Case report: Isolated axillary lymph node metastasis in high-risk endometrial cancer

Introduction: There are risks of developing distant metastases over time for both early- and advanced-stage endometrial cancer. Axillary lymph node metastasis as the first site of recurrence, whether isolated or non-isolated, is uncommon, and there are currently no established treatment guidelines for such cases. This study highlights four cases of recurrent endometrial cancer that manifested axillary lymph node metastasis, providing a comprehensive review of their distinctive clinical behavior and the treatment strategies employed.

Methods: We reviewed and compared four cases of recurrent endometrial cancer that developed axillary lymph node metastasis following adjuvant treatment. Patients’ perspectives were also discussed.

Results: All four patients had aggressive endometrial histology, including high-grade serous carcinoma and carcinosarcoma. The stages at presentation were stages I and III, with laparotomy or laparoscopy used as the initial surgical approach. Axillary lymph node metastasis was the primary site of recurrence in three cases. Of the three patients with isolated axillary lymph node metastasis, two had long-term survival after aggressive locoregional treatment comprising surgery and radiation.

Conclusion: Axillary lymph node metastasis as the first site of recurrence is rare, even in high-risk endometrial cancer. In addition to systemic chemotherapy, aggressive locoregional treatment can potentially maximize the chance of long-term disease control.

1 Introduction

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in the United States, with an estimated 66,200 new cases diagnosed by 2023 (1). The 5-year relative survival rate is 94.9% for localized uterine cancer and decreases significantly to 69.8% and 18.4% in regional and distant stages, respectively (1). Approximately 6%–10% of early-stage endometrial cancers (2) and 27% of advanced-stage endometrial cancers develop distant metastasis over time (3, 4). The most common sites of distant metastasis include the pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, vagina, peritoneum, and lungs (5). High-risk histologies, such as serous carcinoma and carcinosarcoma, can spread hematogenously to the parenchyma of the liver, spleen, supraclavicular lymph nodes, and even the brain (6). Axillary lymph node metastasis presenting as the first site of recurrence, whether isolated or non-isolated, is uncommon and has not been widely reported. We present four cases of recurrent endometrial cancer that developed axillary lymph node metastasis after completing adjuvant treatment and provide an in-depth discussion of their distinctive clinical behavior and the various treatment strategies employed.

2 Case description

2.1 Case 1

A 60-year-old female G0P0, with no significant past medical or family history, had atypical glandular cells on routine Pap smear and endometrioid adenocarcinoma on dilation and curettage. She underwent total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LND), and pelvic washing in 2014. Pathology showed uterine serous carcinoma (two of 50 mm myometrial invasion and pT1a) with one pelvic lymph node involvement (pN1), FIGO stage IIIC1. The peritoneal fluid cytology was positive for malignant cells. She received adjuvant treatment with three cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by pelvic radiation and an additional three cycles of chemotherapy. Twenty-nine months after her initial diagnosis, she palpated an enlarged left axillary lymph node was confirmed to be a metastatic high-grade papillary adenocarcinoma by biopsy. PET/CT showed mildly increased FDG uptake in the left axillary lymph nodes that measured 1.1 cm, there was no hypermetabolic adenopathy or other sites of metastasis. Since the patient had residual neuropathy after the first-line treatment and strongly preferred a treatment that caused minimal alopecia, she was treated with four cycles of carboplatin and liposomal doxorubicin. A repeat workup showed stable disease without distant metastasis. She underwent left axillary LND which revealed five of 19 lymph nodes were positive for metastatic serous carcinoma. The patient then received radiation 5040cGy to the left axillary area. Five months after radiation, a physical examination revealed a palpable enlarged inguinal lesion and a palpable vaginal mass. Biopsy confirmed both as recurrent uterine serous carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) protein was not performed at the time of the initial diagnosis. However, next generation sequencing (NGS) performed at the time of vaginal recurrence showed the tumor to be microsatellite stable, with a tumor mutational burden of 4 mut/Mb, and p53 mutation. She received six cycles of weekly paclitaxel over a five-month period. She was then switched to alternating megestrol acetate and tamoxifen after CT revealed mild progression, and the disease remained stable for 14 months. The treatment was later changed to pembrolizumab and lenvatinib. She also received stereotactic body radiation therapy to the vaginal and right inguinal lesions while continuing on pembrolizumab and lenvatinib to this date for a total of 37 months, and cell-free DNA test for minimal disease showed no detectable tumor DNA. She is currently alive and doing well 117 months after the initial diagnosis (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1 Timeline of Case #1.

Patient perspectives: The patient was very optimistic about her prognosis. She was glad that she followed our recommendations for locoregional treatments. She wanted to balance her quality of life with longevity of life and treatment with curative intent. The side effects of the current treatment were greatly diminished after we extended the treatment interval of pembrolizumab to every 6 weeks and gave her a week’s break every 4 weeks with lenvatinib.

2.2 Case 2

A 70-year-old female (G2P2), with hypertension, presented with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB). Her aunt had breast cancer. She was diagnosed with high-grade uterine carcinosarcoma after an endometrial biopsy in 2012. The patient underwent TAH, BSO, omentectomy, and pelvic washing. The pelvic lymph nodes were not accessible because of extensive adhesions at the time of surgery. Final pathology showed uterine carcinosarcoma, pT1a, with one of 22 mm myometrial invasion and pathological stage IA. Peritoneal fluid cytology results were negative. NGS and MMR analyses were not performed. She was treated with six cycles of adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by pelvic external beam radiation and vaginal cuff brachytherapy. Twenty-five months after the initial diagnosis, the patient had an enlarged right axillary lymph node, and biopsy showed metastatic carcinosarcoma. PET/CT showed no other sites of recurrence. She underwent right axillary LND, and pathology confirmed metastatic uterine carcinosarcoma in one out of eight lymph nodes. The patient declined systemic therapy at the time of recurrence but agreed to undergo chemoradiation. She received concurrent chemoradiation at the axillary site at 4,500 cGy and three doses of weekly cisplatin as a radiosensitizer. Since then, she has been under surveillance and remains cancer-free. She is currently alive and doing well, 134 months after the initial diagnosis (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Figure 2 Timeline of Case #2.

Patient perspectives: The patient was grateful for her response to the previous aggressive locoregional treatment of recurrent axillary disease, which led to a favorable outcome. She was motivated to remain vigilant and undergo regular surveillance examinations and scans to detect recurrence as early as possible.

2.3 Case 3

A 68-year-old female (G10P5) with a history of Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia presented with PMB and abdominal pain. The patient had no family history of cancer. Endometrial biopsy revealed carcinosarcoma. She underwent robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RATLH), BSO, bilateral pelvic and para-aortic LND, and omental biopsy in 2019. The final pathology showed carcinosarcoma of the uterus (involving 90% of the myometrium, 20 of 22 mm). There was pelvic (11 of 20 positive) and para-aortic lymph node (five out of seven positive) involvement with extranodal spread in para-aortic lymph nodes (FIGO stage IIIC2). The carcinoma component is a mixture of serous and dedifferentiated carcinomas. NGS showed that the tumor was microsatellite stable, with a tumor mutational burden of 8 mut/Mb, BRD4 mutation, and p53 mutation. Shortly after two cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel, the patient developed large-volume ascites and peritoneal carcinomatosis. She showed a short-term response to weekly gemcitabine treatment and was started on pembrolizumab and lenvatinib five months after her initial diagnosis. A follow-up CT scan showed near-complete resolution of the ascites and omental caking. However, after receiving pembrolizumab and lenvatinib for 11 months, she was found to have a newly developed vaginal cuff mass and a newly enlarged right axillary lymph node on physical examination. Both were biopsied and confirmed to be metastatic carcinosarcomas. Subsequently, she experienced rapid disease progression and gradual deterioration of performance status. The patient died from acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19, 21 months after her initial diagnosis (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Figure 3 Timeline of Case #3.

Patient perspectives: not able to be obtained as the patient passed away.

2.4 Case 4

A 63-year-old female (G3P3) with hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, and hypercholesterolemia presented with PMB and abdominal cramps in 2021. Her brother had prostate cancer. Endometrial biopsy revealed uterine serous carcinoma. The patient underwent RATLH, BSO, pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy, omental biopsy, and pelvic washing. The final pathology showed uterine serous carcinoma (tumor only on a polyp, no myometrial invasion, pT1a) with negative pelvic sentinel lymph node involvement (pN0), FIGO stage IA. Peritoneal fluid cytology was negative. IHC staining showed MMR proficiency, estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity, and p53 mutation. She was treated with four cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel but declined vaginal brachytherapy. Twelve months after treatment, her CA-125 level had increased from the normal range to 127. CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis was unremarkable; however, a PET/CT revealed an isolated hypermetabolic pathologically enlarged right axillary lymph node. A biopsy of the axillary lymph node confirmed it to be a metastatic, poorly differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma. She was started on carboplatin and paclitaxel treatment and had an allergic reaction to carboplatin in cycle two. Pembrolizumab was added to cycle 3 in combination with paclitaxel. Repeat CT scan showed that the right axillary lymph node had decreased in size, and the patient was recommended to undergo surgical axillary lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant radiation treatment and maintenance treatment with pembrolizumab. However, the patient declined surgery and remained on paclitaxel and pembrolizumab until this date, 29 months after her initial diagnosis (Figure 4).

Figure 4

Figure 4 Timeline of Case #4. BPPLND, bilateral pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection; BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; LN, lymph node; TAH, total abdominal hysterectomy; TLH, total laparoscopic hysterectomy; PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; PSLNB, pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy; SBRT, stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Patient perspectives: The patient was pleased that the tumor responded to treatment and had decreased in size. However, she was concerned that surgical resection of the axillary mass would spread the tumor. The patient has been undergoing declining surgery.

3 Discussion

Axillary lymph node metastasis is uncommon in any type of gynecologic cancer and has not been well reviewed. In our series of four cases, three cases developed isolated axillary lymph node metastasis as the first site of recurrence. In one case, it was the harbinger of a second large-volume disease recurrence. Of the three patients with isolated axillary lymph node metastasis, two had long-term survival after aggressive locoregional treatment, including surgery and radiation. As of November 2023, three of the four patients were alive, under surveillance, or received systemic therapy. Their overall survival ranged from 24 months to 128 months after the initial diagnosis.

The majority of extrauterine spread in endometrial cancer involves the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. In a retrospective study from Italy on high-risk early-stage patients with endometrial cancer, the observed occurrence was 3.3% in both pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes in those who underwent lymphadenectomy (7). In the evaluation of uncommon lymph node recurrence other than the above sites, an earlier single institutional study of 22 patients with endometrial cancer documented the first recurrence sites to be the inguinal, supraclavicular, and axillary lymph nodes (8). There were two cases of axillary lymph node metastasis: one had simultaneous supracervical lymph node metastasis, and the other had isolated axillary lymph node involvement. The latter patient had a history of stage III endometrial cancer at diagnosis and was treated with surgical excision and high-dose radiotherapy (≥5,000 cGy).

The metastatic route of gynecologic cancers to the axillary lymph node is postulated by two routes: (1) transthoracic lymphatic drainage or the transdiaphragmatic route, and (2) the posterior route (9). In the transdiaphragmatic route, such as in the presence of ascites and peritoneal carcinomatosis, tumor cells cross the diaphragm and invade the superior diaphragmatic lymph node. The tumor cells then drain toward the prepericardial and parasternal lymph nodes and continue directly to the internal jugular and subclavian veins or the subclavian lymph trunk and thoracic duct. The posterior route gathers all lymphatic pathways from the deep lymphatic vessels inferior to the diaphragm (iliac, para-aortic, and mesenteric) and superficial lymphatic vessels inferior to the level of the umbilicus. This lymphatic drainage unification forms the cisterna chyli and thoracic duct, which travels in the posterior mediastinum and drains into the junction of the left subclavian and internal jugular veins. Notably, drainage from the left subclavian and internal jugular veins to the axillary lymph nodes presumably follows the reverse route. In addition, isolated axillary lymph node recurrence also represents a “skipping” metastasis along the way. In a small series in which PET/CT was used to evaluate advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer, a significant number of patients had supradiaphragmatic lymph node metastasis (9).

When reviewing the routes of axillary lymph node metastasis, each case showed a unique pattern. Case #3 had widespread peritoneal carcinomatosis and retroperitoneal lymph node involvement, which likely contributed to right axillary lymph node metastasis through both the transdiaphragmatic and posterior routes. Case #1 had positive pelvic cytology and pelvic lymph node involvement, and both characteristics could potentially lead to disease spread via the transdiaphragmatic and posterior lymphatic drainage routes. However, in cases #2 and #4, neither the transdiaphragmatic nor the posterior route could explain the cause of the right axillary lymph node metastasis. There were no malignant cells in the pelvic washing or peritoneal carcinomatosis. Although case #2 was incompletely staged, the fact that she did not develop disease in the pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes indicates that the posterior route of lymphatic drainage was not a contributing factor to axillary lymph node metastasis.

All four patients received adjuvant chemotherapy after their initial diagnosis because of aggressive histology. Patients in cases #1 and #2 received sequential chemotherapy and pelvic radiation based on multiple phase II study results available at that time (10, 11). Currently, systemic therapy is considered the foundation of adjuvant therapy in patients with extrauterine diseases. Two prospective randomized control studies (RCT) demonstrated the effectiveness of concurrent chemoradiation with cisplatin and external-beam radiation followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel in treating advanced-stage endometrial cancer (3, 12). For high-risk uterine cancer with disease limited to the uterus, we applied the treatment strategy endorsed by the GOG 249 study, which demonstrated the similar efficacy of either pelvic radiation or vaginal brachytherapy followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel (13) This treatment was used in case #4. Notably, concurrent chemoradiation with cisplatin and external-beam radiation followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel can be a reasonable option as well (3, 12) Patients in cases #1 and #3 also received pembrolizumab and lenvatinib at the time of disease progression and benefited from prolonged disease control (14, 15). This real-world evidence supports the efficacy of this regimen in both slow-growing, low-volume disease as well as rapidly progressing, high-volume disease of carcinosarcoma. With the newest evidence demonstrating survival benefits in treating advanced stage endometrial cancer, including carcinosarcoma, with immunotherapy in addition to front-line chemotherapy (16, 17), we expect to see a change in the treatment paradigm that may further impact the recurrence pattern.

All four patients had aggressive histology (serous carcinoma and carcinosarcoma) and either stage I or stage III disease at presentation. IHC and NGS testing showed no definite differences in predicting axillary recurrence (Table 1). However, isolated axillary lymph node metastasis, as presented in cases #1 and #2, appears to predict a disease characteristic of truly isolated oligometastasis and a more indolent course. Neither case #1 nor case #2 ever had axillary recurrence after receiving aggressive locoregional treatment for axillary lymph node metastasis with curative intent. These included axillary LND, radiation followed by systemic chemotherapy, and concurrent chemoradiation. Most importantly, neither case #1 nor case #2 developed widespread distant metastasis. The clinical progression pattern observed in cases #1 and #2 suggests that aggressive locoregional treatment could improve disease control in isolated axillary lymph node metastasis. Our observation is consistent with a previous study by Foote et al. that in their series of 22 patients with isolated peripheral lymph node recurrence, six patients remained free of disease at a median follow-up of 27 months. This observation and hypothesis were the basis for the recommendation of the treatment plan for case #4.

Table 1

Table 1 Diagnosis, tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcome for the four cases.

Of note, in cases #1 and #2, adjuvant radiation was applied to the axilla to ensure sterilization of cancer cells in all the potential tumor-involved lymph nodes, and no further axillary recurrence developed. A new method for intraoperative lymph node assessment was developed using optical coherence tomography (18). Lymph node dissection can become more accurate with the advancement of this technology,.

In conclusion, axillary lymph node metastasis as the first site of recurrence is uncommon and is more often seen in endometrial cancer with high-risk histologies. There was no direct association between isolated axillary lymph node metastasis and disease stage at diagnosis. This recurrence pattern may not be due to a disseminated recurrence or metastasis. We recommend aggressive loco-regional treatment in addition to systemic treatment to maximize the chance of long-term disease control.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Maimonides Medical Center Institutional Review Board. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with national legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/patient(s) for the publication of this case report.

Author contributions

YAC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MO: Writing – original draft. YX: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

YX received compensation from participating in community advisory boards with Abbvie Inc. and AstraZeneca PLC.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Surveillance E, and End Results Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Uterine Cancer (2023). Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html.

Google Scholar

2. Creutzberg CL, Nout RA, Lybeert ML, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, Jobsen JJ, Mens JW, et al. Fifteen-year radiotherapy outcomes of the randomized PORTEC-1 trial for endometrial carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2011) 81(4):e631–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.04.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Matei D, Filiaci V, Randall ME, Mutch D, Steinhoff MM, DiSilvestro PA, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiation for locally advanced endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med (2019) 380(24):2317–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813181

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, Katsaros D, Bessette P, Haie-Meder C, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol (2019) 20(9):1273–85. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30395-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kurra V, Krajewski KM, Jagannathan J, Giardino A, Berlin S, Ramaiya N. Typical and atypical metastatic sites of recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Imaging (2013) 13(1):113–22. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Narasimhulu DM, Khulpateea N, Meritz K, Xu Y. Brain metastasis in two patients with stage IA papillary serous carcinoma of the uterus. Gynecol Oncol Rep (2015) 13:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2015.04.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Capozzi VA, Rosati A, Maglietta G, Vargiu V, Scarpelli E, Cosentino F, et al. Long-term survival outcomes in high-risk endometrial cancer patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy alone versus lymphadenectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer (2023) 33(7):1013–20. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004314

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Foote RL, Schray MF, Wilson TO, Malkasian GD Jr. Isolated peripheral lymph node recurrence of endometrial carcinoma. Cancer (1988) 61(12):2561–5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880615)61:12<2561::AID-CNCR2820611229>3.0.CO;2-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Rouviere H. Anatomie des lymphatiques de l’homme. J Am Med Assoc (1932) 99(20):1716–. doi: 10.1001/jama.1932.02740720070042

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Einstein MH, Frimer M, Kuo DY, Reimers LL, Mehta K, Mutyala S, et al. Phase II trial of adjuvant pelvic radiation “sandwiched” between combination paclitaxel and carboplatin in women with uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol (2012) 124(1):21–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.10.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Einstein MH, Klobocista M, Hou JY, Lee S, Mutyala S, Mehta K, et al. Phase II trial of adjuvant pelvic radiation “sandwiched” between ifosfamide or ifosfamide plus cisplatin in women with uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol (2012) 124(1):26–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.10.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, Katsaros D, Bessette P, Haie-Meder C, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol (2018) 19(3):295–309. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30079-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Randall ME, Filiaci V, McMeekin DS, von Gruenigen V, Huang H, Yashar CM, et al. Phase III trial: adjuvant pelvic radiation therapy versus vaginal brachytherapy plus paclitaxel/carboplatin in high-intermediate and high-risk early stage endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol (2019) 37(21):1810–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01575

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Makker V, Colombo N, Casado Herraez A, Santin AD, Colomba E, Miller DS, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for advanced endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med (2022) 386(5):437–48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108330

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Makker V, Colombo N, Herraez AC, Monk BJ, Mackay H, Santin AD, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced endometrial cancer: updated efficacy and safety from the randomized phase III study 309/KEYNOTE-775. J Clin Oncol (2023) 41(16):2904–10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Mirza MR, Chase DM, Slomovitz BM, dePont Christensen R, Novak Z, Black D, et al. Dostarlimab for primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med (2023) 388(23):2145–58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2216334

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Eskander RN, Sill MW, Beffa L, Moore RG, Hope JM, Musa FB, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med (2023) 388(23):2159–70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Pavone M, Spiridon IA, Lecointre L, Seeliger B, Scambia G, Venkatasamy A, et al. Full-field optical coherence tomography imaging for intraoperative microscopic extemporaneous lymph node assessment. Int J Gynecol Cancer (2023) 33(12):1985–7. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar