AUTHOR=Wan Qingyun , Luo Shuting , Wang Xiaoqiu , Tian Qianmo , Xi Hanqing , Zheng Shiyu , Fang Qinqin , Chen Hao , Wu Wenzhong , Pan Rui 

TITLE=Association of Acupuncture and Auricular Acupressure With the Improvement of Sleep Disturbances in Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oncology

VOLUME=12

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.856093

DOI=10.3389/fonc.2022.856093

ISSN=2234-943X

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Background</title><p>Studies on the efficacy of acupuncture and auricular acupressure on sleep disturbances in cancer patients have been growing, but there is no specific and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture and auricular acupressure on sleep disturbances in cancer survivors based on existing randomized clinical trials (RCTs).</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>Four English-language and four Chinese-language biomedical databases were searched for RCTs published from database inception to July 30, 2021. RCTs comparing acupuncture and auricular acupressure with sham control, drug therapy, behavior therapy, or usual care for managing cancer were included. The quality of RCTs was appraised with the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias (ROB) tool. Mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the effect sizes.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Thirteen RCTs with 961 patients were included. The risk of performance bias or reporting bias for most of the included trials was high or unclear. Evidence was not found for short-term effects on sleep scales compared to sham control (MD, 1.98; 95% CI, 0.33–3.64; <italic>p</italic> = 0.02; <italic>I<sup>2</sup></italic> = 36%), wait list control (MD, 0.40; 95% CI, −0.87–1.68; <italic>p</italic> = 0.54; <italic>I<sup>2</sup></italic> = 49%), drug therapy (MD, 1.18; 95% CI, −3.09–5.46; <italic>p</italic> = 0.59; <italic>I<sup>2</sup></italic> = 98%). For long-term effect, two sham-controlled RCTs showed no significance of acupuncture on insomnia scale scores (MD, 1.71; 95% CI, −2.38–5.81; <italic>p</italic> = 0.41; <italic>I<sup>2</sup></italic> = 89%). Subgroup analyses suggested no evidence that auricular acupressure (MD, 3.14; 95% CI=1.52, 4.76; <italic>p</italic> = 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) or acupuncture (MD, 0.54; 95% CI=−1.27, 2.34; <italic>p</italic> = 0.56; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) was associated with the reduction in insomnia scale scores.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis found no evidence about acupuncture or auricular acupressure in the improvement of sleep disturbances in cancer survivors in terms of short- or long-term effect. Adverse events were minor. The finding was inconsistent with previous research and suggested that more well-designed and large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to identify the efficacy of acupuncture and auricular acupressure for sleep disturbances in cancer survivors.</p></sec><sec><title>Systematic Review Registration</title><p><uri xlink:href="https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/</uri>, CRD42020171612.</p></sec>