AUTHOR=Wu Liangcai , Shi Shuo , Sun Hong , Zhang Haiyan TITLE=Tumor Size Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Stage I Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study of 1,000 Patients JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oncology VOLUME=12 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.862944 DOI=10.3389/fonc.2022.862944 ISSN=2234-943X ABSTRACT=Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value and stratification cutoff point for tumor size in stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC).

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (version: SEER 8.3.9). Patients diagnosed with stage I OCCC from 1988 to 2018 were included for further analysis. X-Tile software was used to identify the potential cutoff point for tumor size. Stratification analysis, propensity score matching, and inverse probability weighting analysis were used to balance the potential confounding factors.

Results

A total of 1,000 stage I OCCC patients were included. Of these 1,000 patients, median follow-up was 106 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89–112 months). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, age at diagnosis, and stage IC were significantly associated with stage I OCCC patients. Eight centimeters is a promising cutoff point that can divide stage I OCCC patients into a good or a poor prognosis group. After controlling potential confounding factors with propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting, we demonstrated that stage I OCCC patients with tumor size ≤ 8 cm enjoyed a significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS, 89.8% vs. 81%, p < 0.0001). Tumor size ≤ 8 cm was an independent prognostic factor of stage I OCCC patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.5608, 95% CI: 0.4126–0.7622, p = 0.0002).

Conclusions

Tumor size is an independent prognostic factor for stage I OCCC, and 8 cm is a promising cutoff point for tumor size for risk stratification. However, using tumor size in the stratification management of stage I OCCC patients warrants further investigation.