AUTHOR=Zhu Yan , Yuan Wei , Xie Chun-Mei , Xu Wei , Wang Jia-Ping , Feng Li , Wu Hui-Li , Lu Pin-Xiang , Geng Zi-Han , Lv Chuan-Feng , Li Quan-Lin , Hou Ying-Yong , Chen Wei-Feng , Zhou Ping-Hong 

TITLE=Two-step artificial intelligence system for endoscopic gastric biopsy improves the diagnostic accuracy of pathologists

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oncology

VOLUME=Volume 12 - 2022

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.1008537

DOI=10.3389/fonc.2022.1008537

ISSN=2234-943X

ABSTRACT=Background: Endoscopic biopsy is the pivotal procedure for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. In this study, we applied whole-slide images (WSIs) of endoscopic gastric biopsy specimens to develop an endoscopic gastric biopsy assistant system (EGBAS). Methods: The EGBAS was trained using 2373 WSIs expertly annotated and internally validated on 245 WSIs. A large-scale, multicenter test dataset of 2003 WSIs was used to externally evaluate EGBAS. Eight pathologists were compared with the EGBAS using a man-machine comparison test dataset. The fully manual performance of the pathologists was also compared with semi-manual performance using EGBAS assistance. 
Results: The average area under the curve of the EGBAS was 0·979 (0·958-0·990). For the diagnosis of all four categories, the overall accuracy of EGBAS was 86·95%, which was significantly higher than pathologists (P < 0·05). The EGBAS achieved a higher κ score (0·880, very good κ) than junior and senior pathologists (0·641 ± 0·088 and 0·729 ± 0·056). With EGBAS assistance, the overall accuracy (four-tier classification) of the pathologists increased from 66·49 ± 7·73% to 73·83 ± 5·73% (P < 0·05). The length of time for pathologists to manually complete the dataset was 461·44 ± 117·96 minutes; this time was reduced to 305·71 ± 82·43 minutes with EGBAS assistance (P = 0·00). 
Conclusions: The EGBAS is a promising system for improving the diagnosis ability and reducing the workload of pathologists.