AUTHOR=Krauze Andra Valentina , Sierk Michael , Nguyen Trinh , Chen Qingrong , Yan Chunhua , Hu Ying , Jiang William , Tasci Erdal , Zgela Theresa Cooley , Sproull Mary , Mackey Megan , Shankavaram Uma , Meerzaman Daoud , Camphausen Kevin TITLE=Glioblastoma survival is associated with distinct proteomic alteration signatures post chemoirradiation in a large-scale proteomic panel JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oncology VOLUME=13 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1127645 DOI=10.3389/fonc.2023.1127645 ISSN=2234-943X ABSTRACT=Background

Glioblastomas (GBM) are rapidly progressive, nearly uniformly fatal brain tumors. Proteomic analysis represents an opportunity for noninvasive GBM classification and biological understanding of treatment response.

Purpose

We analyzed differential proteomic expression pre vs. post completion of concurrent chemoirradiation (CRT) in patient serum samples to explore proteomic alterations and classify GBM by integrating clinical and proteomic parameters.

Materials and methods

82 patients with GBM were clinically annotated and serum samples obtained pre- and post-CRT. Serum samples were then screened using the aptamer-based SOMAScan® proteomic assay. Significant traits from uni- and multivariate Cox models for overall survival (OS) were designated independent prognostic factors and principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out. Differential expression of protein signals was calculated using paired t-tests, with KOBAS used to identify associated KEGG pathways. GSEA pre-ranked analysis was employed on the overall list of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) against the MSigDB Hallmark, GO Biological Process, and Reactome databases with weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) and Enrichr used to validate pathway hits internally.

Results

3 clinical clusters of patients with differential survival were identified. 458 significantly DEPs pre- vs. post-treatment, 316 upregulated, 142 downregulated emerged including several pathways relevant to cancer metabolism and progression. The worst survival group (median OS 13.2 months) was associated with DEPs affiliated with proliferative pathways and distinct oppositional response (including RT) as compared to better-performing groups (intermediate, median OS 22.4 months; highest, median OS 28.7 months). Opposite signaling patterns across multiple analyses in several pathways (notably fatty acid metabolism, TNFα via NF-κB, Myc target V1 signaling, UV response, unfolded protein response, peroxisome, and interferon response) were distinct between clinical survival groups and supported by WGCNA. 9 proteins were statistically signficant for OS with 1 (CEACAM16) supported by KM.

Conclusion

Distinct proteomic alterations with hallmarks of cancer, including progression, resistance, stemness, and invasion, were identified in serum samples obtained from GBM patients pre vs. post CRT and corresponded with clinical survival. The proteome can potentially be employed for glioma classification and biological interrogation of cancer pathways.