AUTHOR=Lu Yongkai , Yang Di , Zhang Xiaowei , Teng Yonggang , Yuan Wei , Zhang Yuemei , He Ruixin , Tang Fengwen , Pang Jie , Han Bo , Chen Ruijuan , Li Yi 

TITLE=Comparison of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Versus Free Breathing in Radiotherapy for Left Sided Breast Cancer

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oncology

VOLUME=12

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.845037

DOI=10.3389/fonc.2022.845037

ISSN=2234-943X

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Objectives</title><p>Modern breast cancer techniques, such as the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique has been applied for left-sided breast cancer. Whether the DIBH regimen is the optimal solution for left-sided breast cancer remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to elucidate the differences of DIBH and free-breathing (FB) for patients receiving radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer and provide a practical reference for clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>Relevant research available on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science published before November 30, 2021 was independently and systematically examined by two investigators. Data were extracted from eligible studies for assessing their qualities and calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Review Manager software 5.4 (RevMan 5.4).</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Forty-one studies with a total of 3599 left-sided breast cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with FB, DIBH reduced heart dose (<italic>D</italic><sub>mean</sub>, <italic>D</italic><sub>max</sub>, V30, V10, V5), left anterior descending branch (LAD) dose (<italic>D</italic><sub>mean</sub>, <italic>D</italic><sub>max</sub>), ipsilateral lung dose (<italic>D</italic><sub>mean</sub>, V20, V10, V5), and heart volume significantly. Lung volume increased greatly, and a statistically significant difference. For contralateral breast mean dose, DIBH has no obvious advantage over FB. The funnel plot suggested this study has no significant publication bias.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Although DIBH has no obvious advantage over FB in contralateral breast mean dose, it can significantly reduce heart dose, LAD dose, ipsilateral lung dose, and heart volume. Conversely, it can remarkably increase the ipsilateral lung volume. This study suggests that soon DIBH could be more widely utilized in clinical practice because of its excellent dosimetric performance.</p></sec>