Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Oncol., 21 August 2023
Sec. Molecular and Cellular Oncology
This article is part of the Research Topic The Tumor Microenvironment and Malignant Properties in Primary Liver Cancer View all 5 articles

Editorial: The tumor microenvironment and malignant properties in primary liver cancer

  • Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

Primary liver cancer, predominantly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, characterized by its insidious development and poor prognosis. Over the years, it’s become apparent that a deeper understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is crucial in decoding the pathophysiology of primary liver cancer and developing innovative therapies (1).

The TME is a complex mosaic of cancer cells, fibroblasts, immune cells, blood vessels, and extracellular matrix. It plays an influential role in malignant progression (2). It’s not just an inert bystander, but an active contributor in shaping cancer’s behavior, including primary liver cancer. Among the vital players in the TME, Immune cells have shown significant impact and therapeutic implications (3). Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) significantly contribute to immunosuppression in HCC, impeding the body’s anti-tumor responses. The manipulation of the immune component of the TME, as exemplified by the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors, heralds a promising avenue for targeted therapies. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are another central element of the TME (4). Acting as master regulators, they influence other components of the TME through the secretion of growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular matrix proteins, fostering an environment conducive to tumor growth. Their role in promoting angiogenesis, immune evasion, and metastasis emphasizes the necessity for a comprehensive understanding of CAFs in devising therapeutic strategies against primary liver cancer.

Despite the advancements in our understanding of the TME, a critical challenge is the heterogeneity within and between tumors. The dynamic interplay of cellular and non-cellular elements in the TME creates a multifaceted network, variable between patients and even within the same tumor. This complexity necessitates the development of personalized strategies for TME targeting. The advent of single-cell technologies has revolutionized our capacity to deconvolute this heterogeneity. By dissecting the TME at an unprecedented resolution, these technologies could provide novel insights into the pathogenesis of primary liver cancer and help identify potential therapeutic targets.

While the importance of the TME in primary liver cancer is widely accepted, our knowledge remains limited, and existing therapies have yet to fully exploit this potential. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, though showing promise, have only benefited a subset of patients. This calls for a more holistic approach, integrating knowledge from genomics, immunology, and cell biology to delineate the TME’s intricacies in liver cancer. Additionally, there is a growing need for developing robust preclinical models that accurately recapitulate the liver TME. While organoids and patient-derived xenografts represent significant strides, they fail to fully capture the complexity of the in vivo environment. Efforts towards refining these models and developing more physiologically relevant ones could revolutionize our ability to predict therapeutic responses and test novel drugs. Moreover, clinical trials should be designed to specifically interrogate the TME’s impact on therapeutic efficacy, biomarker development and incorporation into trial designs could enable stratification of patients most likely to benefit from TME-targeted therapies.

In this Research Topic, several works discussed the association between tumor microenvironment and malignant properties in primary liver cancer. Wang et al. discussed the differences between radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation in inducing the immune regulation of NK cells for HBV-associated primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Isowa et al. reported that the addition of alkalization therapy may improve the efficacy of standard therapies in HCC patients. Liu et al. reported that KIF5A might serve as a potential biomarker for predicting immunotherapy response and could be a potential target for HCC. In addition, Liu et al. reviewed the cellular crosstalk in HCC TME. The four papers that comprise this Research Topic may help to understand the association between tumor microenvironment and malignant properties in primary liver cancer.

In conclusion, the TME is a critical determinant of malignant progression in primary liver cancer, underscoring the need for a concentrated research effort and a shift towards TME-centric therapeutic strategies. Leveraging novel technologies, developing physiologically relevant preclinical models, and designing innovative clinical trials hold the key to unlocking the potential of TME-targeted therapies in improving the prognosis of liver cancer patients. We must seize this opportunity to turn our increasing understanding of the TME into tangible benefits for patients battling this devastating disease.

Author contributions

CQ: Writing – original draft.

Funding

Research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82273154) and Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2023A1515012541).

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Qu C, He L, Yao N, Li J, Jiang Y, Li B, et al. Myofibroblast-specific msi2 knockout inhibits HCC progression in a mouse model. Hepatol (2021) 74(1):458–73. doi: 10.1002/hep.31754

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. de Visser KE, Joyce JA. The evolving tumor microenvironment: From cancer initiation to metastatic outgrowth. Cancer Cell (2023) 41(3):374–403. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lurje I, Werner W, Mohr R, Roderburg C, Tacke F, Hammerich L. In situ vaccination as a strategy to modulate the immune microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Immunol (2021) 12:650486. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.650486

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Affo S, Yu LX, Schwabe RF. The role of cancer-associated fibroblasts and fibrosis in liver cancer. Annu Rev Pathol (2017) 12:153–86. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-052016-100322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: tumor microenvironment, liver cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, immunotherapy, prognosis

Citation: Qu C (2023) Editorial: The tumor microenvironment and malignant properties in primary liver cancer. Front. Oncol. 13:1264439. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1264439

Received: 20 July 2023; Accepted: 28 July 2023;
Published: 21 August 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Tao Liu, University of New South Wales, Australia

Copyright © 2023 Qu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Chen Qu, chenqu@jnu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.