AUTHOR=Xiong Situ , Jiang Ming , Jiang Yi , Hu Bing , Chen Ru , Yao Zhijun , Deng Wen , Wan Xianwen , Liu Xiaoqiang , Chen Luyao , Fu Bin 

TITLE=Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oncology

VOLUME=12

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.916018

DOI=10.3389/fonc.2022.916018

ISSN=2234-943X

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Purpose</title><p>The study aimed to compare operative, functional, and oncological outcomes between partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for entophytic renal tumors (ERTs) by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>A total of 228 patients with ERTs who underwent PN or RN between August 2014 and December 2021 were assessed. A PSM in a 1:1 ratio was conducted to balance the differences between groups. Perioperative characteristics, renal functional, and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of functional and survival outcomes.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>After PSM, 136 cases were matched to the PN group (n = 68) and the RN group (n = 68). Patients who underwent RN had shorter OT, less EBL, and lower high-grade complications (all <italic>p</italic> &lt;0.05) relative to those who underwent PN. However, better perseveration of renal function was observed in the PN group, which was reflected in 48-h postoperative AKI (44.1% vs. 70.6%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.002), 1-year postoperative 90% eGFR preservation (45.6% vs. 22.1%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.004), and new-onset CKD Stage ≥III at last follow-up (2.9% vs. 29.4%, <italic>p</italic> &lt;0.001). RN was the independent factor of short-term (OR, 2.812; 95% CI, 1.369–5.778; <italic>p</italic> = 0.005) and long-term renal function decline (OR, 10.242; 95% CI, 2.175–48.240; <italic>p</italic> = 0.003). Furthermore, PN resulted in a better OS and similar PFS and CSS as compared to RN (<italic>p</italic> = 0.042, 0.15, and 0.21, respectively). RN (OR, 7.361; 95% CI, 1.143–47.423; <italic>p</italic> = 0.036) and pT3 stage (OR, 4.241; 95% CI, 1.079–16.664; <italic>p</italic> = 0.039) were independent predictors of overall mortality.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Among patients with ERTs, although the PN group showed a higher incidence of high-grade complications than RN, when technically feasible and with experienced surgeons, PN is recommended for better preservation of renal function, longer OS, and similar oncological outcomes.</p></sec>