Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol., 20 October 2022
Sec. Genitourinary Oncology

The comprehensive complication index is more sensitive than the Clavien–Dindo classification for grading complications in elderly patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: Implementing the European Association of Urology guideline

Haiwen Huang,,&#x;Haiwen Huang1,2,3†Zhenan Zhang,,&#x;Zhenan Zhang1,2,3†Han Hao,,Han Hao1,2,3Haixin WangHaixin Wang4Meixia ShangMeixia Shang5Zhijun Xi,,*Zhijun Xi1,2,3*
  • 1Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 2Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
  • 3Institute of Urology, National Research Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Beijing, China
  • 4Department of Urology, Yankuang New Journey General Hospital, Zoucheng, China
  • 5Department of Medical Statistics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China

Objectives: Lack of assessment of 90-d perioperative morbidity in elderly patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) using a standard reporting methodology, and the Clavien–Dindo classification (CDC) does not accurately reflect the burden of complications. We aim to report the 90-d complications of elderly patients after radical cystectomy, and to compare the validity of the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and CDC.

Methods: Retrospective review of 280 patients aged ≥75 years who received radical cystectomy between 2006 and 2021. The 90-d complications of elderly patients after radical cystectomy were reported by implementing the EAU criteria. The CDC and CCI were both used for grading complications. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to estimate the correlation between postoperative stay and CDC/CCI. Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for major complications. The sample size for a fictive superiority trial was calculated for different endpoints.

Results: A total of 225 (80.36%) patients suffered from 528 complications. The cumulative CCI had a more accurate prediction of postoperative stay than the CDC (r = 0.378, p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.349, p < 0.001). The need for sample size could decrease when CCI was used for the primary endpoint. More risk factors for major complications were identified when CCI ≥33.7 was defined as the endpoint of major complications.

Conclusion: CCI is better than CDC for grading the severity of complications in elderly patients after radical cystectomy and PLND.

Introduction

Radical cystectomy is recommended by evidenced-based guidelines as the gold standard treatment for patients with recurrent high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and local muscle-invasive bladder cancer (1). Because of its severe trauma and high complexity, patients are susceptible to various complications after operations. However, the incidence of complications after radical cystectomy varied widely in different studies (27). An unclear definition of complications and inconsistent reporting criteria account for this difference. The European Association of Urology (EAU) has published a guideline of complication reporting for urological surgical procedures (8), which has been validated in open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (9, 10). Nonetheless, no study has yet assessed the 90-d perioperative morbidity of elderly patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) using a standard reporting methodology.

The Clavien–Dindo classification (CDC) was recommended as a severity grading system for postoperative complications (8). However, only the most serious complication was considered for grading when using CDC (11). Patients after radical cystectomy often suffer from more than one complication, and the main limitation of CDC is the underestimation of the burden of perioperative complications. To estimate the burden of complications more accurately, the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) was proposed by Slankamenac and colleagues (12), which based the complication grading by CDC and considered all complications into a single formula weighted by their severity. The CCI has been validated for open radical cystectomy in a previous study (10, 13). The incidence of bladder cancer increases with age, and most patients are elderly (14). Elderly patients often have more comorbidities, which leads to a higher risk of complications. We hypothesized that the burden of complications would be estimated more accurately when CCI was used.

The aims of the present study are threefold: (1) to assess the 90-d complications of elderly patients after radical cystectomy and PLND based on EAU guideline of complication reporting, (2) to compare CCI with CDC in elderly patients, and (3) to explore the risks of major complications after operations according to CDC and CCI.

Materials and methods

Patient population

Retrospective analysis of data from chart review was performed in this study. We defined the following inclusion criteria: (1) patients who received radical cystectomy with urinary diversion from January 2006 to October 2021 at Peking University First Hospital and (2) patients aged ≥75 years. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) PLND was not performed (n = 130) and (2) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery (n = 4). Finally, a total of 280 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the clinical research ethics committee of Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

Assessment of complications

The collection and grading of complications were completed by two clinical doctors. Defines of complications after radical cystectomy were referred to the catalog of study of Vetterlein, Malte W. et al (10), which employed the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. The 90-d complications after radical cystectomy were collected from digitalized charts, and outpatient information was included. Each complication was graded by using the CDC (11), and the highest grade for each patient was defined as the CDC of the patient. The CCI was calculated for each patient by using the online tool provided at https://www.assessurgery.com. The cumulative CCI and non-cumulative CCI were calculated based on all complications and the highest complication, respectively. The intraoperative complications were reported separately. This study complied with the EAU guideline of complication reporting (Supplementary Table 1).

Clinical characteristics and pathological data

Clinical characteristics, including sex, age, BMI, type of surgical approach, type of urinary diversion, time of operation, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin, estimated blood loss (EBL), and postoperative stay, were collected in this study. The Charlson comorbidity index was used to assess the comorbidity of patients (15). The last recorded preoperative serum creatinine (sCr) values were extracted, and sCr ≥ 1.5 mg/dL was classified as renal insufficiency. Pathological T stage and pathological nodal stage were classified by using the TNM staging system of bladder cancer of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual 8th edition. Furthermore, pathological grade, lymph node yield, and surgical margin status were included in the pathological data.

Statistical analysis

The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to estimate the correlation between variables. Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for major complications for all patients, which included the variables that showed a univariate relationship with major complications or that were considered clinically relevant. The sample size for a fictive superiority trial was calculated when the presence of any CDC complication, the presence of a major CDC complication, or the cumulative CCI were used as the primary endpoints. We assume a 30% relative risk reduction for the incidence of any complication and the incidence of major complications, a difference of 10 points for the cumulative CCI, a power of 80%, and an α-error of 0.05. A difference of 10 points on the cumulative CCI reflects one grade difference of CDC (12). The statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 25 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA), and all p values were two-sided. p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. R (version 3.6.3) was used for visualization of correlation analyses, and Prism 6.0 (GraphPad, Prism®) was used for graphing.

Result

Clinical and pathological characteristics

A total of 280 elderly patients who underwent radical cystectomy and PLND were enrolled in this study. The clinical and pathological characteristics are depicted in Table 1. Among them, 169 (60.4%) patients received open radical cystectomy, 99 (35.4%) patients underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy, and 12 (4.43%) patients received robot-assisted radical cystectomy. The median age of all patients was 78 (76-80) years, and the median postoperative stay was 10 (8-14) days.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 The clinicopathologic characteristics of all patients.

Assessment of complications

A total of 225 (80.36%) patients suffered from complications after operations, and the total number of all postoperative complications was 528. The detailed summary of categories, grading (according to CDC), number and proportion of all types of complications are depicted in Table 2. The three most common complication types were cardiac complications (40.71%), infectious complications (36.43%), and gastrointestinal complications (32.4%). Nine (3.2%) patients received reoperation after radical cystectomy and PLND, and wound dehiscence was the most common cause (Supplementary Table 2). Sixteen (5.7%) patients were unplanned readmitted after the primary operation, and the most frequent complication for readmission was ileus (Supplementary Table 3). No patient died within 90-d after radical cystectomy. While two patients died shortly after the operation (on day 94 and day 104). Four (1.43%) patients experienced intraoperative complications, all of which were rectal injury.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Frequencies, proportions, therapeutic management, and grading of perioperative 90-d complications in patients who underwent radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.

CDC and CCI

The cumulative CCI was calculated for each patient with postoperative complications. Patients with higher grades of CDC had a higher CCI (Supplementary Figure 1A, r = 0.879, p < 0.001). A total of 139 (49.6%) patients developed more than one complication after radical cystectomy and PLND. With increasing CDC grade, patients had a higher number of complications (Supplementary Figure 1B). With an increasing grade of CDC, more patients had a higher cumulative CCI compared with the non-cumulative CCI, which only considered the most severe complication (Figure 1). The above results indicate that the cumulative CCI was more representative of elderly patients’ burden of postoperative complications.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Non-cumulative CCI and cumulative CCI of patients with complications. CCI = Comprehensive Complication Index.

The correlations of postoperative stay with cumulative CCI and CDC were analyzed (Figure 2). The cumulative CCI, taking into account all complications, had a more accurate prediction of postoperative stay than the CDC, considering only the most severe complications (r = 0.378, p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.349, p < 0.001).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 (A): Correlation between CDC and postoperative stay (r = 0.349, p < 0.001). (B): Correlation between CCI and postoperative stay (r = 0.378, p < 0.001). CDC, Clavien–Dindo classification, CCI, Comprehensive Complication Index. The correlations between variables were analyzed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient.

In order to compared sensitivity of CCI and CDC to identify the difference of postoperative morbidity caused by treatment. The sample sizes were calculated when the presence of any CDC complication, presence of major CDC complication, and cumulative CCI were used for the primary endpoint. The assumptions for the fictive superiority trial are depicted in Table 3, and the need for sample size could significantly decrease when cumulative CCI was used for the primary endpoint.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 Sample size calculation for surgical RCTs using different measurements.

Risk factors for major complications

When CDC grade ≥IIIb was defined as the endpoint of major complications, Charlson comorbidity index ≥3 (OR = 6.34 [1.93-20.76], p = 0.002) and higher ΔHb (OR = 1.06 [1.01-1.10], p = 0.017) were identified as risk factors for major complications in elderly patients after radical cystectomy. While not only Charlson comorbidity index ≥3 (OR = 2.86 [1.19-6.86], p = 0.019) and higher ΔHb (OR = 1.06 [1.03-1.09], p <0.001) but also preoperative renal insufficiency (OR = 2.59 [1.02-6.62], p = 0.046) and higher time of operation (OR = 1.01 [1.00-1.01], p = 0.040) were associated with major complications, when the endpoint of that was referred to CCI ≥33.7 (Table 4).

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4 Logistic regression analysis of variables associated with major complication for all patients.

Discussion

In the present study, we assessed the 90-d complications of elderly patients after radical cystectomy and PLND by implementing the EAU guideline for reporting complications. The CDC and CCI were used and compared as the severity grading system for postoperative complications. Compared with CDC, cumulative CCI could represent the burden of complications more sensitively and presented stronger correlation with postoperative stay. When cumulative CCI was applied as the primary endpoint for a fictive superiority trial, the need for sample size would decrease. Furthermore, more risk factors for major complications were identified when CCI ≥33.7 was defined as the endpoint of major complications.

Previous studies have shown that there is large variation in reporting postoperative complications after radical cystectomy (27, 10), which is caused by the interobserver variability in defining and grading complications (16). Implementation of the EAU guidelines on reporting complications contributed to improving the accuracy and reliability of reporting and grading complications (9, 10). In our study, most patients (80.36%) suffered from at least one complication after radical cystectomy, which was higher than the majority of other studies (25). Standardized criteria could improve the quality of complication reporting and allow comparison of different treatment. Furthermore, through rigorous evaluation of clinical data, a greater number of complications would be detected, especially grade 1 and 2 complications (according to CDC). We found a total of 528 postoperative complications in our cohort, and almost half of the patients experienced more than one complication. Evaluation of the burden of complications based on CDC, which only considers the most severe complication, would be underestimated. We also found that 83 (29.6%) patients had an elevated CCI corresponding to CDC. The CCI was superior to the CDC when estimating the burden of morbidity after surgery, which has also been validated in other surgeries, such as gastric cancer surgery (17) and pancreatectomy (18).

In this study, we found that CCI exhibited a stronger correlation with postoperative stays than CDC, which was the same as previous studies of open radical cystectomy (13) and gastric cancer surgery (17). These results proved that the CCI grading system can be mirrored by the perioperative outcomes of patients more accurately. However, in the literature, for radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy (13) and endourological stone surgery (19), there was no superiority of the correlation between CCI and postoperative stay compared with CDC. The low incidence of complications (29.3% to 41.2%) and short hospital stay of these surgeries could explain this result of no superiority (13, 19). Nevertheless, the postoperative stay should not be the only parameter representing the perioperative outcomes. Further studies are encouraged to evaluate the correlations of grading systems of complications between objective and subjective perioperative characteristics, such as treatment cost, treatment satisfaction of patients and patients’ outcomes.

Slankamenac K. et al. first proved that the requirement of sample size was lower for CCI than traditional endpoints for the superiority trial on morbidity endpoints (20). In the present study, we also evaluated the sample size for a fictive superiority trial when different events were used as endpoints. The CCI could significantly reduce the need for sample size, especially compared with the presence of major CDC complications. This suggests that the use of CCI as the primary endpoint in future superiority trials could increase the feasibility and decrease the cost of the clinical trial.

When CCI ≥33.7 was defined as the endpoint of major complications, more risk factors were identified in the present study. To the best of our knowledge, there was no study reporting this superiority of sensitivity for exploring risk factors before. Preoperative renal insufficiency and time of operation were covered up when using conventional definition of major complications because of the small number of endpoint events and little effect on the endpoint, which may be prominent when there was a larger sample size. In another study with a larger sample size, preoperative renal insufficiency was indeed identified to be associated with major complications (21). The complications and management of patients with preoperative renal insufficiency are depicted in Supplementary Table 4. There were 31 patients with preoperative renal insufficiency, and 25 (80.6%) patients suffered from postoperative complications. The number of complications per patient for patients with preoperative renal insufficiency was 2.52, which was higher than that for patients with normal renal function. A greater number of complications could explain the upgrade of the CCI score.

Several limitations should be considered in this study. First, the retrospective design would cause information loss because of recall bias. It was definitely underestimated for postoperative complications, although we report a relative high morbidity of complications. Second, for intraoperative complications, only rectal injury was recorded in the case data, the fact and detail of that were not able to report. Moreover, the CDC could not apply to intraoperative complications, and further study should assess the intraoperative complications by using a grading system for urological surgery, such as the “Intraoperative Adverse Incident Classification” (22). Third, PLND is the main part of the surgery procedure, which could increase the time of operation (23) and was strongly associated with postoperative complications. From a statistical perspective, it was not feasible to enrolled patients received different surgical procedures. Thus, elderly patients who did not receive PLDN were excluded. Finally, the rate of complication would be overestimated, because some adverse events would happen even without attack of radical cystectomy. But in this study, the complications recorded were occurred during the period of the treatment of radical cystectomy, and were all related to the treatment of surgery.

Conclusion

CCI, compared with CDC, is better for evaluating the severity of complications in elderly patients after radical cystectomy and PLND by implementing the EAU guideline for complication reporting.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the clinical research ethics committee of Peking University First Hospital. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by HWH, ZZ, HH, and MS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by HWH and HW. and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 81272829).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.1002110/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection; CDC, Clavien–Dindo classification; CCI, Comprehensive Complication Index; EAU, European Association of Urology; EBL, estimated blood loss; SCr, serum creatinine.

References

1. Lenis AT, Lec PM, Chamie K, MSHS M. Bladder cancer: A review. JAMA (2020) 324(19):1980–91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17598

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Novara G, De Marco V, Aragona M, Boscolo-Berto R, Cavalleri S, Artibani W, et al. Complications and mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder transitional cell cancer. J Urol (2009) 182(3):914–21. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, Brooks CM, Cronin AM, Savage C, et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol (2009) 55(1):164–74. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Schiavina R, Borghesi M, Guidi M, Vagnoni V, Zukerman Z, Pultrone C, et al. Perioperative complications and mortality after radical cystectomy when using a standardized reporting methodology. Clin Genitourin Cancer (2013) 11(2):189–97. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2012.12.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Roghmann F, Trinh QD, Braun K, von Bodman C, Brock M, Noldus J, et al. Standardized assessment of complications in a contemporary series of European patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Int J Urol (2014) 21(2):143–9. doi: 10.1111/iju.12232

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hirobe M, Tanaka T, Shindo T, Ichihara K, Hotta H, Takahashi A, et al. Complications within 90 days after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: results of a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol (2018) 23(4):734–41. doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-1245-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kanno T, Ito K, Sawada A, Saito R, Kobayashi T, Yamada H, et al. Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic radical cystectomy in a Japanese multicenter cohort. Int J Urol (2019) 26(4):493–8. doi: 10.1111/iju.13917

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, Remzi M, Rouprêt M, Truss M, et al. Guidelines on reporting and grading of complications after urological surgical procedures. European Urology (2012) 61(2):341–. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Gandaglia G, Bravi CA, Dell’Oglio P, Mazzone E, Fossati N, Scuderi S, et al. The impact of implementation of the European association of urology guidelines panel recommendations on reporting and grading complications on perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2018) 74(1):4–7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Vetterlein MW, Klemm J, Gild P, Bradtke M, Soave A, Dahlem R, et al. Improving estimates of perioperative morbidity after radical cystectomy using the European association of urology quality criteria for standardized reporting and introducing the comprehensive complication index. Eur Urol (2020) 77(1):55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg (2004) 240(2):205–13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg (2013) 258(1):1–7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Kowalewski KF, Müller D, Mühlbauer J, Hendrie JD, Worst TS, Wessels F, et al. The comprehensive complication index (CCI): proposal of a new reporting standard for complications in major urological surgery. World J Urol (2021) 39(5):1631–9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03356-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Froehner M, Brausi MA, Herr HW, Muto G, Studer UE. Complications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the elderly. Eur Urol (2009) 56(3):443–54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J chronic Dis (1987) 40(5):373–83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Poletajew S, Zapała L, Piotrowicz S, Wołyniec P, Sochaj M, Buraczyński P, et al. Interobserver variability of clavien-dindo scoring in urology. Int J Urol (2014) 21(12):1274–8. doi: 10.1111/iju.12576

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Kim TH, Suh YS, Huh YJ, Son YG, Park JH, Yang JY, et al. The comprehensive complication index (CCI) is a more sensitive complication index than the conventional clavien-dindo classification in radical gastric cancer surgery. Gastric Cancer (2018) 21(1):171–81. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0728-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kim SH, Hwang HK, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Comprehensive complication index or clavien-dindo classification: Which is better for evaluating the severity of postoperative complications following pancreatectomy? World J Surg (2021) 45(3):849–56. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05859-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Grüne B, Kowalewksi KF, Waldbillig F, von Hardenberg J, Rassweiler-Seyfried MC, Kriegmair MC, et al. The comprehensive complication index (CCI) for improved reporting of complications in endourological stone treatment. Urolithiasis (2021) 49(3):269–79. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01234-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Slankamenac K, Nederlof N, Pessaux P, de Jonge J, Wijnhoven BP, Breitenstein S, et al. The comprehensive complication index: a novel and more sensitive endpoint for assessing outcome and reducing sample size in randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg (2014) 260(5):757–62. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000948

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Wang H, Huang H, Shang M, Hao H, Xi Z. Comparative study of perioperative and oncological outcomes between elderly patients and younger patients who received radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: A single-center retrospective study. Cancer Manage Res (2022) 14:603–13. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S350587

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Biyani CS, Pecanka J, Rouprêt M, Jensen JB, Mitropoulos D. Intraoperative adverse incident classification (EAUiaiC) by the European association of urology ad hoc complications guidelines panel. Eur Urol (2020) 77(5):601–10. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.11.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Grabbert M, Grimm T, Buchner A, Kretschmer A, Apfelbeck M, Schulz G, et al. Risks and benefits of pelvic lymphadenectomy in octogenarians undergoing radical cystectomy due to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Int Urol Nephrol (2017) 49(12):2137–42. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1699-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: elderly patient, radical cystectomy, complications, EAU guidelines, comprehensive complication index

Citation: Huang H, Zhang Z, Hao H, Wang H, Shang M and Xi Z (2022) The comprehensive complication index is more sensitive than the Clavien–Dindo classification for grading complications in elderly patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: Implementing the European Association of Urology guideline. Front. Oncol. 12:1002110. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1002110

Received: 24 July 2022; Accepted: 03 October 2022;
Published: 20 October 2022.

Edited by:

Lorenzo Bianchi, University of Bologna, Italy

Reviewed by:

Daniele Mattevi, Santa Chiara Hospital, Italy
Oliver Walther Hakenberg, University Hospital Rostock, Germany

Copyright © 2022 Huang, Zhang, Hao, Wang, Shang and Xi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhijun Xi, eGl6aGlqdW5AaHNjLnBrdS5lZHUuY24=

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.