reference. Future multicenter large-scale studies with longer follow-up observations are needed to explore the development of CIPN and provide a more scientific basis for the prevention and intervention of CIPN in patients receiving chemotherapy.

5 Conclusion

The primary risk factors for the occurrence of CIPN in patients with breast patients are age, history of hypertension, cumulative dose of chemotherapy drugs, vitamin D deficiency, abnormal liver function, pre-chemotherapy anemia, chemotherapy infusion duration >30 min, body mass index ≥24 kg/m², depression, lack of a regular caregiver, low physical activity level, and low social support level. Therefore, when administering chemotherapy in clinical practice, close attention should be given to individuals with these factors, and proactive and effective preventive measures should be implemented to reduce the occurrence of peripheral neuropathy, improve quality of life, and prolong survival.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Tangshan People’s Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

SL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YX: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. GL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Software, Writing – original draft. ZL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. DR: Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. YH: Investigation, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. ZC: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YF: Formal analysis, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Key Research and Development Program of Hebei Province (No.21377748D); Medical Science Research Project of Hebei Province (No. 20231807); Talent Support Project of Tangshan City (No.A202301005).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

CIPN, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy; OR, odds ratio.

References

1. Park SB, Goldstein D, Krishnan AV, Lin CS, Friedlander ML, Cassidy J, et al. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: a critical analysis. CA Cancer J Clin. (2013) 63:419–37. doi: 10.3322/caac.21204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Brewer JR, Morrison G, Dolan ME, Fleming GF. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: Current status and progress. Gynecol Oncol. (2016) 140:176–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ibrahim EY, Ehrlich BE. Prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A review of recent findings. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. (2020) 145:102831. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.102831

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Staff NP, Grisold A, Grisold W, Windebank AJ. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A current review. Ann Neurol. (2017) 81:772–81. doi: 10.1002/ana.24951

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Miltenburg NC, Boogerd W. Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy: A comprehensive survey. Cancer Treat Rev. (2014) 40:872–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.04.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kim HS, Kim M, Lee SH. Symptom clusters in Korean patients with metastatic cancer undergoing palliative chemotherapy. J Hospice Palliative Nurs. (2016) 18:292–9. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000240

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Barginear M, Dueck AC, Allred JB, Bunnell C, Cohen HJ, Freedman RA, et al. Age and the risk of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy in women with early-stage breast cancer (Alliance A151411): Results from 1,881 patients from cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 40101. Oncologist. (2019) 24:617–23. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ghoreishi Z, Keshavarz S, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Fathifar Z, Goodman KA, et al. Risk factors for paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with breast cancer. BMC Cancer. (2018) 18(1):958. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4869-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Kishimoto S, Oshima N, Rinker M, Krishna MC, Takebe N. Identification of high-risk drugs related to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program– sponsored phase I trials. Eur J Cancer. (2019) 1:111–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Sánchez-Barroso L, Apellaniz-Ruiz M, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez G, Santos M, Roldán-Romero JM, Curras M, et al. Concomitant medications and risk of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Oncologist. (2019) 24:784–92. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0418

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Trendowski MR, Lusk CM, Ruterbusch JJ, Seaton R, Simon MS, Greenwald MK, et al. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in African American cancer survivors: Risk factors and quality of life outcomes. Cancer Med. (2021) 10:8151–61. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4328

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Shahriari-Ahmadi A, Fahimi A, Payandeh M, Sadeghi M. Prevalence of oxaliplatin-induced chronic neuropathy and influencing factors in patients with colorectal cancer in Iran. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. (2015) 16:7603–6. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.17.7603

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Verhoeff-Jahja R, Ter Kuile MM, Weijl NI, Oosterkamp R, Cloos M, Portielje JEA, et al. Anxiety symptoms but not depression symptoms before taxane chemotherapy initiation are associated with peripheral neuropathy: a multicenter study in women with breast cancer. Supporting Cancer Care August. (2022) 30:6947–53. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07093-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Glozah FN, Pevalin DJ. Psychometric properties of the perceived social support from family and friends scale: Data from an adolescent sample in Ghana. J Child Family Stud. (2017) 26:88–100. doi: 10.1007/s10826-016-0535-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Cheng HL, Molassiotis A. Longitudinal validation and comparison of the Chinese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer-Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity subscale (FACT/GOG-Ntx). Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. (2019) 15(1):56–62. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lu T- Y, Li Y-XP, Zhang G-Q, Wu D. Reliability and validity of Pittsburgh sleep Quality index. Chongqing Med. (2014) 43:260–3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2014.03.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Xiao S. Social support rating scale. Chin J Ment Health. (1993) 7:42.

Google Scholar

18. Watz H, Krippner F, Kirsten A, Magnussen H, Vogelmeier C. Indacaterol improves lung hyperinflation and physical activity in patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. BMC Pulm Med. (2014) 14:158. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-14-158

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Pabst L, Velten M, Fischbach C, Kalish M, Pflumio C, Pivot X, et al. Persistent taxan-induced neuropathy in elderly patients treated for localized breast cancer. Breast Journal December. (2020) 26:2376–82. doi: 10.1111/tbj.14123

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wang Y-q, Yang X-j, Wei X-c. Analysis of influencing factors of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity. Tianjin Pharm. (2017) 29:25–9.

Google Scholar

21. Ji W, Chu Q. Mechanisms and therapeutic advances in chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity. Chin J Oncol. (2012) 21:354–7.

Google Scholar

22. Gao P, Han Y. Clinical characteristics and influencing factors of peripheral neuropathy in elderly patients with diabetes. Chin J Gerontology. (2020) 40:2958–60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2020.14.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Song M, Li L, Chang Z, Meng Y, Chang J. Clinical observation of venlafaxine in the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. Chin J Cancer Prev Control. (2013) 20:546–9.

Google Scholar

24. Bandos H, Melnikow J, Rivera DR, Swain SM, Sturtz K, Fehrenbacher L, et al. Long-term peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy: NRG Oncology/NSABP B-30. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2018) 110(2):149–56. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx162

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Tanabe Y, Hashimoto K, Shimizu C, Hirakawa A, Harano K, Yunokawa M, et al. Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol. (2013) 18:132–8. doi: 10.1007/s10147-011-0352-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Zirpoli GR, McCann SE, Sucheston-Campbell LE, Hershman DL, Ciupak G, Davis W, et al. Supplement use and chemo-induced peripheral neuropathy in a cooperative group trial (S0221): The DELCaP Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2017) 109(12):1–8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx098

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Yoon YJ, Park JS. Factors influencing peripheral neuropathy of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Asian Oncol Nurs. (2019) 19:71–80. doi: 10.5388/aon.2019.19.2.71

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Hong Y, Xu C, Yu H, Li X, Wang Q, Ren L. Analysis of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and influencing factors in cancer patients. Chin J Nurs Education. (2019) 16:892–6. doi: 10.3761.j.issn.1672-9234.2019.12.003

Google Scholar

29. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling Vol. 16. . New York: The Guilford Press (2015).

Google Scholar

30. Knoerl R, Gilchrist L, Kanzawa-Lee GA, Donohoe C, Bridges C, Lavoie Smith EM. Proactive rehabilitation for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Semin Oncol Nurs. (2020) 36:150983. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.150983

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Srivastava SP, Sinha AP, Sharma KK, Malik PS. Severity, risk factors and quality of life of patients associated with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Clin Nurs Res. (2022) 31:1080–90. doi: 10.1177/10547738221085613

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Zha R, Liu S, Zeng M, He H. Multi-mode exercise intervention in patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. J Nurs. (2019) 38:25–30. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2023.02.025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Chung KH, Park SB, Streckmann F, Wiskemann J, Mohile N, Kleckner AS, et al. Mechanisms, mediators, and moderators of the effects of exercise on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Cancers (Basel). (2022) 14:1224. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051224

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar