AUTHOR=Cai Jing-Sheng , Qiu Man-Tang , Yang Fan , Wang Xun TITLE=Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer among young individuals: Incidence, presentations, and survival outcomes of conventional therapies JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oncology VOLUME=12 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.894780 DOI=10.3389/fonc.2022.894780 ISSN=2234-943X ABSTRACT=Background

There is a paucity of data published on the clinicopathological features and prognosis of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients aged ≤45 years. Herein, we evaluated a large clinical series in an effort to provide a clearer picture of this population.

Methods

The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-penalized Cox regression model was performed to identify prognostic factors for NSCLC among individuals aged ≤45 years. The Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test was used to compare overall survival (OS) differences between groups. Competing risk analysis with the Fine–Gray test was used to analyze cancer-specific survival (CSS) differences. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias.

Results

Incidence-rate analyses, including 588,680 NSCLC cases (stage IV, 233,881; age ≤ 45 years stage IV, 5,483; and age > 45 years stage IV, 228,398) from 2004 to 2015, showed that the incidence of stage IV NSCLC among young individuals decreased over the years. In comparative analyses of clinical features and survival outcomes, a total of 48,607 eligible stage IV cases (age ≤ 45 years stage IV, 1,390; age > 45 years stage IV, 47,217) were included. The results showed that although patients in the young cohort were more likely to be diagnosed at advanced stages, they were also more likely to receive aggressive treatments. In addition, the survival rates of the young patients were superior to those of the older patients both before and after PSM.

Conclusions

Stage IV NSCLC patients aged ≤45 years comprise a relatively small but special NSCLC subgroup. Although this population had better survival outcomes than older patients, these patients deserve more attention due to their young age and the significant socioeconomic implications.