- 1Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- 3Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pole of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Brussels, Belgium
Editorial on the Research Topic
The effect of anti-cancer drug therapies in the treatment of lung cancer
Lung cancer is still the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide (1). Patients with lung cancer feature poor clinical outcomes primarily due to the challenges of early detection, high risk of metastasis and the development of resistance to multiple therapies. Thus, a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms supporting therapy escape is essential to improve the survival rate and prognosis of this disease. Currently, international guidelines have established a minimum panel of so-called “must test genes”, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) and V-Raf Murine Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B (BRAF) mutations, Anaplastic Lymphoma Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (ALK), ROS Proto-Oncogene 1, Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (ROS1), Rearranged During Transfection (RET), Neurotrophic Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (NTRK) gene rearrangements and MET Proto-Oncogene, Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (MET) exon 14 skipping, for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) administration and the evaluation of the expression level of Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), for immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) administration, in order to avoid to leave any non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient behind (2). Beyond well-established biomarkers, others are being currently under investigation as potentially actionable genomic alterations. (Zhou et al.; Zhai et al.)
Overall, in this Special Topic of Frontiers in Oncology and Frontiers in Pharmacology, we attempt to address some major concerns related to targeted therapies and ICIs administration, novel therapeutic strategies, resistance mechanisms and adverse events in lung cancer patients.
The results of FLAURA clinical trial have clearly demonstrated the superiority in terms of clinical benefit of first-line osimertinib respect to other EGFR TKIs in untreated advanced stage NSCLC patients harboring common (exon 19 deletions or exon 21 p.L858R) EGFR mutations (3, 4). However, little was known about the efficacy of this drug on uncommon EGFR mutant patients. In this setting, Zhi et al., in a case report experience, highlighted that the combination of osimertinib plus bevacizumab may represent a valid therapeutic option after osimertinib in advanced stage NSCLC patients harboring EGFR exon 20 p.D770_N771insGT mutation and brain metastasis.The combination of osimertinib plus bevacizumab has also demonstrated a higher clinical efficacy respect to chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in advanced stage NSCLC EGFR-mutant patients after the failure of osimertinib alone administration (Cui et al.). In addition, osimertinib seemed to be safe and feasible also in neoadjuvant setting in resectable NSCLC EGFR-mutant patients (Hu et al.). A crucial point in the management of advanced stage NSCLC patients by EGFR TKIs is represented by the possibility to act on brain metastasis. As for osimertinib, almonertinib, a novel third generation EGFR TKI, showed in preclinical models the capacity to easily penetrate the blood-brain barrier and the ability to act on brain and spinal cord metastases (Zhang et al.). Beyond EGFR-mutant patients, careful attention should be paid on gene rearrangements. In this setting, Peng et al. highlighted, in a Bayesian network meta-analysis, that lorlatinib is associated with the highest progression-free survival (PFS) and lowest risk of brain progression in advanced stage NSCLC ALK-fused patients respect to other ALK TKIs. However, a significant higher toxicity was also registered. Regarding small cell lung cancer and other rare large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinomas, encouraging results have been reported with the adoption of the novel multi-targeting TKI anlotinib (Gan et al.; Xu et al.). Regarding ICIs administration, beyond the established role of expression level of PD-L1, other biomarkers are being under investigation. Among these, Fu et al. showed the benefit of ICI administration in an advanced stage NSCLC patients with DNA Polymerase Epsilon, Catalytic Subunit (POLE) mutation and brain metastasis.
The role of POLE2 was also highlighted in the study by Ni et al. In this work, the authors showed that berberine, a natural anti-cancer drug, may inhibit in vitro and in vivo lung adenocarcinoma progression due to the down-regulation of Forkhead Box M1 (FOXM1)/POLE2 expression as emerged.Among the novel therapeutic strategies, several other molecules are being currently under investigation and are showing promising pre-clinical results. (Pan et al.; Wang et al.; Wu et al; Yan et al.; Ye et al.; Yin et al.; Zhang et al.; Zhao et al.; Zhao et al.). As far as chemotherapy is concerned, Tu et al. showed that the inhibition of hedgehog signaling may a be a promising strategy to improve paclitaxel response in advanced stage NSCLC EGFR wild type patients.
Another crucial point in lung cancer treatment is represented by the development of resistance. In this scenario, several mechanisms may arise. In the case report by Liu et al., a patient harboring an EGFR exon 21 p.L858R point mutation developed a Lysocardiolipin Acyltransferase 1 (LCLAT1)/ALK rearrangement after icotinib administration and an additional EGFR exon 20 p.T790M after the subsequent ensartinib administration. Thus, in those patients an association of osimertinib plus ensartinib has been considered to overcome the double resistance mechanisms.Considering gene rearrangements, MET amplification has been identified as a resistance mechanism to crizotinib administration in advanced stage NSCLC ROS1-fused patients by Yang et al.
Finally, the role of adverse events to chemotherapy and targeted therapies, including TKIs and ICIs, should be taken into account. Regarding antimetabolites, Geier et al. described the development of a severe acrosyndrome. The authors suggested awareness for the rise of these events, in particular in patients with predisposing factors. As far as TKI regimen is concerned, a rare and severe fatal tumor lysis syndrome has been showed after brigatinib administration in an advanced NSCLC ALK-fused patients. (Wang et al.). A possible solution to reduce adverse events in afatinib administration has been proposed by Wang et al. The authors in their systematic review and meta-analysis highlighted a significant reduction in adverse events with a dose reduction of the drug. Rare adverse events have been also reported for ICI regimens. In particular, Lin et al. reported a hepatic sarcoid/granulomatous-like reaction after toripalimab (anti PD-1) administration whereas a severe pneumonitis was reported by Xie et al. after pembrolizumab administration. However, in this latter case, the Authors highlighted the role of nintedanib for the treatment of this adverse event (Xie et al.).
Overall, this Research Topic has highlighted the effects, in terms of clinical benefit, resistance mechanisms and adverse events, of different anti-cancer drugs in the treatment of lung cancer. Ongoing research is warranted to improve the clinical outcome of these patients.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
PP has received personal fees as speaker bureau from Novartis, for work performed outside of the current study.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin (2022) 72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708
2. Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, Bharat A, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2022) 20:497–530. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0025
3. Soria JC, Ohe Y, Vansteenkiste J, Reungwetwattana T, Chewaskulyong B, Lee KH, et al. Osimertinib in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-Small-Cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med (2018) 378:113–25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713137
Keywords: lung cancer, NSCLC, molecular, target therapy, biomarker
Citation: Pisapia P, Li Z and Corbet C (2022) Editorial: The effect of anti-cancer drug therapies in the treatment of lung cancer. Front. Oncol. 12:1035245. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1035245
Received: 02 September 2022; Accepted: 13 September 2022;
Published: 19 October 2022.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Olivier Feron, Université catholique de Louvain, BelgiumCopyright © 2022 Pisapia, Li and Corbet. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Pasquale Pisapia, cGFzcXVhbGUucGlzYXBpYUB1bmluYS5pdA==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work