AUTHOR=Wu Kaijie , Jiang Dali , Zhang Lianhua , Jiang Shuai , Lin Tianhai , Luo Yi , Fan Jinhai , Yang Tao , Chen Haige , Zhang Peng , Wang Xinghuan , Wei Qiang , Guo Jianming , Huang Yiran , He Dalin TITLE=Efficacy and safety of a novel 450 nm blue diode laser versus plasmakinetic electrocautery for the transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: The protocol and result of a multicenter randomized controlled trial JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oncology VOLUME=12 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.1065735 DOI=10.3389/fonc.2022.1065735 ISSN=2234-943X ABSTRACT=Objectives

To be the first to apply a novel 450 nm blue diode laser in transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBt) to treat patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and evaluate its efficacy and safety during the preoperative period compared to the conventional plasmakinetic electrocautery.

Materials and Methods

Randomized controlled trial (RCT) in five medical centers was designed as a non-inferiority study and conducted from October 2018 to December 2019. Patients with NMIBC were randomized to the blue laser or plasmakinetic electrocautery group for TURBt. As the first study to evaluate this novel blue laser device, the primary outcome was the effective resection rate of bladder tumors, including effective dissection and hemostasis. The secondary outcomes were the perioperative records, including surgical time, postoperative indwelling catheter time, hospital stay length, blood loss, reoperation rate, wound healing and adverse events.

Results

A total of 174 patients were randomized to either the blue laser group (85 patients) or plasmakinetic electrocautery group (89 patients). There was no statistical significance in the clinical features of bladder tumors, including tumor site, number and maximum lesion size. Both the blue laser and plasmakinetic electrocautery could effectively dissect all visible bladder tumors. The surgical time for patients in the blue laser group was longer (p=0.001), but their blood loss was less than that of patients in the control group (p=0.003). There were no differences in the postoperative indwelling catheter time, hospital stay length, reoperation rate or other adverse events. However, the patients undergoing TURBt with the blue laser showed a faster wound healing at 3 months after operation.

Conclusion

The novel blue laser could be effectively and safely used for TURBt in patients with NMIBC, and this method was not inferior to plasmakinetic electrocautery during the perioperative period. However, TURBt with the blue laser may provide the benefit to reduce preoperative blood loss and accelerate postoperative wound healing. Moreover, longer follow-up to confirm recurrence-free survival benefit was required.