AUTHOR=Ohsawa Manato , Hamai Yoichi , Emi Manabu , Ibuki Yuta , Kurokawa Tomoaki , Yoshikawa Toru , Hirohata Ryosuke , Kitasaki Nao , Okada Morihito TITLE=Real-world clinical outcomes of nivolumab and taxane as a second- or later-line therapy for recurrent or unresectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oncology VOLUME=13 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1126536 DOI=10.3389/fonc.2023.1126536 ISSN=2234-943X ABSTRACT=Background

Nivolumab is approved in Japan as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) resistant to fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based drugs. It is also used in adjuvant and primary postoperative therapies. This study aimed to report real-world data on nivolumab use for esophageal cancer treatment.

Methods

In total, 171 patients with recurrent or unresectable advanced ESCC who received nivolumab (n = 61) or taxane (n = 110) were included. We collected real-world data of patients treated with nivolumab as a second- or later-line therapy and evaluated treatment outcomes and safety.

Results

Median overall survival was longer and progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer (p = 0.0172) in patients who received nivolumab than in patients who received taxane as a second- or later-line therapy. Furthermore, subgroup analysis for second-line treatment only showed the superiority of nivolumab in increasing the PFS rate (p = 0.0056). No serious adverse events were observed.

Conclusions

In real-world practice, nivolumab was safer and more effective than taxane in patients with ESCC with diverse clinical profiles who did not meet trial eligibility criteria, including those with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, comorbidities, and receiving multiple treatments.