Acridine Orange: A Review of Novel Applications for Surgical Cancer Imaging and Therapy

Introduction: Acridine orange (AO) was first extracted from coal tar in the late nineteenth century and was used as a fluorescent dye. In this paper, we review emergent research about novel applications of AO for fluorescence surgery and cancer therapy.

Materials and methods: We performed a systematic search in the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus database using combinations of the term “acridine orange” with the following: “surgical oncology,” “neuropathology,” “microsurgery,” “intraoperative fluorescence,” “confocal microscopy,” “pathology,” “endomicroscopy,” “guidance,” “fluorescence guidance,” “oncology,” “surgery,” “neurooncology,” and “photodynamic therapy.” Peer-reviewed articles published in English were included in this review. We have also scanned references for relevant articles.

Results: We have reviewed studies on the various application of AO in microscopy, endomicroscopy, intraoperative fluorescence guidance, photodynamic therapy, sonodynamic therapy, radiodynamic therapy.

Conclusion: Although the number of studies on the clinical use of AO is limited, pilot studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of its application as an intraoperative fluorescent dye and as a novel photo- and radio-sensitizator. Further clinical studies are necessary to more definitively assess the clinical benefit AO-based fluorescence guidance, therapy for sarcomas, and to establish feasibility of this new approach for the treatment of other tumor types.

Introduction

Recent advancements in optical cancer imaging have facilitated the development of novel repurposing of known molecular probes for wide-field and microscopic fluorescence-based surgical guidance that have significant potential to positively impact patient care and to transform the field of surgical oncology. Acridine orange (AO) is a common fluorescent dye that has been well known for years. It has recently regained attention as a possible innovative drug for clinical applications in the field of oncology, particularly in cancer imaging and photodynamic therapy.

Acridine orange (AO) is a member of the xanthene class of molecules and shares a common aromatic structure with multiple acridine dyes (1, 2). Acridine dyes were first extracted from coal tar at the end of the nineteenth century. And was then used for a period of time as a dye in the fabric industry as well as for biological application. In 1912, Erlich and Beneda proposed to use acridines as antimalarials, with Browning suggesting use as an antimicrobial agent about a decade on in 1922 (3, 4). During World War I and II, the acridine dyes were widely used as antimicrobials prior to the widespread use of penicillin (4). The application of AO has been studied for bacteria detection in clinical specimens with prokaryotes fluorescing bright orange in low pH buffered media, while other cells produce green background fluorescence (5).

The novel research field of acridines is focused on their application in cancer theranostics due to its unique feature of preferential accumulation in the acidic environment of the tumor tissues and strong fluorescent properties (1, 6). AO has been recently explored in several preclinical (Figures 1A,B) and clinical studies for specific tumor cells targeting. As the novel diagnostic and therapeutic applications of AO broaden, we thought to review the existing body of knowledge regarding its potential use in various areas of medicine and outline its place and potential future impact on the rapidly growing area of image-guided cancer management. The goal of this paper is to review the current literature on the use of AO for fluorescence-guided surgery and cancer therapy. This review is focused on the clinical and translational studies that described the use of AO-based therapeutic and relevant diagnostic imaging methods.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. (A) Cytotoxic effect of acridine orange (AO)-charged exosomes derived from macrophages (Exo Mϕ-AO) compared to free AO against melanoma cell monolayer by cytofluorimetry assessment. Columns, mean percentages of cell death of two independent experiments run in triplicate; bars indicate standard deviation. p < 0.05. Figure adapted with permission from: Iessi et al. (43) (CC BY 4.0). (B) Fluorescence microscopy showing the formation of membrane “blebs” in melanoma cells treated with Exo Mϕ-AO (1 lg/ml) after 5 min of exposition to blue light. Figure adapted with permission from: Iessi et al. (43) (CC BY 4.0). (C) Upper image—Confocal laser endomicroscopy image of an animal glioblastoma stained with AO. Lower image—corresponding histology image. Image courtesy of Dr. Mark C. Preul. (D) Macroscopic fluorescence view of mouse osteosarcoma subcutaneously inoculated in the back of nude mouse after blue light excitation at 2 h after AO injection through the tail vein. Tumors emit green fluorescence (arrows). Injection site of the tail vein also emits green fluorescence Figure adapted with permission from: Kusuzaki et al. (6) (CC-BY 3.0).

Materials and Methods

Search Strategy

We performed a literature search in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases using the combinations of the term “Acridine” with the following: “surgical oncology,” “neuropathology,” “microsurgery,” “intraoperative fluorescence,” “confocal microscopy,” “pathology,” “endomicroscopy,” “guidance,” “fluorescence guidance,” “oncology,” “surgery,” “neurooncology,” and “photodynamic therapy.” Peer-reviewed articles published in English till September 2018 were included to compile this review. We have also scanned references for relevant articles. Search strategy is presented in Supplement 1.

Results and Discussion

Chemical Properties

AO (C17H19N3) is a low molecular weight (265.36 g/mol), weakly basic dye that easily penetrates cell membranes. AO has metachromatic properties and upon excitation with blue light, (~488 nm) emits green fluorescence when in monomer form and orange fluorescence when in dimer form. AO produces orange fluorescence when it binds to RNA and green fluorescence when it binds to DNA. However, this behavior differs significantly in live, apoptotic, and fixed permeabilized cells (6).

In live cells, AO diffuses through the cytoplasmic membrane and is retained in the cellular compartments with low pH, resulting in a bright orange fluorescence of lysosomes when excited with a blue light. AO also intercalates with the cytoplasmic and nuclear RNA molecules and results in a diffuse green fluorescence within all cells (7, 8). AO does not intercalate with DNA of intact living cells (9) and does not accumulate in other non-acidic organelles, such as the mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, or Golgi apparatus (7).

In both fixed permeabilized cells and cells undergoing apoptosis, pH compartmentalization is lost. Therefore, AO leaks from acidic lysosomes and diffusely binds to RNA and DNA molecules, resulting in yellow-orange fluorescence in the whole cell (6).

Based on the unique spectral distinctions and differential staining of RNA and DNA molecules, AO can be used to distinguish stages of apoptosis and necroptosis (10). During apoptosis, cells stained with AO demonstrate nuclear shrinkage, cellular fragmentation, and loss of nuclear demarcation, appearing therefore as red cells. Eventually the cellular RNA and red AO emission is lost while fragmented green nucleus remains. In contrast, during necrosis or necroptosis, the orange lysosomal signal is lost due to their disruption and to loss of cellular RNA, while the green signal from smooth and shrunken nuclei remains (11).

Most malignant tumors create an acidic environment due to increased anaerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect). Malignant cells also contain increased amounts of RNA and DNA compared to normal cells. Both factors result in increased accumulation and delayed elimination of AO in tumor cells (12).

Safety

Acridine dyes have a record of a mutagenic effect on certain types of bacteria, which raises a question about AO safety in humans (13). In 1969, Van Duuren showed that AO is neither an irritant nor a carcinogen to the skin of mice after repeated application. However, three out of twenty mice with skin application of AO developed liver tumors, suggesting systemic absorption of AO (14). In the same study, subcutaneous administration of AO lead to two of thirty mice and one of twenty rats developing tumors at the injection site. (14) In1978, the International Agency for Research on Cancer published the opinion that there was insufficient data or evaluation regarding the carcinogenicity of AO (15).

Systemic administration of AO has been investigated in several animal studies. The LD₅₀ for intravenous (IV) administration of AO in mice was determined to be 32 and 36 mg/kg for male and female mice, respectively (16). In determining the dose/toxicity relationship, Tatsuta et al. studied mice with gastric cancer and Tomson et al. studied subcutaneously implanted mammary carcinoma tumors treated with intraperitoneal AO application at a dose of 40 mg/kg and showed effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) without significant toxic effects (17, 18). Udovich et al. also demonstrated the absence of adverse effects of AO administered intraperitoneally to mice at dose of 0.33 and 3.3 mM for confocal endomicroscopy imaging (19).

In dogs, IV administration of AO at 0.1 mg/kg showed no clinical signs of toxicity and no abnormalities were seen in the blood within 30 days (20). Serum AO levels decreased rapidly within 30 min and were below the detection limit (5 ng/ml) 2 h after intravenous administration (20). In a case report of AO-based PDT in a cat with cutaneous malignant melanoma, no side effects were reported, where AO was administered locally to the surgical site at a dose of 1 μg/ml (21).

Several human studies have demonstrated the initial safety of AO. Kusuzaki et al. reported a pilot study of eight patients with various malignant neoplasms at the terminal stages (two sarcomas, two pancreatic carcinomas, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, lung, renal, and parotid carcinomas) treated with IV administration of AO at 0.5 or 1 mg/kg and low-dose (with 3 or 5 Gy) radiotherapy (RT) (13). This study did not confirm the assumptions about the toxic effects of the AO (13).

Several studies from Japan [n = 8 patients from Teneri, Japan (13) and n = 51 from Tsu City, Mie, Japan (22)] investigated the local application of AO solution to tumor cavities following tumor resection at the dosage of 1 μg/ml for 5 min. Subsequent analysis of AO-based photodiagnostics (PD), PDT and RT demonstrated no serious immediate or long-term complications (23–26).

In summary, there is still a lack of convincing data regarding the long-term safety and cancerogenic potential of AO. Future studies are needed to demonstrate if potential toxic effects of AO can be balanced by the benefits of AO-based cytoreduction therapies and diagnostics for various tissue organs, routs of administration, and doses.

Photodiagnostics

AO Use for Microscopy

AO has been extensively studied in pathology as a single dye and in combination with other dyes for specimen assessment using fluorescence microscopy. Differential staining of AO has been used to differentiate gliosis and glial neoplasms in human specimens with malignant glial cells demonstrating increased red fluorescence secondary to cytoplasmic RNA accumulation compared to reactive glial cells which remained green (27). AO has been used for mapping of GL261 mouse gliomas on 3-D reconstructed confocal imaging following tissue clearing (28). In this application, glioma regions exhibited increased intensity of fluorescence compared to the dimmer surrounding normal brain (28). Additionally, another study demonstrated the ability of AO to effectively differentiate brain tumor types using confocal microscopy of various brain tumor biopsies rapidly stained with AO (29).

Other applications of acridine orange include the simple and sensitive post-mortem detection of early myocardial infarction—normal myocardium fluoresces a golden brown color and myocardial anoxia/ischemia-damaged cells show a shift toward yellow or yellow-green (30). In the 1980's, Tejada et al. developed a specialized test with sperm AO fluorescence staining to determine male fertility (31). Krishnamurthy et al. showed that staining of breast, lung, kidney, and liver tissues with AO alone and subsequent imaging with confocal laser microscopy practically does not differ in efficiency from staining with H&E (32). Moreover, AO staining was much faster and easier than H&E (32). In yet another application, Wang et al. used AO for rapid non-destructive imaging of whole prostate biopsies using video-rate fluorescence structured illumination microscopy and demonstrated its feasibility as an alternative to destructive pathology (33).

In a study investigating surgical treatment of malignant tumors of the skin, AO was used as a nuclear dye in combination with eosin fluorescence (for labeling cytoplasm), and endogenous reflectance (for labeling collagen and keratin) for tri-modal confocal laser scanning microscopy of the skin samples (34). The authors reported that the novel staining method significantly reduced the time of surgical intervention while providing image quality similar to conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining (34). This finding corroborates with the conclusions drawn by Krishnamurthy regarding the non-inferiority of AO and CLE compared to conventional H&E. Another study reported an automatic pipeline that produces rapid, virtual H&E histology of tissue based on a fast, initial confocal staining of a tissue stained with a combination of AO and sulforhodamine 101, with the extrapolated conclusion that CLE with AO improves time to histological diagnosis over H&E (35). The intraoperative direct analysis that CLE can provide, particularly with AO as a contrast agent, has also been studied in the ophthalmological setting. The authors commented that this method provided a fast ex vivo preliminary diagnosis of conjunctival lesions, perhaps representing a novel tool for intraoperative as well as postsurgical management of conjunctival tumors (36).

AO is commonly used as a fluorescent dye to stain live tissues for intraoperative confocal endomicroscopy (Figure 1C), however, in vivo topical application of AO has not been investigated for all organs, and particularly in the brain up to this point due to safety concerns, with the less specific fluorescein sodium being used as a fluorescent contrast (37) In mouse brain glioma models and in fresh human biopsies ex vivo, AO staining and imaging with the confocal endomicroscope proved successful for differentiation of normal brain and glioma tissue (38, 39). Notably, in vivo AO staining was reported for confocal microlaparoscope imaging of ovarian cancer in 45 patients (40). In this study AO was used under FDA Investigational New Drug approval at a dose of ≤ 1 μL of 330 μM/L applied topically to the surface of the ovary just prior to imaging (40). This study concluded that trained surgeons were able to distinguish between normal and malignant ovarian surface epithelium in AO stained optical biopsies and that accuracy was similar during the ex vivo and in vivo imaging (40). There are two additional publications regarding AO application for the in vivo diagnosis of neoplasia in gynecology (41, 42), but currently, no in vivo investigation has been published for brain tissue.

AO Use in Wide-Field Fluorescence Guidance

After intravenous or topical application and soaking of the resection cavity in AO solution, researchers observed increased accumulation of AO in tumor tissue. This allowed accurate identification of the tumor regions as intense green fluorescence in wide field imaging (using specially designed fluorescence imaging operating microscope). AO fluorescence allowed for better tailoring of the resection area while maintaining the maximum amount of healthy tissue. This technology was used to remove breast tumors (35), soft tissue tumors and sarcomas (26, 44, 45), treatment of skin cancer (34, 46), conjunctival tumors (47), renal tumors, lungs, liver (32).

Considering the rapid development of intraoperative optical imaging tools and significant track of publications regarding AO-based microscopy, AO (similarly to fluorescein sodium and indocyanine green) is a promising topical contrast agent for in vivo pathology in humans. However, the long-term safety of topical AO should be established before such a method may be used in surgery. Alternatively, novel, dye-less in vivo microscopy methods like optical coherent tomography, RAMAN, and multiphoton reflectance microscopy may make any label-based methods obsolete in the future.

AO Use in PDT, SDT, and RDT

Mechanism of Action

The mechanism of AO-based PDT is based on the production of activated forms of oxygen upon AO fluorescence emission when exposed to blue light excitation (488 nm). As AO binds to the increased amount of RNA in tumor cells and also accumulates in lysosomes, released reactive oxygen species damage lipid membranes, leading to the leakage of lysosomal enzymes, and activation of apoptosis in the tumor cells (12). Myotoxicity was also suggested as another potential mechanism of AO (48).

AO can also increase the production of reactive radicals when exposed to low doses of X-ray radiation (26, 44, 49) or to the ultrasound energy (50). The principles of X-ray radiodynamic therapy (RDT) and sonodynamic therapy (SDT) have gained interest because unlike traditional light-based PDT, it has deeper tissue penetration depth. With RDT however, one energy source simultaneously activates both processes of radiotherapy and PDT, maximizing the synergetic treatment effect (49, 51). RDT with AO shows a similar effect on tumor cells when compared to PDT (52).

Preclinical Studies

One of the earliest studies of PDT with AO by Tomson et al. in the mouse model of undifferentiated carcinoma showed tumor resolution after PDT with AO in 90% of mice (18). Another early study by Ishikawa et al. which suggested the usefulness of PDT investigated photodynamic inactivation of argon laser with topical use of AO in the treatment of bladder cancer. Human bladder cancer cells (MGH-U1) were stained with AO and irradiated with argon laser with wave length of 496.5 nm and the intensity at the sample position about 4.0 mW/cm². The result shows that argon laser at the low intensity and with short irradiation time has a sufficient cytocidal effect (53). Satonaka et al. studied the AO-based PDT of pulmonary metastases of osteosarcomas in mice and demonstrated its feasibility (54) (Figure 1D). Interestingly, AO alone and AO-PDT inhibited invasion and metastases growth (54).

AO-based PDT and RDT has been advanced to clinical studies for the treatment of sarcomas (osteosarcomas and rhabdomyosarcomas) (1, 7, 12, 23, 25, 55), while its efficacy for brain tumors has been assessed only in preclinical studies. Osman et al. investigated the efficacy of AO-based PDT of glioma cells in vitro (56). Treatment of cultured glioblastoma cells with AO at a concentration of 0.001 mg/mL followed by 10 or 30 min incubation with white unfiltered light from light-emitting diode bulbs demonstrated dramatic cytostatic and cytocidal effects and almost complete eradication of glioblastoma cells in 72 h (56).

Local AO Administration

Matsubara et al. investigated the combined use of AO-based PD, followed by PDT and RDT for the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma (57). After subtotal resection of the tumor, the area of operation was filled with a solution of AO at a concentration of 1 μg/ml and after 5 min, the excess dye was washed off with saline. The first step included the use of wide-field fluorescence microscopy of the surgical area. Authors used a customized operating microscope (Carl Zeiss Co., Ltd, Oberkochen, Germany) with a xenon lamp equipped with an excitation filter (450–490 nm) resulting in a blue excitation light and a long-pass filter (>520 nm) for detection of the green fluorescence emitted by the tumor. After staining, a more thorough curettage of the area was performed until the green glow disappeared. The next step included AO-PDT, a 10 min exposure of the resection cavity to unfiltered light from a xenon lamp with a brightness of 100,000 lx mounted on an operating microscope. After that, a layer of sutures was applied to the wound without rinsing the AO solution. The patient was then transferred to the radiotherapy room where an X-ray exposure was performed (5 Gy) (57).

Matsubara et al. reported long-term results of AO-based PD followed by PDT and RDT in 18 patients from 1996 to 2008, showing that the method allows preservation of more healthy tissue during resection (26, 44). This advantage helped to preserve functionality of the limbs due to more tailored resection compared to the standard wide margin resection method without significant differences in the recurrence rate.

Systemic AO Administration

There was only one study found on the AO-based RDT with systemic administration of AO which included treatment of 8 patients with end-stage cancers. In this study, two patients had sarcomas, two had pancreatic cancer, and one patient each had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, renal, lung, and parotid cancer. (13). Two hours after 1 mg/kg AO was administered IV, the patients received 3–5 Gy X-ray irradiation 3 times within a 3 week period. In 3 out of 5 patients who completed the full course of the proposed therapy, tumors reduced in size and symptoms improved. Notably, this study demonstrated the absence of a toxic effect on the body with the introduction of therapeutic doses of the drug (13).

While some patients benefited in these small pilot studies, further clinical investigation is necessary to assess if the observed cytocidal effect could be achieved in other types of cancer. However, the absence of serious side effects of AO, coupled with the likely cytolytic effect of RDT, together with the radiation, opens up new horizons for exploring its potential in other cancers.

Conclusions and Future Directions

The use of AO in oncology represents a novel approach but the number of studies is currently limited, likely due to the historical concerns about AO safety. More studies are necessary to identify tumor types and stages where application of AO can be useful to assess its clinical value and identify potential side effects.

There are several promising areas where AO may be beneficial. First, it is worth noting the possibility of macro and confocal fluorescence microscopy for in vivo fluorescence guidance during surgical resection. The effect of AO fluorescence guidance has not yet been studied in brain tumors and should be tested in comparison with other fluorescence guidance techniques such as 5-aminolevulinic acid, fluorescein sodium, and indocyanine green, which are already available and have a safety record and established efficacy.

Of particular interest is the effect of intravenously administered AO on tumor cells when exposed to small doses of radiation. If successful, this could dramatically change the approach for cancer treatment. AO-based RDT treatment of distant metastasis is another promising area of application (54). AO fluorescence guidance combined with PDT, SDT, or RDT can be potentially applied to all organs for the surgical treatment of tumor lesions, including brain tumor surgery. Brain gliomas are notorious for their infiltrative growth and thus the possibility of selective killing of any residual tumor cells after surgical resection is encouraging and compelling. However, there are also considerable limitations in that the blood-tumor-brain-barrier at the periphery of the gliomas might decrease efficacy of AO delivery, decreasing its photosensitizing effect (58). It should also be noted that AO is one among many drugs (including 5-ALA) that are in development for PDT, SDA, or RDT for the treatment of various cancers and their comparative efficacy for various cancers is yet to be established (59–63). Future drug developments include nanoparticles and targeted multipurpose theranostic drugs which can be used for intraoperative guidance and subsequent precision treatment of any microscopic residual tumor (36).

AO has demonstrated utility in multiple settings up to this point in time with the majority of applications being ex vivo. Although use of AO is not new with practical applications from urology, gynecology, to ophthalmology detailed, repurposing AO for possible specific tumor labeling in the field of neurosurgery has been minimally explored. While there is historical evidence of potentially detrimental health effects of AO dating back to the late 1960s, there is a small body of growing literature in the time since that points to its potential uses in vivo without toxic systemic effects. With the evidence presented in this review regarding the role of AO in tumor identification, we are especially interested with respect to brain lesions what AO can possibly provide in terms of specific fluorescent tumor labeling. More data is needed to determine the safety of AO in vivo and its future applications, particularly in neurosurgery.

Author Contributions

VB, LB, NO, RP, SO, VS, MA, and AP researched the data, wrote the manuscript, generated the figures, provided participation in the discussion of the content, and revised the review.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

LB acknowledges scholarship support #SP-2545.2018.4.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2019.00925/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Kusuzaki K, Murata H, Matsubara T, Satonaka H, Wakabayashi T, Matsumine A, et al. Review. Acridine orange could be an innovative anticancer agent under photon energy. In Vivo. (2007) 21:205–14.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

2. Sharma VK, Sahare PD, Rastogi RC, Ghoshal SK, Mohan D. Excited state characteristics of acridine dyes: acriflavine and acridine orange. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. (2003) 59:1799–804. doi: 10.1016/S1386-1425(02)00440-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Browning CH, Cohen JB, Gaunt R, Gulbransen R. Relationships between antiseptic action and chemical constitution with special reference to compounds of the pyridine, quinoline, acridine and phenazine series. Proc R Soc B. (1922) 93:329–66. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1922.0025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Wainwright M. Acridine–a neglected antibacterial chromophore. J Antimicrob Chemother. (2001) 47:1–13. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.1.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kronvall G, Myhre E. Differential staining of bacteria in clinical specimens using acridine orange buffered at low pH. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. (1977) 85:249–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1977.tb01970.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kusuzaki K, Matsubara T, Satonaka H, Matsumine A, Nakamura T, Sudo A, et al. Intraoperative Photodynamic Surgery (iPDS) with acridine orange for musculoskeletal sarcomas. Cureus. (2014) 6:e204. doi: 10.7759/cureus.204

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kusuzaki K, Murata H, Takeshita H, Hashiguchi S, Nozaki T, Emoto K, et al. Intracellular binding sites of acridine orange in living osteosarcoma cells. Anticancer Res. (2000) 20:971–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

8. Amagasa J. Mechanisms of photodynamic inactivation of acridine orange-sensitized transfer RNA: participation of singlet oxygen and base damage leading to inactivation. J Radiat Res. (1986) 27:339–51. doi: 10.1269/jrr.27.339

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Delic J, Coppey J, Magdelenat H, Coppey-Moisan M. Impossibility of acridine orange intercalation in nuclear DNA of the living cell. Exp Cell Res. (1991) 194:147–53. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(91)90144-J

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Plemel JR, Caprariello AV, Keough MB, Henry TJ, Tsutsui S, Chu TH, et al. Unique spectral signatures of the nucleic acid dye acridine orange can distinguish cell death by apoptosis and necroptosis. J Cell Biol. (2017) 216:1163–81. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201602028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Mares I, Drevo M, Adam E, Kubatova M, Casny J. Live measles vaccine from a further attenuated strain SEVAC. Prog Immunobiol Stand. (1967) 3:188–91.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

12. Kusuzaki K, Hosogi S, Ashihara E, Matsubara T, Satonaka H, Nakamura T, et al. Translational research of photodynamic therapy with acridine orange which targets cancer acidity. Curr Pharm Des. (2012) 18:1414–20. doi: 10.2174/138161212799504812

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Kusuzaki K, Takai T, Yoshimura H, Inoue K, Takai S, Baldini N. Clinical trial of radiotherapy after intravenous injection of acridine orange for patients with cancer. Anticancer Res. (2018) 38:481–9. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12248

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Van Duuren BL, Sivak A, Katz C, Melchionne S. Tumorigenicity of acridine orange. Br J Cancer. (1969) 23:587–90. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1969.72

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Acridine orange. In: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Vol. 16. Lyon: IARC Press (1978), 145–52.

16. Nakamura T, Kusuzaki K, Matsubara T, Matsumine A, Asanuma K, Satonaka H, et al. Determination of the LD50 of acridine orange via intravenous administration in mice in preparation for clinical application to cancer therapy. In Vivo. (2014) 28:523–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

17. Tatsuta M, Iishi H, Yamamura H, Yamamoto R, Okuda S. Comparison of photodynamic inactivation of experimental stomach tumors sensitized by acridine orange or hematoporphyrin derivatives. Oncology. (1988) 45:35–40. doi: 10.1159/000226527

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Tomsom SH. Tumor destruction due to acridine orange photoactivation by argon laser. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (1976) 267:191–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb41608.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Udovich JA, Besselsen DG, Gmitro AF. Assessment of acridine orange and SYTO 16 for in vivo imaging of the peritoneal tissues in mice. J Microsc. (2009) 234:124–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03153.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Maruo T, Shibuya K, Takahashi M, Nakayama T, Fukunaga K, Orito K. Safety of acridine orange intravenous administration in dogs. Int J Appl Res Vet Med. (2012) 10:164–8.

21. Hori H, Teramoto Y, Fukuyama Y, Maruo T., Marginal resection and acridine orange photodynamic therapy in a cat with recurrent cutaneous malignant melanoma. Int J Appl Res Vet Med. (2014) 12:181–5.

Google Scholar

22. Matsubara T, Kusuzaki K, Matsumine A, Nakamura T, Sudo A. Can a less radical surgery using photodynamic therapy with acridine orange be equal to a wide-margin resection? Clin Orthop Relat Res. (2013) 471:792–802. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2616-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Nakamura T, Kusuzaki K, Matsubara T, Matsumine A, Murata H, Uchida A. A new limb salvage surgery in cases of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma using photodynamic surgery, followed by photo- and radiodynamic therapy with acridine orange. J Surg Oncol. (2008) 97:523–8. doi: 10.1002/jso.21025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kusuzaki K, Murata H, Matsubara T, Miyazaki S, Shintani K, Seto M, et al. Clinical outcome of a novel photodynamic therapy technique using acridine orange for synovial sarcomas. Photochem Photobiol. (2005) 81:705–9. doi: 10.1562/2004-06-27-RA-218.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Kusuzaki K, Murata H, Matsubara T, Miyazaki S, Okamura A, Seto M, et al. Clinical trial of photodynamic therapy using acridine orange with/without low dose radiation as new limb salvage modality in musculoskeletal sarcomas. Anticancer Res. (2005) 25:1225–35.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

26. Matsubara T, Kusuzaki K, Matsumine A, Murata H, Nakamura T, Uchida A, et al. Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive surgery using acridine orange for musculoskeletal sarcomas around the forearm, compared with conventional limb salvage surgery after wide resection. J Surg Oncol. (2010) 102:271–5. doi: 10.1002/jso.21602

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Sarnat HB, Curry B, Rewcastle NB, Trevenen CL. Gliosis and glioma distinguished by acridine orange. Can J Neurol Sci. (1987) 14:31–5. doi: 10.1017/S0317167100026135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Belykh E, Miller EJ, Hu D, Martirosyan NL, Woolf EC, Scheck AC, et al. Scanning fiber endoscope improves detection of 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX fluorescence at the boundary of infiltrative glioma. World Neurosurg. (2018) 113:e51–69. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Martirosyan NL, Georges J, Eschbacher JM, Belykh E, Carotenuto A, Spetzler RF, et al. Confocal scanning microscopy provides rapid, detailed intraoperative histological assessment of brain neoplasms: experience with 106 cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2018) 169:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.03.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Badir B, Knight B. Fluorescence microscopy in the detection of early myocardial infarction. Forensic Sci Int. (1987) 34:99–102. doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(87)90088-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Tejada RI, Mitchell JC, Norman A, Marik JJ, Friedman S. A test for the practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. Fertil Steril. (1984) 42:87–91. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47963-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Krishnamurthy S, Cortes A, Lopez M, Wallace M, Sabir S, Shaw K, et al. Ex vivo confocal fluorescence microscopy for rapid evaluation of tissues in surgical pathology practice. Arch Pathol Lab Med. (2018) 142:396–401. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0164-OA

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Wang M, Kimbrell HZ, Sholl AB, Tulman DB, Elfer KN, Schlichenmeyer TC, et al. High-resolution rapid diagnostic imaging of whole prostate biopsies using video-rate fluorescence structured illumination microscopy. Cancer Res. (2015) 75:4032–41. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3806

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Gareau D, Bar A, Snaveley N, Lee K, Chen N, Swanson N, et al. Tri-modal confocal mosaics detect residual invasive squamous cell carcinoma in Mohs surgical excisions. J Biomed Opt. (2012) 17:066018. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.6.066018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Cahill LC, Giacomelli MG, Yoshitake T, Vardeh H, Faulkner-Jones BE, Connolly JL, et al. Rapid virtual hematoxylin and eosin histology of breast tissue specimens using a compact fluorescence nonlinear microscope. Lab Invest. (2018) 98:150–60. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2017.116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Ni K, Lan G, Veroneau SS, Duan X, Song Y, Lin W. Nanoscale metal-organic frameworks for mitochondria-targeted radiotherapy-radiodynamic therapy. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:4321. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06655-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Belykh E, Martirosyan NL, Yagmurlu K, Miller EJ, Eschbacher JM, Izadyyazdanabadi M, et al. Intraoperative fluorescence imaging for personalized brain tumor resection: current state and future directions. Front Surg. (2016) 3:55. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Martirosyan NL, Georges J, Eschbacher JM, Cavalcanti DD, Elhadi AM, Abdelwahab MG, et al. Potential application of a handheld confocal endomicroscope imaging system using a variety of fluorophores in experimental gliomas and normal brain. Neurosurg Focus. (2014) 36:E16. doi: 10.3171/2013.11.FOCUS13486

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Foersch S, Heimann A, Ayyad A, Spoden GA, Florin L, Mpoukouvalas K, et al. Confocal laser endomicroscopy for diagnosis and histomorphologic imaging of brain tumors in vivo. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e41760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041760

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Risi MD, Rouse AR, Chambers SK, Hatch KD, Zheng W, Gmitro AF. Pilot clinical evaluation of a confocal microlaparoscope for ovarian cancer detection. Int J Gynecol Cancer. (2016) 26:248–54. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000595

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Hammond DO. Fluorescence and acridine orange in the diagnosis of gynecologic neoplasia in vivo. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (1973) 115:272–3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(73)90299-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Hoglund A, Joelsson I, Ingelman-Sundberg A, Odeblad E. Acridine orange in gynecologic cancer. I. The proton magnetic resonance spectrum of acridine orange zinc chloride. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. (1972) 51:309–13. doi: 10.3109/00016347209156864

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Iessi E, Logozzi M, Lugini L, Azzarito T, Federici C, Spugnini EP, et al. Acridine orange/exosomes increase the delivery and the effectiveness of acridine orange in human melanoma cells: a new prototype for theranostics of tumors. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. (2017) 32:648–57. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2017.1292263

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Matsubara T, Kusuzaki K, Matsumine A, Murata H, Marunaka Y, Hosogi S, et al. Photodynamic therapy with acridine orange in musculoskeletal sarcomas. J Bone Joint Surg. (2010) 92-B:760–2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B6.23788

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Kusuzaki K, Aomori K, Suginoshita T, Minami G, Takeshita H, Murata H, et al. Total tumor cell elimination with minimum damage to normal tissues in musculoskeletal sarcomas following photodynamic therapy with acridine orange. Oncology. (2000) 59:174–80. doi: 10.1159/000012156

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Jain M, Rajadhyaksha M, Nehal K. Implementation of fluorescence confocal mosaicking microscopy by “early adopter” Mohs surgeons and dermatologists: recent progress. J Biomed Opt. (2017) 22:24002. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.2.024002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Iovieno A, Longo C, De Luca M, Piana S, Fontana L, Ragazzi M. Fluorescence confocal microscopy for ex vivo diagnosis of conjunctival tumors: a pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol. (2016) 168:207–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Fotia C, Avnet S, Kusuzaki K, Roncuzzi L, Baldini N. Acridine orange is an effective anti-cancer drug that affects mitochondrial function in osteosarcoma cells. Curr Pharm Des. (2015) 21:4088–94. doi: 10.2174/1381612821666150918144953

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Cline B, Delahunty I, Xie J. Nanoparticles to mediate X-ray-induced photodynamic therapy and Cherenkov radiation photodynamic therapy. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. (2018) 11:e1541. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1541

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Suzuki N, Okada K, Chida S, Komori C, Shimada Y, Suzuki T. Antitumor effect of acridine orange under ultrasonic irradiation in vitro. Anticancer Res. (2007) 27:4179–84.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

51. Wilson BC, Pogue BW. Optical and x-ray technology synergies enabling diagnostic and therapeutic applications in medicine. J Biomed Optics. (2018) 23:1. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.12.121610

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Hashiguchi S, Kusuzaki K, Murata H, Takeshita H, Hashiba M, Nishimura T, et al. Acridine orange excited by low-dose radiation has a strong cytocidal effect on mouse osteosarcoma. Oncology. (2002) 62:85–93. doi: 10.1159/000048251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Ishikawa S, Nemoto R, Kanoh S, Kobayashi K, Ishizaka S. Photodynamic inactivation of bladder cancer cells (MGH-U1) sensitized with acridine orange and irradiated by argon laser. Tohoku J Exp Med. (1984) 144:265–71. doi: 10.1620/tjem.144.265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Satonaka H, Kusuzaki K, Akeda K, Tsujii M, Iino T, Uemura T, et al. Acridine orange inhibits pulmonary metastasis of mouse osteosarcoma. Anticancer Res. (2011) 31:4163–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

55. Matsubara T, Kusuzaki K, Matsumine A, Shintani K, Satonaka H, Uchida A. Acridine orange used for photodynamic therapy accumulates in malignant musculoskeletal tumors depending on pH gradient. Anticancer Res. (2006) 26:187–93.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

56. Osman H, Elsahy D, Saadatzadeh MR, Pollok KE, Yocom S, Hattab EM, et al. Acridine orange as a novel photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy in glioblastoma. World Neurosurg. (2018) 114:e1310–5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Matsubara T, Kusuzaki K, Matsumine A, Murata H, Satonaka H, Shintani K, et al. A new therapeutic modality involving acridine orange excitation by photon energy used during reduction surgery for rhabdomyosarcomas. Oncol Rep. (2009) 21:89–94. doi: 10.3892/or_00000193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Randall EC, Emdal KB, Laramy JK, Kim M, Roos A, Calligaris D, et al. Integrated mapping of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in a patient-derived xenograft model of glioblastoma. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:4904. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07334-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Costley D, Mc Ewan C, Fowley C, McHale AP, Atchison J, Nomikou N, et al. Treating cancer with sonodynamic therapy: a review. Int J Hyperthermia. (2015) 31:107–17. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2014.992484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Yoshida M, Kobayashi H, Terasaka S, Endo S, Yamaguchi S, Motegi H, et al. Sonodynamic therapy for malignant glioma using 220-kHz transcranial magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound and 5-aminolevulinic acid. Ultrasound Med Biol. (2019) 45:526–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.10.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Suehiro S, Ohnishi T, Yamashita D, Kohno S, Inoue A, Nishikawa M, et al. Enhancement of antitumor activity by using 5-ALA-mediated sonodynamic therapy to induce apoptosis in malignant gliomas: significance of high-intensity focused ultrasound on 5-ALA-SDT in a mouse glioma model. J Neurosurg. (2018) 129:1416–28. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.JNS162398

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Mahmoudi K, Garvey KL, Bouras A, Cramer G, Stepp H, Jesu Raj JG, et al. 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of high-grade gliomas. J Neurooncol. (2019) 141:595–607. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03103-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Takahashi J, Murakami M, Mori T, Iwahashi H. Verification of radiodynamic therapy by medical linear accelerator using a mouse melanoma tumor model. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:2728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21152-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar