AUTHOR=Zhou Jian-Guo , Liang Bo , Jin Su-Han , Liao Hui-Ling , Du Guo-Bo , Cheng Long , Ma Hu , Gaipl Udo S. 

TITLE=Development and Validation of an RNA-Seq-Based Prognostic Signature in Neuroblastoma

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oncology

VOLUME=9

YEAR=2019

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2019.01361

DOI=10.3389/fonc.2019.01361

ISSN=2234-943X

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Objective:</bold> The stratification of neuroblastoma (NBL) prognosis remains difficult. RNA-based signatures might be able to predict prognosis, but independent cross-platform validation is still rare.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> RNA-Seq-based profiles from NBL patients were acquired and then analyzed. The RNA-Seq prognostic index (RPI) and the clinically adjusted RPI (RCPI) were successively established in the training cohort (TARGET-NBL) and then verified in the validation cohort (GSE62564). Survival prediction was assessed using a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Functional enrichment analysis of the genes was conducted using bioinformatics methods.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> In the training cohort, 10 gene pairs were eventually integrated into the RPI. In both cohorts, the high-risk group had poor overall survival (OS) (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001 and <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001, respectively) and favorable event-free survival (EFS) (<italic>P</italic> = 0.00032 and <italic>P</italic> = 0.06, respectively). ROC curve analysis also showed that the RPI predicted OS (60 month AUC values of 0.718 and 0.593, respectively) and EFS (60 month AUC values of 0.627 and 0.852, respectively) well in both the training and validation cohorts. Clinicopathological indicators associated with prognosis in the univariate and multivariate regression analyses were identified and added to the RPI to form the RCPI. The RCPI was also used to divide populations into different risk groups, and the high-risk group had poor OS (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001 and <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001, respectively) and EFS (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05 and <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05, respectively). Finally, the RCPI had higher accuracy than the RPI for the prediction of OS (60 month AUC values of 0.730 and 0.852, respectively) and EFS (60 month AUC values of 0.663 and 0.763, respectively) in both the training and validation cohorts. Moreover, these differentially expressed genes may be involved in certain NBL-related events.</p><p><bold>Conclusions:</bold> The RCPI could reliably categorize NBL patients based on different risks of death.</p>