A correction has been applied to this article in:
Corrigendum: Chemoresistance and Metastasis in Breast Cancer Molecular Mechanisms and Novel Clinical Strategies
Jun Cao1†
Mengdi Zhang
Bin Wang
Long Zhang
Fangfang Zhou
Meiyu Fang- 1Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, Department of Rare and Head and Neck Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
- 2Ministry of Education (MOE) Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection and Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- 3Institutes of Biology and Medical Science, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in females worldwide. Chemotherapy is the standard breast cancer treatment; however, chemoresistance is often seen in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Owing to high heterogeneity, the mechanisms of breast cancer chemoresistance and metastasis have not been fully investigated. The possible molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance in breast cancer include efflux transporters, signaling pathways, non-coding RNAs, and cancer stem cells. However, to overcome this hurdle, the use of novel clinical strategies such as drug carriers, immunotherapy, and autophagy regulation, are being investigated. The goal of this review is to summarize the current data about the molecular mechanisms of breast cancer chemoresistance and the novel clinical strategies; thus, providing a useful clinical tool to explore optimal treatment for breast cancer.
Introduction
Breast cancer (BRCA) is the most common malignancy and the most frequent cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide (1). BRCA is a complex heterogeneous disease classified into three basic types based on the presence or absence of molecular biomarkers for estrogen or progesterone receptors and human epidermal growth factor 2 (ERBB2; formerly HER2). These molecular biomarkers are hormone receptor positive/ERBB2 negative (HR+/ERBB2-; 70% of patients), ERBB2 positive (ERBB2+; 15%-20%), and triple-negative (tumors lacking all 3 standard molecular markers; 15%) (2, 3).
Clinically, the main treatment methods for BRCA include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and targeted therapy (2). Despite that, BRCA is curable in 70%-80% of patients in early stage, non-metastatic disease. The chemoresistance and metastasis in some BRCAs, especially in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), are still inevitable and lead to poor prognosis. Chemoresistance is the insensitivity of cancer cells to therapy, which is a key factor resulting in reduced efficacy of anti-BRCA chemotherapy (4). Although various attempts have been made to restore the sensitivity of existing chemotherapeutic drugs and to overcome drug resistance in BRCA, the effects are still unsatisfactory.
This review will summarize the current understanding of chemoresistance mechanisms in BRCA and further discuss the potential of novel clinical strategies to overcome chemoresistance.
Chemoresistance Mechanisms in BRCA
Chemotherapy is currently the major systemic treatment for BRCA, but unfortunately, patients often develop resistance. The mechanisms of chemoresistance in BRCA urgently need better understanding.
Efflux Transporters
Many cancer cells are resistant to a broad spectrum of anticancer drugs through a phenomenon called multidrug resistance (MDR). The major mechanism of MDR is the expression of a class of ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC transporters use ATP to pump chemotherapeutic drugs out of cancer cells and decrease intracellular accumulation of anticancer drugs (5) (Figure 1). Ample evidence shows that the expression of ABC transporters is strongly implicated in the chemoresistance of numerous solid tumors, including BRCA (5). In the past three decades, at least 15 human ABC transporters have been showed to efflux cancer drugs in some context (5–10) (Table 1). In this review, we focus on the subset of ABC transporters that were first reported as multidrug efflux pumps, including ABCB1 [P-glycoprotein/P-gp/MDR1), ABCG2 (BRCA Resistance Protein/BCRP), and ABCC1 (multidrug resistance protein 1(MRP1)] (5, 6).
FIGURE 1
Figure 1 The substrate binds to the binding pocket in TMDs and ATP binds to the two binding sites in the NBDs. This is followed by the hydrolysis of ATP that generates a conformational change, allowing the substrate to be released from the protein. The second molecule of ATP is hydrolyzed, allowing for a conformational reset, where substrate and ATP can bind again so the process can repeat.
TABLE 1
Table 1 ABC transporters and MDR.
P-gp is the first identified and the most well-investigated protein, which is encoded by a single polypeptide chain with two homologous nucleotide binding domains (NBDs) and two homologous transmembrane domains. A plethora of clinically indispensable chemotherapeutic drugs such as taxol, vincristine, etoposide, and daunorubicin, are susceptible to P-gp-mediated efflux (11, 15–17). Thus, P-gp has been recognized as a promising strategy to overcome MDR and effectively treat cancer (15, 18). In the past 30 years, several P-gp inhibitors or modulators have been investigated in clinical trials in the hope of circumventing MDR, with only limited success (15, 19, 20). Presently, many drug development programs focus on the discovery of new compounds or strategies to bypass the activity of P-gp.
BRCP is the second member of subfamily G within the large human ABC transporter superfamily, which is strongly implicated in the chemoresistance of stem cells in TNBC. As an efflux pump showing a broad substrate specificity localized on the cellular plasma membrane, BCRP excretes a variety of chemotherapeutic agents, such as mitoxantrone, doxorubicin, SN-38, and several TKIs (12, 21). In contrast to the extensive clinical development of P-gp inhibitors, few small-molecule inhibitors specific to BCRP have been tested in clinical trials to date. Zhang et al. (22) found that regorafenib significantly sensitized BCRP-mediated MDR by increasing their intracellular accumulation.
MRP1 is distributed on the membrane of tumor cells. This induces drug resistance by mediating intracellular drug excretion and altering intracellular drug redistribution. Despite the limited sequence identity with P-gp, MRP1 and P-gp have significant substrate overlap. Nevertheless, MRP1 has been shown to transport various neutral and anionic hydrophobic compounds and products of phase II drug metabolism, including many glutathione and glucuronide conjugates (5, 23, 24). In addition, multidrug 88 resistant protein-8 (ABCC11/MRP8) was overexpressed in TNBC and conferred resistance to 5-Fluorouracil and methotrexate (25, 26). Lin et al. (27) reported that histone methyltransferase KDM5c [Lysine(K)-specific demethylase 5C] might downregulate ABCC1 expression by demethylating ABCC1 H3K4me3 in colon cancer.
To date, clinical data about ABC transporter inhibitors in BRCA are still limited. However, the known data support the idea that further research on ABC transporters will be essential in overcoming cancer MDR and in designing strategies against TNBC chemoresistance.
Signaling Pathway
An intricate network of signaling pathways governs the survival, growth, and invasion of BRCA. PTEN/PI3K/AKT/mTOR, NF-κB, and JAK/STAT are implicated in chemotherapy resistance to BRCAs (11, 16) (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2
Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the BC signaling pathways. (A) PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway; (B) NF-κB signaling pathway; (C) JAK/STAT signaling pathway; (D) Wnt/Frizzled/β-catenin signaling pathway; (E) Notch signaling pathway; (F) Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway; (G) Hippo signaling pathway; (H) TGF-β signaling pathway.
PI3K-AKT-mTOR (PAM) pathway is one of the critical mechanisms of cells control survival, growth, proliferation, and motility. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) is a heterodimeric molecule from a larger family of lipid kinases that phosphorylate 3-hydroxyl group of phosphoinositides, which can activate AKT kinase by regulating phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP3) (28). The activation of AKT shows an important indirect effect on the phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which will in turn enhance protein synthesis and cell growth, giving malignant cells a significant advantage (16, 28). PAM activity is negatively regulated by tumor suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). Because of PTEN loss and high AKT expression, PAM pathway is often associated with aggressive tumors, poor prognosis, and chemoresistance in BRCA (16, 28, 29). Several drugs targeting PI3K/ATK/mTOR are currently in clinical trials, in combination with endocrine therapy and anti-HER2 therapy (28, 30).
The activation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), a proinflammatory transcription factor, is a commonly observed phenomenon in BRCA. NF-κB family consists of five members, namely, RelA (p65), c-Rel, RelB, NFκB1 (p50), and NFκB2 (p52), which form homo- and heterodimers to activate the transcription of target genes regulating host inflammatory and immune responses as well as cellular growth and survival (16, 31). Moreover, it is well established that NF-κB signaling pathway is a crucial regulator of TNBC and is associated with chemoresistance and metastasis in BRCA (16, 32, 33). Ekambaram et al. (34) showed that NF-κB activation promotes the aggressiveness of BRCA. Kastrati at al. (35) reported that NF-κB pathway promotes tamoxifen tolerance and disease metastasis in estrogen receptor-positive BRCAs.
JAK/STAT pathway was originally discovered as an evolutionarily conserved cellular mechanism mediating the actions of cytokines, interferons, and growth factors and as well control their gene expression (36). The activation of JAK/STAT pathway in tumor cells is known to contribute to tumor growth and progression. Both STAT3 and STAT5 have been shown to promote BRCA growth and progression, and JAK/STAT pathway has been found to be a potential therapeutic target in BRCA patients (37, 38).
Additionally, some signaling pathways, which play essential roles in cancer stem cell self-renewal, represent a promising approach to control chemoresistance and metastasis of BRCAs.
Wnt/β-catenin pathway is an important regulator of normal breast development and abnormal tumorigenesis. Wnt signaling proteins interact with the frizzled family of cell-surface receptors and activate the proteins of the disheveled family, which in turn results in the inhibition of proteolytic degradation of β-catenin. Subsequently, stabilized β-catenin is translocated into the nucleus, leading to the transcription of target genes such as C-Myc and Cyclin D1, which are involved in determining cell migration, cytoskeletal activity, cell polarity, and cellular differentiation (39, 40). Recently, the overexpression of Wnt pathway has been observed in breast, lung, and hematopoietic malignancies and contributes to tumor recurrence (41). Multiple Wnt/β-catenin targeted inhibitors were designed in the wake of these studies (42). Hence, the inhibition of Wnt signaling pathway has been proposed as a potential therapeutic strategy to target BRCA.
Notch signaling pathway plays an essential role in normal stem cell maintenance and differentiation, a dysfunction which has been linked to the development of BRCA and is believed to be upregulated in a variety of cancers (43). Canonical notch signaling pathway has four cell surface receptors (Notch 1–4) and five transmembrane ligands (Delta-like 1,3,4 and JAGGED-1,2). These notch cell surface receptors can be activated by membrane-tethered ligands on neighboring cells. The activation of cell surface receptors induces successive cleavages by ADAM proteases and γ-secretase, resulting in the release of intracellular domain (NICD) of the receptor, which is in turn translocated to the nucleus and regulates context-specific patterns of cancer-related gene expression (44, 45). Therapeutic resistance in BRCA is also believed to be associated with the notch signaling pathway. Previous studies have confirmed that notch signaling is crucial in chemoresistance and have demonstrated the ability of notch inhibitors to sensitize cells, including BRCA and cytotoxic agents (46, 47). Further investigation on notch inhibitors has been an area of strong interest in cancer research.
Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway plays a crucial role in embryonic development, tissue regeneration, and stem cell renewal. Hh pathway consists of three secreted ligands (Sonic-SHH, Indian 159 IHH, and Desert-DHH), which bind transmembrane receptor/co-receptors Patched (PTCH) and Smoothened (SMO). Three glioma-associated oncogene transcription factors (GLI1–3) are the main effectors that regulate the expression of many target genes, such as ABCG2 and VEGF (48, 49). In mouse models of TNBC, hedgehog ligand produced by neoplastic cells reprograms cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) to provide a supportive niche for the acquisition of chemoresistance (50). Moreover, the combination of hedgehog pathway inhibitors and itraconazole was observed to improve the prognosis of BRCA (51).
Hippo signaling pathway is important in regulating tissue homeostasis, organ size, and tumorigenesis. Hippo signaling is modulated via two pairs of kinases, Mst1/2 and Lats1/2. Upon the phosphorylation of downstream Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) or Lats1/2-induced TAZ, transcription is inactivated and leads to cellular degradation, whereas dephosphorylation leads to YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation and subsequent activation of transcription (52). Dysregulation of hippo pathway leading to the overexpression of YAP1 or TAZ has been seen in many types of cancer (53, 54). Furthermore, some studies have provided evidence that YAP acts as a promoter of focal adhesion and tumor invasiveness by regulating FAK phosphorylation in BRCA (55).
Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is a member of a large cytokine superfamily that consists of over 30 related growth factors, including three TGF-β isoforms (TGF-β1–3) (16). TGF-β exerts its cellular effects via TGF-β type I and type II cell surface receptors (TβRI/II). TGF-β initially engages in TβRII, which subsequently drives the recruitment of TβRI and the formation of a heterotetrameric complex. The activation of TβRI, causes the recruitment and phosphorylation of the main effectors of this pathway, Smad2 and Smad3, which interact with Smad4 to form a heteromeric complex that is transported into the nucleus to regulate a series of genes, such as ANGPTL4, CTGF, IL11, S100A4, and PTHrP, and further facilitates cancer cell migration and invasion (56, 57). In oncology, TGF-β appears to have a dual function, where it represses early tumor growth but promotes metastasis in advanced stages. However, the mechanism by which TGF‐β switches its role from a tumor inhibitor to a cancer promoter remains unclear (58).
In conclusion, the crucial role of the developmental pathways in BRCA initiation, progression, metastasis, and chemoresistance is undeniable. Because of the considerable crosstalk and collaboration existing in this signaling network, successful targeted medicines still need further research.
Non-Coding RNAs (ncRNAs)
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are the regulators of intracellular and intercellular signaling in BRCA (59). Owing to the development of next-generation sequencing technologies, ncRNAs, including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs), play essential roles in chemoresistance in BRCA.
miRNAs are the major class of endogenous, small ncRNA molecules of 18–25 nucleotides in length. Recent studies have shown that dysregulated miRNAs often cause the development of metastasis and chemoresistance in BRCA. Li et al. (60) demonstrated that the overexpression of miR-770 inhibited doxorubicin resistance and metastasis in vivo. Further experiments confirmed that miR-770 regulates chemoresistance and metastasis by targeting STMN1 in BRCA. Rodriguez et al. (61) found that loss of miR-424(322)/503 promotes chemoresistance in BRCA via the overexpression of two of its targets: BCL-2 and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R). In addition, a novel miR-20a/MAPK1/c-Myc feedback loop was reported to significantly regulate BRCA growth and chemoresistance (62). Based on these findings, some researchers proposed that the combined use of miRNAs and chemotherapeutic agents might be a promising therapeutic strategy to increase long-term drug responses in BRCAs, especially for chemo-resistant patients (62–64).
lncRNAs are greater than 200 nucleotides and sometimes are 100 kb long. Recent research verified the involvement of lncRNA-small nucleolar RNA host gene 14 (SNHG14) in the mediation of trastuzumab responses via tumor cell extracellular exosomes. The expression level of serum exosomal lncR-SNHG14 was upregulated in patients who showed resistance to trastuzumab and the knockdown of lncR-SNHG14 potently promoted trastuzumab-induced cytotoxicity (65). In another study, Dong et al. (66) confirmed that lncRNA AGAP2-AS1 could promote BRCA growth and trastuzumab resistance by activating NF-κB signaling pathway and upregulating MyD88 expression. High expression of lncRNA AGAP2-AS1 was associated with poor clinical response to trastuzumab therapy in BRCA patients. Furthermore, Yao et al. (67) reported that novel lncRNA NONHSAT101069 was significantly overexpressed in BC specimens and promoted epirubicin resistance. lncRNA cancer susceptibility candidate 2 (CASC2) and lncRNA ferritin heavy chain 1 pseudogene 3 (FTH1P3) were found to activate paclitaxel resistance in BRCA through the regulation of miRNA (68, 69).
circRNAs are a group of ncRNAs formed by covalently closed loops through back-splicing. The latest study reported that circRNAs are key regulators in the development and progression of human cancers (70). In vitro loss-of-function experiments showed that circ-ABCB10 knockdown suppressed the proliferation and increased the apoptosis of BRCA cells by sponging miR-1271 (71). Circ 222 ANKS1B was significantly overexpressed in TNBC tissues compared to normal BRCA tissues, which promoted BRCA invasion and metastasis by inducing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (72). Du et al. (73) reported that circ-Dnmt1-mediated autophagy is essential in enhancing BRCA progression. High expression of circular RNA circ-Dnmt1 could bind to and regulate oncogenic proteins in BRCA cells.
Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs)
There is substantial evidence that BRCAs are driven by a population of cells that display stem cell properties. This small subset of tumorigenic cells termed cancer stem cells (CSCs), not only enable tumor formation and progression but also mediate tumor metastasis and therapeutic resistance (13, 74). Previous studies have shown that BRCA stem cells (BCSCs) overexpress various ABC transporters such as P-gp, ABCG2, ABCC1, and ABCB5 (11, 14). Studies have shown that these transporters can help BCSCs to pump out chemotherapeutic agents and enhance the key processes involved in cancer progression (75, 76) (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3
Figure 3 Schematic representation of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and their role in chemoresistance. The cancer stem cells (CSCs), not only enable tumor formation and progression but also mediate tumor metastasis and therapeutic resistance. On the one hand, the CSCs survived from chemotherapy will gain the chemoresistance and enhance the key processes involved in cancer progression. On the other hand, the cancer therapeutics targeted to CSCs biomarkers which can modulate EMT and CSC properties, can lead to the tumor shrinkage in clinical therapeutics.
In addition, a series of BCSC surface biomarkers such as CD10, CD24, CD44, CD133, GPR77, ALDH1, EpCAM, and ABCG2 have been confirmed, and their overexpression is an important cause of BCSC chemoresistance (11). Su et al. (77) demonstrated that two cell-surface molecules, CD10 and GPR77, can promote tumor formation and chemoresistance by providing a survival niche for BCSCs. Moreover, Li et al. (78) found that both high CD44/CD24 ratio and ALDH1+ were conserved during metastasis. These results confirmed the potential of these BCSC biomarkers in monitoring tumor progression, metastasis, and even in cancer therapeutics.
These therapeutic targets, which can modulate EMT and CSC properties, may be utilized in clinical therapeutics.
Novel Clinical Strategies
Novel Drug Delivery System
Presently, endocrine therapy is the main therapy for hormone-responsive or receptor-positive BRCA. However, poor solubility and bioavailability, lack of intracellular transport within cancer cells, and development of chemoresistance are the problems associated with conventional therapies for BRCA, especially TNBC (11, 29). Hence, novel drug delivery systems are being explored to fight this lethal disease.
Nanocarriers, including nanoparticles, nanoscale, and liposomes, have been shown to have the advantages of targeted drug release, prolonged blood circulation, enhanced synergies, and superior biocompatibility (79). Zhang et al. (80) developed a core-shell nanocarrier coated with cationic albumin to simultaneously deliver miRNA-34a and docetaxel (DTX) into BRCA cells. The co-delivery nanocarriers prolonged the blood circulation of DTX, enhanced tumor accumulation of cargo, and significantly inhibited tumor growth and metastasis both in vivo and in vitro. Bose et al. (81) investigated a tumor cell-derived extracellular vesicle-based nanoplatform for multimodal miRNA delivery and phototherapy treatments, which attenuated doxorubicin (DOX) resistance in BRCA cells with a 3-fold higher cell killing efficiency than in cells treated with DOX alone. Gong et al. (82) developed a strategy to produce nanoscale target-specific Exo to co-deliver cholesterol-modified miRNA and chemotherapeutic drugs to TNBC cells, which showed improved anticancer effects, without adverse effects. Furthermore, some researchers explored the natural ability of macrophages to target cancer cells through extracellular vesicles (EVs) as drug delivery vehicles. Haney et al. (83) reported that drug loaded EVs can target TNBC in vivo and abolish tumor growth. In another study, Tang et al. (84) assessed the feasibility of liposomal drug delivery system combining bevacizumab and chemotherapy for the treatment of HER2/MDR double-positive BRCA cells. In HER2 positive and multidrug resistant BRCA cell mouse model, tumor size decreased steadily within 60 days.
Nanomedicine helps in in bringing major advances in the chemoresistance and metastasis in BRCAs. Looking into the future, the use of nanomedicine, combining anticancer targeted therapy and multifunctional nanocarriers that contain therapeutic and imaging agents, might become promising cancer treatments to achieve the goal of personalized medicine based on the needs of an individual patient or cell subpopulation and overcome the chemoresistance.
Novel Anticancer Drugs
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs)
Immunotherapy is a promising treatment for multiple solid tumors using the patient’s own immune system directly to target and eradicate neoplastic cells. Early data have revealed the clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which mainly target programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) in small number of metastatic BRCA patients (85, 86).
PD-1 is an inhibitory immune checkpoint inhibitor that limits T-cell effector function within the tissues and is expressed on the surfaces of immune effector cells. Adams et al. (87) assessed the safety and antitumor activity of PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1-positive advanced TNBC. The median duration of response was 10.4 months. The median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI 2.0-2.2), and the median overall survival was 18.0 months (95% CI 12.9-23.0). Emens et al. (88) evaluated the clinical activity and safety associated with the use of single-agent atezolizumab (anti programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)) in patients with metastatic TNBC. The result showed that median PFS was 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.3-1.6 months) and median OS was 17.6 months (95% CI, 10.2 months and above). Based on these results, PD-1 antagonists have a manageable safety profile and show durable antitumor activity as first-line therapy for patients with PD-L1-positive BRCA.
CTLA-4 is a T-cell inhibitory receptor that is expressed on activated CD8+ T cells and CD4+regulatory T cells that express CD25 and FOXP3. Therefore, CTLA-4 inhibitors induce anti-tumor immunity by blocking FOXP3+ Treg cells, resulting in enhanced inhibition of tumor cells (89). Currently, ipilimumab and tremelimumab (two promising anti-CTLA-4 antibodies) have been used in clinical trials related to TNBC (90). Nanoparticle-based mRNA vaccine and CTLA-4 inhibitor for TNBC have also been demonstrated as a potential strategy (91). Moreover, Pai et al. (92) developed a dual variable domain immunoglobulin of anti-CTLA4 antibody that can help deplete tumor-infiltration, but not tissue-resident Tregs, preserving antitumor effects while minimizing toxicity.
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) Inhibitors
The cyclin D/cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6)–retinoblastoma protein pathway plays a key role in the proliferation of both normal breast epithelium and BRCA cells (93). Abemaciclib is the most potent inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6 and shows promising clinical activity in metastatic BRCA. In a phase II study, Dickler et al. (94) evaluated the single-agent activity and safety of abemaciclib in women with HR+/HER2− metastatic BRCA. The result showed the objective response rate was 19.7%, clinical benefit rate of 42.4%, median PFS of 6.0 months, and median OS of 17.7 months, which confirmed the striking activity of abemaciclib as a single agent. In a neoadjuvant phase II study, Palbociclib, another CDK4/6 Inhibitor, was found to overcome intrinsic endocrine resistance in primary BRCA (95). Moreover, the combination of Palbociclib and Letrozole resulted in significantly longer PFS than monotherapy among patients with advanced BRCA (96).
Combination Therapy
Compared to single-agent therapy, combination treatment regimens may provide a more efficacious solution to BRCA resistance. The combination of abemaciclib, fulvestrant, and trastuzumab has been found to improve PFS and prognosis in patients with advanced BRCA (97). Teo et al. (98) reported that combined PI3Kα and CDK4/6 inhibition is synergistically effective against multiple TNBC models by increasing apoptosis, cell-cycle arrest, and tumor immunogenicity and generating immunogenic cell death. In a Phase I trial, Clark et al. (99) enrolled cohorts of patients to sequentially ingest oral doses of Palbociclib intermittently between days 1 and 19 of a 28-day cycle alternating with weekly paclitaxel. The result showed that the combination of paclitaxel and palbociclib is feasible and safe, without evidence of additive toxicity in patients with advanced BRCA. In addition, atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel have been confirmed to prolong PFS among patients with metastatic TNBC (100). The combination of tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine has also been reported to improve PFS and OS outcomes in HER2- positive metastatic BRCA patients (101).
Overall, it is obvious that immunotherapy is emerging as a novel promising option for TNBC. However, further investigations are required to completely determine the safety and effectiveness of these immunotherapies and eventually define the most effective combination regimens for the treatment of TNBC.
Autophagy Regulation
Autophagy is a tightly regulated catabolic process that facilitates nutrient recycling from damaged organelles and other cellular components through lysosomal degradation and provides energy and macromolecular precursors (102) (Figure 4). Substantial evidence has indicated that autophagy plays a dual role in the regulation of chemoresistance in cancer patients by either promoting drug resistance or increasing drug sensitivity (103, 104). Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is the only clinically approved autophagy inhibitor that increases tumor cell death alone or in combination with targeted agents or cytotoxic chemotherapy (103, 104). In a recent study, Cook et al. (105) demonstrated that HCQ can increase antiestrogen responsiveness in ER+ BRCA through the inhibition of autophagy and the combination of HCQ and tamoxifen showed a positive outcome for ongoing neoadjuvant clinical trials. Furthermore, with the development of nanotechnology, nanomaterials can modulate autophagy and have been exploited as therapeutic agents against cancer (106). Although, autophagy inhibition has been suggested as a promising approach for chemoresistance in BRCAs, due to the lack of organ-specificity, the utilization of autophagy-related kinase inhibitors/activators may also lead to uncontrolled side effects. Whether these agents of autophagy regulation will eventually be used in the clinic still requires further study.
FIGURE 4
Figure 4 Dual role of autophagy for therapeutic purposes in cancer. Autophagy is induced in tumors by many different stress conditions including some cancer therapeutic approaches, which function as a death executioner to induce autophagic cell death. But autophagy also provides resistance to cancer cells against chemo-/radio-therapies and cell death.
BCSC-Directed Therapy
Increasing evidence shows the existence of tumor initiating or cancer stem cells within tumors that are responsible for drug resistance, cancer recurrence, and cancer metastasis. Currently, novel anti-BCSCs drugs, targeting the Wnt/Frizzled/β-catenin, notch and hedgehog pathways have reached clinical trials for BRCA patients (14). The most clinically evolved approach is the inhibition of notch signaling using γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs). At present, researchers have shown that GSIs can inhibit BRCA growth in a process that is coupled with IL6 induction and thus might serve as a novel therapeutic strategy for treating patients with BRCAs (107, 108). Other inhibitors of Notch signaling, such as CB-103, are also currently in phase I/II clinical trials for advanced or metastatic BRCA (14). In addition, the Wnt/Frizzled/β-catenin pathway is overactivated in TNBC and several other cancers. Wnt inhibitors work to eradicate the tumor resistant stem cell and thus may overcome resistance to conventional therapy (39). Ahmed et al. (109) reported that an anti-leprotic drug clofazimine is effective against TNBC by specifically inhibiting canonical Wnt signaling. Inhibitors of hedgehog pathway have also been explored in vitro and in vivo, but their efficacy in BRCA has been disappointing (49). In summary, accumulating evidence has shown the potential efficacy of targeting BCSCs in reversing drug resistance in vitro and in vivo. However, the majority of studies are still in the early stages. Thus, continuing effort in establishing clinically relevant biomarkers of BCSC is urgently needed for translating the knowledge from laboratory to clinical practice.
Conclusion
With the rapid development of molecular biology, great progress has been achieved in breast cancer treatment; however, some groups of BRCA, such as TNBC, display significant problems of chemoresistance and metastasis. Owing to the complexity of BRCAs, completely understanding the molecular mechanisms of BRCA remains a significant challenge, however, is vital for the identification of new treatment targets. Currently, novel treatment regimens have been proven as a more efficient solution to BRCA resistance than conventional therapy. The exploration of novel delivery systems has provided a potential approach to improve the effectiveness of anti-cancer agents in cancers with chemoresistance. Moreover, the progress of immunotherapy offers a promising alternative for drug-resistant tumors, and further research is needed to explain the complex mechanisms of tumors. Although the regulation of autophagy and cancer stem cells has not been widely used clinically it is hopeful to improve the prognosis of BRCA with chemoresistance and metastasis. In conclusion, future clinical studies on BRCA are needed, with a focus on molecular mechanisms. Novel clinical strategies are expected to improve the survival of BRCA patients.
Author Contributions
CJ and ZM conceived and drafted the manuscript. ZL, FY, and FZ discussed the concepts of the manuscript. ZM drew the figures. LZ and FZ approved the version to be submitted. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by a special program from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2016YFA0502500 to LZ), the Chinese National Natural Science Funds (81702653 to JC; 31925013, U20A20393 and 91753139 to LZ; 31871405 and 82041009 to FZ), Jiangsu National Science Foundation (BK20180043 and 19KJA550003 to FZ), the Zhejiang Natural Science Fund (LD19C070001to LZ), Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan (2018253753 to JC), and A project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions. This work was supported by a special program from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2016YFA0502500 to LZ), the Chinese National Natural Science Funds (81702653 to JC; 31925013, U20A20393 and 91753139 to LZ; 31871405 and 82041009 to FZ), Jiangsu National Science Foundation (BK20180043 and 19KJA550003 to FZ), the Zhejiang Natural Science Fund (LD19C070001to LZ), Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan (2018253753 to JC), and A project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We would like to apologize to those researchers whose related work we were not able to cite in this review.
References
1. Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, Gnant M, Houssami N, Poortmans P, et al. Breast Cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers (2019) 5(1):66. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2
2. Waks AG, Winer EP. Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review. JAMA (2019) 321(3):288–300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19323
3. Yeo SK, Guan JL. Breast Cancer: Multiple Subtypes Within a Tumor? Trends Cancer (2017) 3(11):753–60. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.09.001
4. Nikolaou M, Pavlopoulou A, Georgakilas AG, Kyrodimos E. The Challenge of Drug Resistance in Cancer Treatment: A Current Overview. Clin Exp Metastasis (2018) 35(4):309–18. doi: 10.1007/s10585-018-9903-0
5. Robey RW, Pluchino KM, Hall MD, Fojo AT, Bates SE, Gottesman MM. Revisiting the Role of ABC Transporters in Multidrug-Resistant Cancer. Nat Rev Cancer (2018) 18(7):452–64. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0005-8
6. Fletcher JI, Williams RT, Henderson MJ, Norris MD, Haber M. ABC Transporters as Mediators of Drug Resistance and Contributors to Cancer Cell Biology. Drug Resist Update (2016) 26:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2016.03.001
7. Kathawala RJ, Gupta P, Ashby CJ, Chen ZS. The Modulation of ABC Transporter-Mediated Multidrug Resistance in Cancer: A Review of the Past Decade. Drug Resist Update (2015) 18:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2014.11.002
8. Begicevic RR, Falasca M. ABC Transporters in Cancer Stem Cells: Beyond Chemoresistance. Int J Mol Sci (2017) 18(11):2362. doi: 10.3390/ijms18112362
9. Domenichini A, Adamska A, Falasca M. ABC Transporters as Cancer Drivers: Potential Functions in Cancer Development. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj (2019) 1863(1):52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.09.019
10. Pasello M, Giudice AM, Scotlandi K. The ABC Subfamily A Transporters: Multifaceted Players With Incipient Potentialities in Cancer. Semin Cancer Biol (2020) 60:57–71. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.10.004
11. Ji X, Lu Y, Tian H, Meng X, Wei M, Cho WC. Chemoresistance Mechanisms of Breast Cancer and Their Countermeasures. BioMed Pharmacother (2019) 114:108800. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108800
12. Toyoda Y, Takada T, Suzuki H. Inhibitors of Human ABCG2: From Technical Background to Recent Updates With Clinical Implications. Front Pharmacol (2019) 10:208. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00208
13. Yang F, Xu J, Tang L, Guan X. Breast Cancer Stem Cell: The Roles and Therapeutic Implications. Cell Mol Life Sci (2017) 74(6):951–66. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2334-7
14. Palomeras S, Ruiz-Martínez S, Puig T. Targeting Breast Cancer Stem Cells to Overcome Treatment Resistance. Molecules (2018) 23(9). doi: 10.3390/molecules23092193
15. Waghray D, Zhang Q. Inhibit or Evade Multidrug Resistance P-Glycoprotein in Cancer Treatment. J Med Chem (2018) 61(12):5108–21. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01457
16. Nedeljković M, Damjanović A. Mechanisms of Chemotherapy Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer-How We Can Rise to the Challenge. Cells-Basel (2019) 8(9). doi: 10.3390/cells8090957
17. Amawi H, Sim HM, Tiwari AK, Ambudkar SV, Shukla S. ABC Transporter-Mediated Multidrug-Resistant Cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol (2019) 1141:549–80. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-7647-4_12
18. Chang YT, Wang C, Wang JY, Lee TE, Cheng YY, Morris-Natschke SL, et al. Tenulin and Isotenulin Inhibit P-Glycoprotein Function and Overcome Multidrug Resistance in Cancer Cells. Phytomedicine (2019) 53:252–62. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.09.008
19. Bauer M, Karch R, Wulkersdorfer B, Philippe C, Nics L, Klebermass EM, et al. A Proof-Of-Concept Study to Inhibit ABCG2- and ABCB1-Mediated Efflux Transport at the Human Blood-Brain Barrier. J Nucl Med (2019) 60(4):486–91. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.216432
20. Li W, Zhang H, Assaraf YG, Zhao K, Xu X, Xie J, et al. Overcoming ABC Transporter-Mediated Multidrug Resistance: Molecular Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Drug Strategies. Drug Resist Update (2016) 27:14–29. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2016.05.001
21. Hira D, Terada T. BCRP/ABCG2 and High-Alert Medications: Biochemical, Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacogenetic, and Clinical Implications. Biochem Pharmacol (2018) 147:201–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.10.004
22. Zhang YK, Wang YJ, Lei ZN, Zhang GN, Zhang XY, Wang DS, et al. Regorafenib Antagonizes BCRP-Mediated Multidrug Resistance in Colon Cancer. Cancer Lett (2019) 442:104–12. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.10.032
23. Cole SP. Multidrug Resistance Protein 1 (MRP1, ABCC1), a “Multitasking” ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) Transporter. J Biol Chem (2014) 289(45):30880–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R114.609248
24. Lu JF, Pokharel D, Bebawy M. MRP1 and its Role in Anticancer Drug Resistance. Drug Metab Rev (2015) 47(4):406–19. doi: 10.3109/03602532.2015.1105253
25. Oba T, Izumi H, Ito KI. ABCB1 and ABCC11 Confer Resistance to Eribulin in Breast Cancer Cell Lines. Oncotarget (2016) 7(43):70011–27. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11727
26. Paškevičiūtė M, Petrikaitė V. Overcoming Transporter-Mediated Multidrug Resistance in Cancer: Failures and Achievements of the Last Decades. Drug Delivery Transl Res (2019) 9(1):379–93. doi: 10.1007/s13346-018-0584-7
27. Lin H, Yang G, Yu J, Wang J, Li Q, Guo S, et al. KDM5c Inhibits Multidrug Resistance of Colon Cancer Cell Line by Down-Regulating ABCC1. BioMed Pharmacother (2018) 107:1205–9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.08.041
28. McKenna M, McGarrigle S, Pidgeon GP. The Next Generation of PI3K-Akt-mTOR Pathway Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Cohorts. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer (2018) 1870(2):185–97. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2018.08.001
29. Xia P, Xu XY. PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway in Cancer Stem Cells: From Basic Research to Clinical Application. Am J Cancer Res (2015) 5(5):1602–9.
30. Guerrero-Zotano A, Mayer IA, Arteaga CL. PI3K/AKT/mTOR: Role in Breast Cancer Progression, Drug Resistance, and Treatment. Cancer Metastasis Rev (2016) 35(4):515–24. doi: 10.1007/s10555-016-9637-x
31. Wang W, Nag SA, Zhang R. Targeting the NFκB Signaling Pathways for Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy. Curr Med Chem (2015) 22(2):264–89. doi: 10.2174/0929867321666141106124315
32. Frasor J, El-Shennawy L, Stender JD, Kastrati I. NFκB Affects Estrogen Receptor Expression and Activity in Breast Cancer Through Multiple Mechanisms. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2015) 418 Pt 3(0 3):235–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.09.013
33. Oida K, Matsuda A, Jung K, Xia Y, Jang H, Amagai Y, et al. Nuclear factor-ĸB Plays a Critical Role in Both Intrinsic and Acquired Resistance Against Endocrine Therapy in Human Breast Cancer Cells. Sci Rep (2014) 4:4057. doi: 10.1038/srep04057
34. Ekambaram P, Lee JL, Hubel NE, Hu D, Yerneni S, Campbell PG, et al. The CARMA3-Bcl10-MALT1 Signalosome Drives NFκB Activation and Promotes Aggressiveness in Angiotensin II Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Cancer Res (2018) 78(5):1225–40. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1089
35. Kastrati I, Joosten S, Semina SE, Alejo LH, Brovkovych SD, Stender JD, et al. The NF-κB Pathway Promotes Tamoxifen Tolerance and Disease Recurrence in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers. Mol Cancer Res (2020) 18(7):1018–27. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-19-1082
36. Groner B, von Manstein V. Jak Stat Signaling and Cancer: Opportunities, Benefits and Side Effects of Targeted Inhibition. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2017) 451:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.05.033
37. Quintás-Cardama A, Verstovsek S. Molecular Pathways: Jak/STAT Pathway: Mutations, Inhibitors, and Resistance. Clin Cancer Res (2013) 19(8):1933–40. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0284
38. Irey EA, Lassiter CM, Brady NJ, Chuntova P, Wang Y, Knutson TP, et al. JAK/STAT Inhibition in Macrophages Promotes Therapeutic Resistance by Inducing Expression of Protumorigenic Factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2019) 116(25):12442–51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816410116
39. Krishnamurthy N, Kurzrock R. Targeting the Wnt/beta-Catenin Pathway in Cancer: Update on Effectors and Inhibitors. Cancer Treat Rev (2018) 62:50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.11.002
40. Khan FU, Owusu-Tieku N, Dai X, Liu K, Wu Y, Tsai HI, et al. Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway-Regulated Fibromodulin Expression Is Crucial for Breast Cancer Metastasis and Inhibited by Aspirin. Front Pharmacol (2019) 10:1308. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01308
41. Huang P, Yan R, Zhang X, Wang L, Ke X, Qu Y. Activating Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway for Disease Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities. Pharmacol Ther (2019) 196:79–90. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.11.008
42. Ren L, Chen H, Song J, Chen X, Lin C, Zhang X, et al. MiR-454-3p-Mediated Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Antagonists Suppression Promotes Breast Cancer Metastasis. Theranostics (2019) 9(2):449–65. doi: 10.7150/thno.29055
43. Braune EB, Seshire A, Lendahl U. Notch and Wnt Dysregulation and Its Relevance for Breast Cancer and Tumor Initiation. Biomedicines (2018) 6(4). doi: 10.3390/biomedicines6040101
44. De Francesco EM, Maggiolini M, Musti AM. Crosstalk Between Notch, HIF-1α and GPER in Breast Cancer EMT. Int J Mol Sci (2018) 19(7). doi: 10.3390/ijms19072011
45. Aster JC, Pear WS, Blacklow SC. The Varied Roles of Notch in Cancer. Annu Rev Pathol (2017) 12:245–75. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-052016-100127
46. Massard C, Azaro A, Soria JC, Lassen U, Le Tourneau C, Sarker D, et al. First-In-Human Study of LY3039478, an Oral Notch Signaling Inhibitor in Advanced or Metastatic Cancer. Ann Oncol (2018) 29(9):1911–7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy244
47. Baker A, Wyatt D, Bocchetta M, Li J, Filipovic A, Green A, et al. Notch-1-PTEN-ERK1/2 Signaling Axis Promotes HER2+ Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation and Stem Cell Survival. Oncogene (2018) 37(33):4489–504. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0251-y
48. Riobo-Del GN, Lara MÁ, Wertheimer EV. Role of Hedgehog Signaling in Breast Cancer: Pathogenesis and Therapeutics. Cells-Basel (2019) 8(4). doi: 10.3390/cells8040375
49. Bhateja P, Cherian M, Majumder S, Ramaswamy B. The Hedgehog Signaling Pathway: A Viable Target in Breast Cancer? Cancers (Basel) (2019) 11(8). doi: 10.3390/cancers11081126
50. Cazet AS, Hui MN, Elsworth BL, Wu SZ, Roden D, Chan CL, et al. Targeting Stromal Remodeling and Cancer Stem Cell Plasticity Overcomes Chemoresistance in Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Nat Commun (2018) 9(1):2897. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05220-6
51. Wang X, Wei S, Zhao Y, Shi C, Liu P, Zhang C, et al. Anti-Proliferation of Breast Cancer Cells With Itraconazole: Hedgehog Pathway Inhibition Induces Apoptosis and Autophagic Cell Death. Cancer Lett (2017) 385:128–36. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.10.034
52. Wu L, Yang X. Targeting the Hippo Pathway for Breast Cancer Therapy. Cancers (Basel) (2018) 10(11). doi: 10.3390/cancers10110422
53. Maugeri-Saccà M, De Maria R. The Hippo Pathway in Normal Development and Cancer. Pharmacol Ther (2018) 186:60–72. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.12.011
54. Wang Y, Xu X, Maglic D, Dill MT, Mojumdar K, Ng PK, et al. Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of the Hippo Signaling Pathway in Cancer. Cell Rep (2018) 25(5):1304–17. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.001
55. Shen J, Cao B, Wang Y, Ma C, Zeng Z, Liu L, et al. Hippo Component YAP Promotes Focal Adhesion and Tumour Aggressiveness via Transcriptionally Activating THBS1/FAK Signalling in Breast Cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2018) 37(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0850-z
56. Colak S, Ten DP. Targeting TGF-β Signaling in Cancer. Trends Cancer (2017) 3(1):56–71. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2016.11.008
57. Hao Y, Baker D, Ten DP. TGF-β-Mediated Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Cancer Metastasis. Int J Mol Sci (2019) 20(11). doi: 10.3390/ijms20112767
58. Zhao Y, Ma J, Fan Y, Wang Z, Tian R, Ji W, et al. TGF-β Transactivates EGFR and Facilitates Breast Cancer Migration and Invasion Through Canonical Smad3 and ERK/Sp1 Signaling Pathways. Mol Oncol (2018) 12(3):305–21. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12162
59. Klinge CM. Non-Coding RNAs in Breast Cancer: Intracellular and Intercellular Communication. Noncoding RNA (2018) 4(4):40. doi: 10.3390/ncrna4040040
60. Li Y, Liang Y, Sang Y, Song X, Zhang H, Liu Y, et al. MiR-770 Suppresses the Chemo-Resistance and Metastasis of Triple Negative Breast Cancer via Direct Targeting of STMN1. Cell Death Dis (2018) 9(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0030-7
61. Rodriguez-Barrueco R, Nekritz EA, Bertucci F, Yu J, Sanchez-Garcia F, Zeleke TZ, et al. miR-424(322)/503 is a Breast Cancer Tumor Suppressor Whose Loss Promotes Resistance to Chemotherapy. Genes Dev (2017) 31(6):553–66. doi: 10.1101/gad.292318.116
62. Si W, Shen J, Du C, Chen D, Gu X, Li C, et al. A miR-20a/MAPK1/c-Myc Regulatory Feedback Loop Regulates Breast Carcinogenesis and Chemoresistance. Cell Death Differ (2018) 25(2):406–20. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2017.176
63. Chen D, Si W, Shen J, Du C, Lou W, Bao C, et al. miR-27b-3p Inhibits Proliferation and Potentially Reverses Multi-Chemoresistance by Targeting CBLB/GRB2 in Breast Cancer Cells. Cell Death Dis (2018) 9(2):188. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0211-4
64. Lee JW, Guan W, Han S, Hong DK, Kim LS, Kim H. MicroRNA-708-3p Mediates Metastasis and Chemoresistance Through Inhibition of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Breast Cancer. Cancer Sci (2018) 109(5):1404–13. doi: 10.1111/cas.13588
65. Dong H, Wang W, Chen R, Zhang Y, Zou K, Ye M, et al. Exosome-Mediated Transfer of lncRNA-SNHG14 Promotes Trastuzumab Chemoresistance in Breast Cancer. Int J Oncol (2018) 53(3):1013–26. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4467
66. Dong H, Wang W, Mo S, Chen R, Zou K, Han J, et al. SP1-Induced lncRNA AGAP2-AS1 Expression Promotes Chemoresistance of Breast Cancer by Epigenetic Regulation of MyD88. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2018) 37(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0875-3
67. Yao N, Fu Y, Chen L, Liu Z, He J, Zhu Y, et al. Long non-Coding RNA NONHSAT101069 Promotes Epirubicin Resistance, Migration, and Invasion of Breast Cancer Cells Through NONHSAT101069/miR-129-5p/Twist1 Axis. Oncogene (2019) 38(47):7216–33. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0904-5
68. Zheng P, Dong L, Zhang B, Dai J, Zhang Y, Wang Y, et al. Long Noncoding RNA CASC2 Promotes Paclitaxel Resistance in Breast Cancer Through Regulation of miR-18a-5p/CDK19. Histochem Cell Biol (2019) 152(4):281–91. doi: 10.1007/s00418-019-01794-4
69. Wang R, Zhang T, Yang Z, Jiang C, Seng J. Long non-Coding RNA FTH1P3 Activates Paclitaxel Resistance in Breast Cancer Through miR-206/ABCB1. J Cell Mol Med (2018) 22(9):4068–75. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13679
70. Ng WL, Mohd MT, Shukla K. Functional Role of Circular RNAs in Cancer Development and Progression. RNA Biol (2018) 15(8):995–1005. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2018.1486659
71. Liang HF, Zhang XZ, Liu BG, Jia GT, Li WL. Circular RNA circ-ABCB10 Promotes Breast Cancer Proliferation and Progression Through Sponging miR-1271. Am J Cancer Res (2017) 7(7):1566–76.
72. Zeng K, He B, Yang BB, Xu T, Chen X, Xu M, et al. The Pro-Metastasis Effect of Circanks1b in Breast Cancer. Mol Cancer (2018) 17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0914-x
73. Du WW, Yang W, Li X, Awan FM, Yang Z, Fang L, et al. A Circular RNA circ-DNMT1 Enhances Breast Cancer Progression by Activating Autophagy. Oncogene (2018) 37(44):5829–42. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0369-y
74. Dittmer J. Breast Cancer Stem Cells: Features, Key Drivers and Treatment Options. Semin Cancer Biol (2018) 53:59–74. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.07.007
75. Das S, Mukherjee P, Chatterjee R, Jamal Z, Chatterji U. Enhancing Chemosensitivity of Breast Cancer Stem Cells by Downregulating SOX2 and ABCG2 Using Wedelolactone-Encapsulated Nanoparticles. Mol Cancer Ther (2019) 18(3):680–92. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0409
76. Yamada A, Nagahashi M, Aoyagi T, Huang WC, Lima S, Hait NC, et al. ABCC1-Exported Sphingosine-1-Phosphate, Produced by Sphingosine Kinase 1, Shortens Survival of Mice and Patients With Breast Cancer. Mol Cancer Res (2018) 16(6):1059–70. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0353
77. Su S, Chen J, Yao H, Liu J, Yu S, Lao L, et al. CD10(+)GPR77(+) Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Promote Cancer Formation and Chemoresistance by Sustaining Cancer Stemness. Cell (2018) 172(4):841–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.009
78. Li W, Ma H, Zhang J, Zhu L, Wang C, Yang Y. Unraveling the Roles of CD44/CD24 and ALDH1 as Cancer Stem Cell Markers in Tumorigenesis and Metastasis. Sci Rep (2017) 7(1):13856. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14364-2
79. Pérez-Herrero E, Fernández-Medarde A. Advanced Targeted Therapies in Cancer: Drug Nanocarriers, the Future of Chemotherapy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm (2015) 93:52–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.03.018
80. Zhang L, Yang X, Lv Y, Xin X, Qin C, Han X, et al. Cytosolic Co-Delivery of miRNA-34a and Docetaxel With Core-Shell Nanocarriers via Caveolae-Mediated Pathway for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer. Sci Rep (2017) 7:46186. doi: 10.1038/srep46186
81. Bose R, Uday KS, Zeng Y, Afjei R, Robinson E, Lau K, et al. Tumor Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicle-Coated Nanocarriers: An Efficient Theranostic Platform for the Cancer-Specific Delivery of Anti-miR-21 and Imaging Agents. ACS Nano (2018) 12(11):10817–32. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b02587
82. Gong C, Tian J, Wang Z, Gao Y, Wu X, Ding X, et al. Functional Exosome-Mediated Co-Delivery of Doxorubicin and Hydrophobically Modified microRNA 159 for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy. J Nanobiotechnol (2019) 17(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12951-019-0526-7
83. Haney MJ, Zhao Y, Jin YS, Li SM, Bago JR, Klyachko NL, et al. Macrophage-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Drug Delivery Systems for Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Therapy. J Neuroimmun Pharmacol (2020) 15(3):487–500. doi: 10.1007/s11481-019-09884-9
84. Tang Y, Soroush F, Tong Z, Kiani MF, Wang B. Targeted Multidrug Delivery System to Overcome Chemoresistance in Breast Cancer. Int J Nanomed (2017) 12:671–81. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S124770
85. Emens LA. Breast Cancer Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes. Clin Cancer Res (2018) 24(3):511–20. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3001
86. Jia H, Truica CI, Wang B, Wang Y, Ren X, Harvey HA, et al. Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Existing Challenges and Exciting Prospects. Drug Resist Update (2017) 32:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2017.07.002
87. Adams S, Loi S, Toppmeyer D, Cescon DW, De Laurentiis M, Nanda R, et al. Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Previously Untreated, PD-L1-Positive, Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Cohort B of the Phase II KEYNOTE-086 Study. Ann Oncol (2019) 30(3):405–11. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy518
88. Emens LA, Cruz C, Eder JP, Braiteh F, Chung C, Tolaney SM, et al. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Biomarker Analyses of Atezolizumab Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase 1 Study. JAMA Oncol (2019) 5(1):74–82. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4224
89. Rowshanravan B, Halliday N, Sansom DM. CTLA-4: A Moving Target in Immunotherapy. Blood (2018) 131(1):58–67. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-741033
90. Wang X, Qi Y, Kong X, Zhai J, Li Y, Song Y, et al. Immunological Therapy: A Novel Thriving Area for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment. Cancer Lett (2019) 442:409–28. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.10.042
91. Liu L, Wang Y, Miao L, Liu Q, Musetti S, Li J, et al. Combination Immunotherapy of MUC1 mRNA Nano-Vaccine and CTLA-4 Blockade Effectively Inhibits Growth of Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Mol Ther (2018) 26(1):45–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.10.020
92. Pai CS, Simons DM, Lu X, Evans M, Wei J, Wang YH, et al. Tumor-Conditional Anti-CTLA4 Uncouples Antitumor Efficacy From Immunotherapy-Related Toxicity. J Clin Invest (2019) 129(1):349–63. doi: 10.1172/JCI123391
93. Pernas S, Tolaney SM, Winer EP, Goel S. CDK4/6 Inhibition in Breast Cancer: Current Practice and Future Directions. Ther Adv Med Oncol (2018) 10:433565805. doi: 10.1177/1758835918786451
94. Dickler MN, Tolaney SM, Rugo HS, Cortés J, Diéras V, Patt D, et al. MONARCH 1, A Phase II Study of Abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 Inhibitor, as a Single Agent, in Patients With Refractory HR(+)/HER2(-) Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2017) 23(17):5218–24. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0754
95. Ma CX, Gao F, Luo J, Northfelt DW, Goetz M, Forero A, et al. NeoPalAna: Neoadjuvant Palbociclib, a Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor, and Anastrozole for Clinical Stage 2 or 3 Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2017) 23(15):4055–65. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3206
96. Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, Jones S, Im SA, Gelmon K, et al. Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med (2016) 375(20):1925–36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607303
97. Tolaney SM, Wardley AM, Zambelli S, Hilton JF, Troso-Sandoval TA, Ricci F, et al. Abemaciclib Plus Trastuzumab With or Without Fulvestrant Versus Trastuzumab Plus Standard-of-Care Chemotherapy in Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer (monarcHER): A Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial. Lancet Oncol (2020) 21(6):763–75. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30112-1
98. Teo ZL, Versaci S, Dushyanthen S, Caramia F, Savas P, Mintoff CP, et al. Combined CDK4/6 and PI3Kα Inhibition Is Synergistic and Immunogenic in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Res (2017) 77(22):6340–52. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2210
99. Clark AS, McAndrew NP, Troxel A, Feldman M, Lal P, Rosen M, et al. Combination Paclitaxel and Palbociclib: Results of a Phase I Trial in Advanced Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2019) 25(7):2072–9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0790
100. Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, Schneeweiss A, Barrios CH, Iwata H, et al. Atezolizumab and Nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med (2018) 379(22):2108–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809615
101. Murthy RK, Loi S, Okines A, Paplomata E, Hamilton E, Hurvitz SA, et al. Tucatinib, Trastuzumab, and Capecitabine for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med (2020) 382(7):597–609. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914609
102. Pérez-Hernández M, Arias A, Martínez-García D, Pérez-Tomás R, Quesada R, Soto-Cerrato V. Targeting Autophagy for Cancer Treatment and Tumor Chemosensitization. Cancers (Basel) (2019) 11(10):1599. doi: 10.3390/cancers11101599
103. Levy J, Towers CG, Thorburn A. Targeting Autophagy in Cancer. Nat Rev Cancer (2017) 17(9):528–42. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.53
104. Liao YX, Yu HY, Lv JY, Cai YR, Liu F, He ZM, et al. Targeting Autophagy is a Promising Therapeutic Strategy to Overcome Chemoresistance and Reduce Metastasis in Osteosarcoma. Int J Oncol (2019) 55(6):1213–22. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2019.4902
105. Cook KL, Wärri A, Soto-Pantoja DR, Clarke PA, Cruz MI, Zwart A, et al. Hydroxychloroquine Inhibits Autophagy to Potentiate Antiestrogen Responsiveness in ER+ Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2014) 20(12):3222–32. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3227
106. Cordani M, Somoza Á. Targeting Autophagy Using Metallic Nanoparticles: A Promising Strategy for Cancer Treatment. Cell Mol Life Sci (2019) 76(7):1215–42. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2973-y
107. Lehal R, Zaric J, Vigolo M, Urech C, Frismantas V, Zangger N, et al. Pharmacological Disruption of the Notch Transcription Factor Complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2020) 117(28):16292–301. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922606117
108. Wang K, Zhang Q, Li D, Ching K, Zhang C, Zheng X, et al. PEST Domain Mutations in Notch Receptors Comprise an Oncogenic Driver Segment in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Sensitive to a γ-Secretase Inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res (2015) 21(6):1487–96. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1348
Keywords: breast cancer, chemoresistance, metastasis, mechanism, novel strategy
Citation: Cao J, Zhang M, Wang B, Zhang L, Zhou F and Fang M (2021) Chemoresistance and Metastasis in Breast Cancer Molecular Mechanisms and Novel Clinical Strategies. Front. Oncol. 11:658552. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.658552
Received: 26 January 2021; Accepted: 23 April 2021;
Published: 01 July 2021.
Edited by:
Hirokazu Tanino, Kobe University, JapanReviewed by:
Jose J. G. Marin, University of Salamanca, SpainBruce Alan Bunnell, University of North Texas Health Science Center, United States
Copyright © 2021 Cao, Zhang, Wang, Zhang, Zhou and Fang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Meiyu Fang, ZmFuZ215QHpqY2Mub3JnLmNu; Long Zhang, TF9aaGFuZ0B6anUuZWR1LmNu; Fangfang Zhou, emhvdWZhbmdmYW5nQHN1ZGEuZWR1LmNu
†These authors have contributed equally to this work