AUTHOR=Sharma Uma , Agarwal Khushbu , Sah Rani G. , Parshad Rajinder , Seenu Vurthaluru , Mathur Sandeep , Gupta Siddhartha D. , Jagannathan Naranamangalam R. 

TITLE=Can Multi-Parametric MR Based Approach Improve the Predictive Value of Pathological and Clinical Therapeutic Response in Breast Cancer Patients?

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oncology

VOLUME=8

YEAR=2018

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2018.00319

DOI=10.3389/fonc.2018.00319

ISSN=2234-943X

ABSTRACT=<p>The potential of total choline (tCho), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and tumor volume, both individually and in combination of all these three parameters (multi-parametric approach), was evaluated in predicting both pathological and clinical responses in 42 patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) enrolled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Patients were sequentially examined by conventional MRI; diffusion weighted imaging and <italic>in vivo</italic> proton MR spectroscopy at 4 time points (pre-therapy, after I, II, and III NACT) at 1.5 T. Miller Payne grading system was used for pathological assessment of response. Of the 42 patients, 24 were pathological responders (pR) while 18 were pathological non-responders (pNR). Clinical response determination classified 26 patients as responders (cR) while 16 as non-responders (cNR). tCho and ADC showed significant changes after I NACT, however, MR measured tumor volume showed reduction only after II NACT both in pR and cR. After III NACT, the sensitivity to detect responders was highest for MR volume (83.3% for pR and 96.2% for cR) while the specificity was highest for ADC (76.5% for pR and 100% for cR). Combination of all three parameters exhibited lower sensitivity (66.7%) than MR volume for pR prediction, however, a moderate improvement was seen in specificity (58.8%). For the prediction of clinical response, multi-parametric approach showed 84.6% sensitivity with 100% specificity compared to MR volume (sensitivity 96.2%; specificity 80%). Kappa statistics demonstrated substantial agreement of clinical response with MR volume (<italic>k</italic> = 0.78) and with multi-parametric approach (<italic>k</italic> = 0.80) while moderate agreement was seen for tCho (<italic>k</italic> = 0.48) and ADC (<italic>k</italic> = 0.46). The values of k for tCho, MR volume and ADC were 0.31, 0.38, and 0.18 indicating fair, moderate, and slight agreement, respectively with pathological response. Moderate agreement (<italic>k</italic> = 0.44) was observed between clinical and pathological responses. Our study demonstrated that both tCho and ADC are strong predictors of assessment of early pathological and clinical responses. Multi-parametric approach yielded 100% specificity in predicting clinical response. Following III NACT, MR volume emerged as highly suitable predictor for both clinical and pathological assessments. PCA demonstrated separate clusters of pR vs. pNR and cR vs. cNR at post-therapy while with some overlap at pre-therapy.</p>