94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Gueliz Acker1,2,3*
Marcel Nachbar3Nina Soffried3Bohdan Bodnar3Anastasia Janas1Kiril Krantchev1Goda Kalinauskaite3Anne Kluge3David Shultz4Alfredo Conti5David Kaul3,6Daniel Zips3Peter Vajkoczy1Carolin Senger3- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
- 2Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Academy, Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
- 4Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 5Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 6German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
A Corrigendum on
What if: a retrospective reconstruction of resection cavity stereotactic radiosurgery to mimic neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery
By Acker G, Nachbar M, Soffried N, Bodnar B, Janas A, Krantchev K, Kalinauskaite G, Kluge A, Shultz D, Conti A, Kaul D, Zips D, Vajkoczy P and Senger C (2023). Front. Oncol. 13:1056330. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1056330
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 6 as published.
FIGURE 6
Figure 6 Graphical representation for the seven simulated plannings, visualizing the dose-defined dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameter ratio between simulated NaSRS and postoperative original irradiation (pre/post) against the absolute difference in GTV volume. Fractionations are color coded: Single fraction in green, 3-fractions in blue, and 5-fractions in red. GTV, gross tumor volume.
We accidentally uploaded the wrong graphic during the production process after the proofing phase as we were trying to improve the resolution of the graphic. However, the legend and caption, as well as in the text explanations of the graph are based on the correct graph and the article was also reviewed and accepted with the correct graph.
The corrected Figure 6 and its caption appear below.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: neoadjuvant, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), CyberKnife®, brain metastases (BM), preoperative
Citation: Acker G, Nachbar M, Soffried N, Bodnar B, Janas A, Krantchev K, Kalinauskaite G, Kluge A, Shultz D, Conti A, Kaul D, Zips D, Vajkoczy P and Senger C (2023) Corrigendum: What if: a retrospective reconstruction of resection cavity stereotactic radiosurgery to mimic neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery. Front. Oncol. 13:1213759. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1213759
Received: 28 April 2023; Accepted: 05 July 2023;
Published: 08 August 2023.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Timothy James Kinsella, Brown University, United StatesCopyright © 2023 Acker, Nachbar, Soffried, Bodnar, Janas, Krantchev, Kalinauskaite, Kluge, Shultz, Conti, Kaul, Zips, Vajkoczy and Senger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gueliz Acker, Z3VlbGl6LmFja2VyQGNoYXJpdGUuZGU=